SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protesters take part in the 'Tax March' calling on President Donald Trump to release his tax records in 2017 in New York. (Photo: Kena Betancur/AFP/Getty Images)
Trump's Fight to Keep His Tax Returns Secret Has Nowhere Left to Go But the US Supreme Court
"We are so close," said Trump critics after an appeals court decision.
Nov 13, 2019
Critics of President Donald Trump welcomed a federal appeals court's decision Wednesday to let stand an earlier ruling affirming the authority of Congress to seek Trump's tax records, which sets up a potential review of the case by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In an 8-3 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to review an October ruling by a three-judge appeals court panel that rejected Trump's effort to block a subpoena that the Democrat-controlled U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee sent to his accounting firm, Mazars USA, earlier this year.
Judge David Tatel, joined by Judge Patricia Millett, wrote in October that "contrary to the president's arguments, the committee possesses authority under both the House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply." Tatel and Millett were appointed by Democratic presidents; dissenting Judge Neomi Rao was appointed by Trump.
Judges Rao, Gregory Katsas, and Karen LeCraft Henderson all published dissenting statements for Wednesday's ruling. Katsas was also nominated by Trump and LeCraft Henderson was appointed by George H.W. Bush.
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Trump attorney Jay Sekulow confirmed the president's legal team "will be seeking review at the Supreme Court," to which Trump has appointed two right-wing justices--Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh--during his first term.
The national movement Tax March declared in response to the appeals court decision, "we are so close!"
Tax March executive director Maura Quint said in a statement Thursday that "we are heartened to see the decision" from the appeals court.
"Congress has the constitutionally designated role of presidential oversight, and this president most certainly needs it," Quint added. "It is vital for the preservation of our democracy that no president be allowed to consider themselves above the law. Without reviewing his tax returns, we continue to be uncertain in whose interests President Trump is working."
Tax March was founded in 2017 as a grassroots nonpartisan effort to pressure Trump to release his tax returns. So far, the president has resisted that pressure.
"His intense efforts to hide these returns from Congress and from the public give us tremendous pause and reason to believe that the president may not be working in the interests of Americans," said Quint. "Instead, his continued efforts to avoid transparency and obscure his motivations and influences compel us to wonder who is benefiting from his leadership? At this juncture, we have no reason to believe it is the American public."
Wednesday's decision came as the House Democrats held the first public hearing for the impeachment inquiry into the president. Progressive advocacy group Stand Up America tweeted after the appeals court decision, "Safe to say that today was a bad day for Donald Trump."
"Trump was the first major party presidential nominee not to release any tax returns, dating back to 1976, when President Gerald Ford released a summary of his tax returns, rather than the complete returns," according to FactCheck.org.
The fight over the House committee's subpoena is not the only ongoing legal battle involving Trump's tax returns. Earlier this month, a three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a district judge's ruling that the president's accounting firm must turn over eight years of personal and corporate tax returns to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.
Just days before that appeal panel ruling, Trump announced he was changing his permanent residence to Palm Beach, Florida because "I cherish New York, and the people of New York, and always will, but unfortunately, despite the fact that I pay millions of dollars in city, state, and local taxes each year, I have been treated very badly by the political leaders of both the city and state."
This post has been updated with additional comment from Tax March.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Critics of President Donald Trump welcomed a federal appeals court's decision Wednesday to let stand an earlier ruling affirming the authority of Congress to seek Trump's tax records, which sets up a potential review of the case by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In an 8-3 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to review an October ruling by a three-judge appeals court panel that rejected Trump's effort to block a subpoena that the Democrat-controlled U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee sent to his accounting firm, Mazars USA, earlier this year.
Judge David Tatel, joined by Judge Patricia Millett, wrote in October that "contrary to the president's arguments, the committee possesses authority under both the House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply." Tatel and Millett were appointed by Democratic presidents; dissenting Judge Neomi Rao was appointed by Trump.
Judges Rao, Gregory Katsas, and Karen LeCraft Henderson all published dissenting statements for Wednesday's ruling. Katsas was also nominated by Trump and LeCraft Henderson was appointed by George H.W. Bush.
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Trump attorney Jay Sekulow confirmed the president's legal team "will be seeking review at the Supreme Court," to which Trump has appointed two right-wing justices--Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh--during his first term.
The national movement Tax March declared in response to the appeals court decision, "we are so close!"
Tax March executive director Maura Quint said in a statement Thursday that "we are heartened to see the decision" from the appeals court.
"Congress has the constitutionally designated role of presidential oversight, and this president most certainly needs it," Quint added. "It is vital for the preservation of our democracy that no president be allowed to consider themselves above the law. Without reviewing his tax returns, we continue to be uncertain in whose interests President Trump is working."
Tax March was founded in 2017 as a grassroots nonpartisan effort to pressure Trump to release his tax returns. So far, the president has resisted that pressure.
"His intense efforts to hide these returns from Congress and from the public give us tremendous pause and reason to believe that the president may not be working in the interests of Americans," said Quint. "Instead, his continued efforts to avoid transparency and obscure his motivations and influences compel us to wonder who is benefiting from his leadership? At this juncture, we have no reason to believe it is the American public."
Wednesday's decision came as the House Democrats held the first public hearing for the impeachment inquiry into the president. Progressive advocacy group Stand Up America tweeted after the appeals court decision, "Safe to say that today was a bad day for Donald Trump."
"Trump was the first major party presidential nominee not to release any tax returns, dating back to 1976, when President Gerald Ford released a summary of his tax returns, rather than the complete returns," according to FactCheck.org.
The fight over the House committee's subpoena is not the only ongoing legal battle involving Trump's tax returns. Earlier this month, a three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a district judge's ruling that the president's accounting firm must turn over eight years of personal and corporate tax returns to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.
Just days before that appeal panel ruling, Trump announced he was changing his permanent residence to Palm Beach, Florida because "I cherish New York, and the people of New York, and always will, but unfortunately, despite the fact that I pay millions of dollars in city, state, and local taxes each year, I have been treated very badly by the political leaders of both the city and state."
This post has been updated with additional comment from Tax March.
Critics of President Donald Trump welcomed a federal appeals court's decision Wednesday to let stand an earlier ruling affirming the authority of Congress to seek Trump's tax records, which sets up a potential review of the case by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In an 8-3 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to review an October ruling by a three-judge appeals court panel that rejected Trump's effort to block a subpoena that the Democrat-controlled U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee sent to his accounting firm, Mazars USA, earlier this year.
Judge David Tatel, joined by Judge Patricia Millett, wrote in October that "contrary to the president's arguments, the committee possesses authority under both the House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply." Tatel and Millett were appointed by Democratic presidents; dissenting Judge Neomi Rao was appointed by Trump.
Judges Rao, Gregory Katsas, and Karen LeCraft Henderson all published dissenting statements for Wednesday's ruling. Katsas was also nominated by Trump and LeCraft Henderson was appointed by George H.W. Bush.
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Trump attorney Jay Sekulow confirmed the president's legal team "will be seeking review at the Supreme Court," to which Trump has appointed two right-wing justices--Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh--during his first term.
The national movement Tax March declared in response to the appeals court decision, "we are so close!"
Tax March executive director Maura Quint said in a statement Thursday that "we are heartened to see the decision" from the appeals court.
"Congress has the constitutionally designated role of presidential oversight, and this president most certainly needs it," Quint added. "It is vital for the preservation of our democracy that no president be allowed to consider themselves above the law. Without reviewing his tax returns, we continue to be uncertain in whose interests President Trump is working."
Tax March was founded in 2017 as a grassroots nonpartisan effort to pressure Trump to release his tax returns. So far, the president has resisted that pressure.
"His intense efforts to hide these returns from Congress and from the public give us tremendous pause and reason to believe that the president may not be working in the interests of Americans," said Quint. "Instead, his continued efforts to avoid transparency and obscure his motivations and influences compel us to wonder who is benefiting from his leadership? At this juncture, we have no reason to believe it is the American public."
Wednesday's decision came as the House Democrats held the first public hearing for the impeachment inquiry into the president. Progressive advocacy group Stand Up America tweeted after the appeals court decision, "Safe to say that today was a bad day for Donald Trump."
"Trump was the first major party presidential nominee not to release any tax returns, dating back to 1976, when President Gerald Ford released a summary of his tax returns, rather than the complete returns," according to FactCheck.org.
The fight over the House committee's subpoena is not the only ongoing legal battle involving Trump's tax returns. Earlier this month, a three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a district judge's ruling that the president's accounting firm must turn over eight years of personal and corporate tax returns to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.
Just days before that appeal panel ruling, Trump announced he was changing his permanent residence to Palm Beach, Florida because "I cherish New York, and the people of New York, and always will, but unfortunately, despite the fact that I pay millions of dollars in city, state, and local taxes each year, I have been treated very badly by the political leaders of both the city and state."
This post has been updated with additional comment from Tax March.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.