People on low-incomes and retirees choose food at the World Harvest Food Bank in Los Angeles, California on July 24, 2019. (Photo: Mark Ralston/AFP via Getty Images)
New Study Shows Why Trump Plan to Gut Food Stamps 'Will Literally Result in More People Dying'
"At a time when we're thinking about restricting access to SNAP and its generosity, our [study] speaks to the importance of SNAP to such basic outcomes as mortality," said study co-author Colleen Heflin.
A new study published Monday in the journal Health Affairs found that people are less likely to die prematurely if they receive federal nutrition assistance, shedding light on the potentially deadly consequences of President Donald Trump's proposal to strip food stamps from millions of low-income Americans.
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the research found, "led to a population-wide reduction of 1-2 percentage points in mortality from all causes and a reduction in specific causes of death among people ages 40-64."
As HuffPost reported, when "looking specifically at deaths of despair--from drug overdoses, alcohol poisoning and suicide--the researchers found that SNAP benefits cut the mortality rate in half, from 1.64% to 0.81%, for people ages 40 to 64."
Rachel West, an economic policy adviser to the House Committee on Education and Labor, said the study confirms the effectiveness of federal food assistance and demonstrates that "cutting SNAP, like Trump is trying to do, will literally result in more people dying before age 65."
"SNAP saves lives," West tweeted.
The study came just days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's proposal to end automatic food stamp eligibility for those receiving other forms of federal and state assistance. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said in July the move would eliminate food stamps benefits for more than three million people.
The proposed rule change could also cause 500,000 children to lose free school meals, the Washington Post reported in September.
"At a time when we're thinking about restricting access to SNAP and its generosity, our [study] speaks to the importance of SNAP to such basic outcomes as mortality," Colleen Heflin, a professor at Syracuse University and co-author of the new study, told HuffPost.
NPR reported last week that most of the 170,000 public comments on the Trump administration's food stamps proposal were negative.
"There is no excuse that in our first world country we have children who are malnourished," commented Eric Failing, executive director of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference. "Yet this proposed rule, rather than helping to address these issues, will make them far worse."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A new study published Monday in the journal Health Affairs found that people are less likely to die prematurely if they receive federal nutrition assistance, shedding light on the potentially deadly consequences of President Donald Trump's proposal to strip food stamps from millions of low-income Americans.
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the research found, "led to a population-wide reduction of 1-2 percentage points in mortality from all causes and a reduction in specific causes of death among people ages 40-64."
As HuffPost reported, when "looking specifically at deaths of despair--from drug overdoses, alcohol poisoning and suicide--the researchers found that SNAP benefits cut the mortality rate in half, from 1.64% to 0.81%, for people ages 40 to 64."
Rachel West, an economic policy adviser to the House Committee on Education and Labor, said the study confirms the effectiveness of federal food assistance and demonstrates that "cutting SNAP, like Trump is trying to do, will literally result in more people dying before age 65."
"SNAP saves lives," West tweeted.
The study came just days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's proposal to end automatic food stamp eligibility for those receiving other forms of federal and state assistance. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said in July the move would eliminate food stamps benefits for more than three million people.
The proposed rule change could also cause 500,000 children to lose free school meals, the Washington Post reported in September.
"At a time when we're thinking about restricting access to SNAP and its generosity, our [study] speaks to the importance of SNAP to such basic outcomes as mortality," Colleen Heflin, a professor at Syracuse University and co-author of the new study, told HuffPost.
NPR reported last week that most of the 170,000 public comments on the Trump administration's food stamps proposal were negative.
"There is no excuse that in our first world country we have children who are malnourished," commented Eric Failing, executive director of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference. "Yet this proposed rule, rather than helping to address these issues, will make them far worse."
A new study published Monday in the journal Health Affairs found that people are less likely to die prematurely if they receive federal nutrition assistance, shedding light on the potentially deadly consequences of President Donald Trump's proposal to strip food stamps from millions of low-income Americans.
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the research found, "led to a population-wide reduction of 1-2 percentage points in mortality from all causes and a reduction in specific causes of death among people ages 40-64."
As HuffPost reported, when "looking specifically at deaths of despair--from drug overdoses, alcohol poisoning and suicide--the researchers found that SNAP benefits cut the mortality rate in half, from 1.64% to 0.81%, for people ages 40 to 64."
Rachel West, an economic policy adviser to the House Committee on Education and Labor, said the study confirms the effectiveness of federal food assistance and demonstrates that "cutting SNAP, like Trump is trying to do, will literally result in more people dying before age 65."
"SNAP saves lives," West tweeted.
The study came just days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's proposal to end automatic food stamp eligibility for those receiving other forms of federal and state assistance. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said in July the move would eliminate food stamps benefits for more than three million people.
The proposed rule change could also cause 500,000 children to lose free school meals, the Washington Post reported in September.
"At a time when we're thinking about restricting access to SNAP and its generosity, our [study] speaks to the importance of SNAP to such basic outcomes as mortality," Colleen Heflin, a professor at Syracuse University and co-author of the new study, told HuffPost.
NPR reported last week that most of the 170,000 public comments on the Trump administration's food stamps proposal were negative.
"There is no excuse that in our first world country we have children who are malnourished," commented Eric Failing, executive director of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference. "Yet this proposed rule, rather than helping to address these issues, will make them far worse."