Carrying hammers and baby bottles of their own blood, the seven individuals pictures are those who "attempted to convert weapons of mass destruction" after they made their way onto the US Submarine Base in Kings Bay, Georgia on April 4, 2018. (Photo: Kings Bay 7)
Daniel Ellsberg Backs Anti-Nuke Activists Now Facing 25 Years in Prison for Acting to 'Avert a Much Greater Evil'
"The sign they displayed during their action on the base—'The Ultimate Logic of Trident is Omnicide'—is exactly right."
Seven Catholic Worker peace activists go to trial next week facing up to 25 years in prison for a 2018 act of civil disobedience at the U.S. Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia where they initiated a symbolic closing of the Trident nuclear program in order to prevent the omnicide the groups warns is inevitable from such weapons.
The protesters received a public boost of support this week from renowned activist Daniel Ellsberg, whose 1971 leaking of the Pentagon Papers proved a decisive turning point in public U.S. opinion on the Vietnam War.
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants ."
--Daniel Ellsberg
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants who are now on trial for having 'nonviolently and symbolically disarmed the Trident nuclear submarine base at Kings Bay, Georgia,'" Ellsberg said in a statement. "The sign they displayed during their action on the base--'The Ultimate Logic of Trident is Omnicide'--is exactly right."
The demonstrators are claiming in their defense that the threat posed by nuclear weapons systems like the Trident allows for taking illegal actions to prevent greater harm, the necessity defense. Ellsberg endorsed the defense and said the group was, in his view, clearly in the right and that their actions should be seen as "necessary to avert a much greater evil."
"A key point is that without the impact on myself of actions of civil resistance during the Vietnam War like those of the defendants in this case--including those of Father Philip Berrigan, the late husband of the current defendant Elizabeth McAlister, and of Dorothy Day, grandmother of another defendant, Martha Hennessy--I would never have considered revealing the top secret Pentagon Papers: which legal scholars have described as having had, 'arguably at least,' a causal effect in shortening the Vietnam War," Ellsberg said.
McAlister and Hennessy were joined at the action and are joined in the defense by Steve Kelly, Mark Colville, Clare Grady, Patrick O'Neill, and Carmen Trotta. The members of the group are members of the Catholic Worker Movement, an ideology described as "Christian anarchism" which holds that the revolutionary ideals of Jesus Christ supersede the state and other institutions.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood. How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"
--Jeannine Hill Fletcher, Fordham University
The seven entered the naval site on April 4, 2018, the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and took actions intended to "nonviolently and symbolically disarm the Trident nuclear submarine base," including pouring their own blood on the facility to bring attention to the cost of war.
Hennessy told the Catholic News Service in August that she hoped the group would be allowed to make their case to jurors--though she admitted she was far from certain that would happen.
"The bigger question is: Will we be allowed to speak? If limits are put in place, we won't be able to mention pacifism, faith, nuclear weapons, the shedding of blood as sacramental," said Hennessy. "That's what the jury needs to hear. It remains to be seen if they will hear it."
In their mission statement issued after the protest, the seven protesters tied their action to the ongoing struggle against militarism that King was a part of:
Fifty years ago today, April 4, 1968, Dr. King was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee as a reaction to his efforts to address "the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism." We come to Kings Bay to answer the call of the prophet Isaiah (2:4) to "beat swords into plowshares" by disarming the world's deadliest nuclear weapon, the Trident submarine. We repent of the sin of white supremacy that oppresses and takes the lives of people of color here in the United States and throughout the world. We resist militarism that has employed deadly violence to enforce global domination. We believe reparations are required for stolen land, labor and lives.
Theologians interviewed by America Magazine expressed sympathy with the protesters and their ideological mission, though, as Yale Divinity School's Harold W. Attridge pointed out, the protests and their broader application across the world sparked some disagreement.
"It's one thing to say, 'Oh, let's not confront violence with violence,'" said Attridge. "It's another thing to say let's take a stand against the structures that support and foster violence. And nuclear weapons certainly are structures that support and foster violence in a major way."
But Fordham University's Jeannine Hill Fletcher said that such an approach to the demonstrations was short-sighted.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood," said Fletcher. "How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Seven Catholic Worker peace activists go to trial next week facing up to 25 years in prison for a 2018 act of civil disobedience at the U.S. Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia where they initiated a symbolic closing of the Trident nuclear program in order to prevent the omnicide the groups warns is inevitable from such weapons.
The protesters received a public boost of support this week from renowned activist Daniel Ellsberg, whose 1971 leaking of the Pentagon Papers proved a decisive turning point in public U.S. opinion on the Vietnam War.
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants ."
--Daniel Ellsberg
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants who are now on trial for having 'nonviolently and symbolically disarmed the Trident nuclear submarine base at Kings Bay, Georgia,'" Ellsberg said in a statement. "The sign they displayed during their action on the base--'The Ultimate Logic of Trident is Omnicide'--is exactly right."
The demonstrators are claiming in their defense that the threat posed by nuclear weapons systems like the Trident allows for taking illegal actions to prevent greater harm, the necessity defense. Ellsberg endorsed the defense and said the group was, in his view, clearly in the right and that their actions should be seen as "necessary to avert a much greater evil."
"A key point is that without the impact on myself of actions of civil resistance during the Vietnam War like those of the defendants in this case--including those of Father Philip Berrigan, the late husband of the current defendant Elizabeth McAlister, and of Dorothy Day, grandmother of another defendant, Martha Hennessy--I would never have considered revealing the top secret Pentagon Papers: which legal scholars have described as having had, 'arguably at least,' a causal effect in shortening the Vietnam War," Ellsberg said.
McAlister and Hennessy were joined at the action and are joined in the defense by Steve Kelly, Mark Colville, Clare Grady, Patrick O'Neill, and Carmen Trotta. The members of the group are members of the Catholic Worker Movement, an ideology described as "Christian anarchism" which holds that the revolutionary ideals of Jesus Christ supersede the state and other institutions.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood. How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"
--Jeannine Hill Fletcher, Fordham University
The seven entered the naval site on April 4, 2018, the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and took actions intended to "nonviolently and symbolically disarm the Trident nuclear submarine base," including pouring their own blood on the facility to bring attention to the cost of war.
Hennessy told the Catholic News Service in August that she hoped the group would be allowed to make their case to jurors--though she admitted she was far from certain that would happen.
"The bigger question is: Will we be allowed to speak? If limits are put in place, we won't be able to mention pacifism, faith, nuclear weapons, the shedding of blood as sacramental," said Hennessy. "That's what the jury needs to hear. It remains to be seen if they will hear it."
In their mission statement issued after the protest, the seven protesters tied their action to the ongoing struggle against militarism that King was a part of:
Fifty years ago today, April 4, 1968, Dr. King was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee as a reaction to his efforts to address "the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism." We come to Kings Bay to answer the call of the prophet Isaiah (2:4) to "beat swords into plowshares" by disarming the world's deadliest nuclear weapon, the Trident submarine. We repent of the sin of white supremacy that oppresses and takes the lives of people of color here in the United States and throughout the world. We resist militarism that has employed deadly violence to enforce global domination. We believe reparations are required for stolen land, labor and lives.
Theologians interviewed by America Magazine expressed sympathy with the protesters and their ideological mission, though, as Yale Divinity School's Harold W. Attridge pointed out, the protests and their broader application across the world sparked some disagreement.
"It's one thing to say, 'Oh, let's not confront violence with violence,'" said Attridge. "It's another thing to say let's take a stand against the structures that support and foster violence. And nuclear weapons certainly are structures that support and foster violence in a major way."
But Fordham University's Jeannine Hill Fletcher said that such an approach to the demonstrations was short-sighted.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood," said Fletcher. "How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"
Seven Catholic Worker peace activists go to trial next week facing up to 25 years in prison for a 2018 act of civil disobedience at the U.S. Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia where they initiated a symbolic closing of the Trident nuclear program in order to prevent the omnicide the groups warns is inevitable from such weapons.
The protesters received a public boost of support this week from renowned activist Daniel Ellsberg, whose 1971 leaking of the Pentagon Papers proved a decisive turning point in public U.S. opinion on the Vietnam War.
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants ."
--Daniel Ellsberg
"I strongly endorse the action of civil resistance by the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 defendants who are now on trial for having 'nonviolently and symbolically disarmed the Trident nuclear submarine base at Kings Bay, Georgia,'" Ellsberg said in a statement. "The sign they displayed during their action on the base--'The Ultimate Logic of Trident is Omnicide'--is exactly right."
The demonstrators are claiming in their defense that the threat posed by nuclear weapons systems like the Trident allows for taking illegal actions to prevent greater harm, the necessity defense. Ellsberg endorsed the defense and said the group was, in his view, clearly in the right and that their actions should be seen as "necessary to avert a much greater evil."
"A key point is that without the impact on myself of actions of civil resistance during the Vietnam War like those of the defendants in this case--including those of Father Philip Berrigan, the late husband of the current defendant Elizabeth McAlister, and of Dorothy Day, grandmother of another defendant, Martha Hennessy--I would never have considered revealing the top secret Pentagon Papers: which legal scholars have described as having had, 'arguably at least,' a causal effect in shortening the Vietnam War," Ellsberg said.
McAlister and Hennessy were joined at the action and are joined in the defense by Steve Kelly, Mark Colville, Clare Grady, Patrick O'Neill, and Carmen Trotta. The members of the group are members of the Catholic Worker Movement, an ideology described as "Christian anarchism" which holds that the revolutionary ideals of Jesus Christ supersede the state and other institutions.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood. How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"
--Jeannine Hill Fletcher, Fordham University
The seven entered the naval site on April 4, 2018, the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and took actions intended to "nonviolently and symbolically disarm the Trident nuclear submarine base," including pouring their own blood on the facility to bring attention to the cost of war.
Hennessy told the Catholic News Service in August that she hoped the group would be allowed to make their case to jurors--though she admitted she was far from certain that would happen.
"The bigger question is: Will we be allowed to speak? If limits are put in place, we won't be able to mention pacifism, faith, nuclear weapons, the shedding of blood as sacramental," said Hennessy. "That's what the jury needs to hear. It remains to be seen if they will hear it."
In their mission statement issued after the protest, the seven protesters tied their action to the ongoing struggle against militarism that King was a part of:
Fifty years ago today, April 4, 1968, Dr. King was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee as a reaction to his efforts to address "the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism." We come to Kings Bay to answer the call of the prophet Isaiah (2:4) to "beat swords into plowshares" by disarming the world's deadliest nuclear weapon, the Trident submarine. We repent of the sin of white supremacy that oppresses and takes the lives of people of color here in the United States and throughout the world. We resist militarism that has employed deadly violence to enforce global domination. We believe reparations are required for stolen land, labor and lives.
Theologians interviewed by America Magazine expressed sympathy with the protesters and their ideological mission, though, as Yale Divinity School's Harold W. Attridge pointed out, the protests and their broader application across the world sparked some disagreement.
"It's one thing to say, 'Oh, let's not confront violence with violence,'" said Attridge. "It's another thing to say let's take a stand against the structures that support and foster violence. And nuclear weapons certainly are structures that support and foster violence in a major way."
But Fordham University's Jeannine Hill Fletcher said that such an approach to the demonstrations was short-sighted.
"You're scandalized by the sprinkling of blood," said Fletcher. "How come you're not scandalized by the potential of these bombs to actually spill blood around the globe?"