Oct 17, 2019
News on Thursday that U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson reached a deal with the European Union to allow Britain to leave the coalition under the Brexit referendum of 2016 was met with criticism and derision by progressives, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
"It won't bring the country together and should be rejected," Corbyn said of the deal on Twitter Thursday.
Johnson made the deal with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker Thursday. The agreement will go up for a vote in fron of the U.K. Parliament on a special Saturday session.
But opponents of Johnson's approach are prepared to make it an uphill fight.
\u201cFrom what we know, Johnson's negotiated a worse deal than Theresa May. This sell-out deal risks our rights, protections and NHS. It won\u2019t bring the country together and should be rejected.\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1571308203
Labour's shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer expanded on Corbyn's criticism of the deal.
"It is clear that the Johnson deal is a far worse deal than Theresa May's deal," said Starmer. "It paves the way for a decade of deregulation. It gives Johnson licence to slash workers' rights, environmental standards and consumer protections."
According to journalist Paul Mason, a supporter of Corbyn, Labour intends to enter Parliament on Saturday united behind demanding a second referndum on either the Johnson deal or pulling out of Brexit completely.
"That's our strategy, let the people decide," said Mason. "Having achieved that--which I think we can on Saturday--that's the platform for going into an election and ridding this country of this right wing, authoritarian, white nationalist, and English chauvinist government once and for all."
\u201cDefeat the Johnson Deal - Labour will lead the fight for a second referendum on this shabby Brexit deal on Saturday morning ...\u201d— Paul Mason (@Paul Mason) 1571308398
Scottish Nationalist Party leader Nicola Sturgeon also rejected the deal's premise.
"It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland," said Sturgeon.
\u201cNicola Sturgeon on the new Brexit agreement: 'It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland.' https://t.co/tsZIzwSZvV\u201d— STV News (@STV News) 1571318407
The deal, which would go into effect for the current Brexit deadline of October 31, reportedly undoes the hardest sticking point of negotiations, what to do with the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland, by allowing goods to flow through the border after crossing through customs over the Irish Sea.
Johnson's counterpart in Ireland, Taisoeach Leo Varadkar, called the deal a "good agreement" in comments to reporters.
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit. They rejected it."
--Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Fein
"It allows the United Kingdom to leave the European Union in an orderly fashion," said Varadkar.
That sentiment was not, however, shared by others in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
Northern Ireland's hard-right Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), who are relied on by Johnson and the Conservatives to maintain their majority in Parliament, flatly rejected the proposal. Without the DUP's support, passing Brexit becomes even more difficult.
"We have been consistent that we will only ever consider supporting arrangements that are in Northern Ireland's long-term economic and constitutional interests and protect the integrity of the Union," the party said in a statement. "These proposals are not, in our view, beneficial to the economic well-being of Northern Ireland and they undermine the integrity of the Union."
Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein, in a tweet, said that there was "no good Brexit."
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit," Sinn Fein leader Michelle O'Neill said, referring to Northern Irelands vote against the proposal in 2016. "They rejected it."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
News on Thursday that U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson reached a deal with the European Union to allow Britain to leave the coalition under the Brexit referendum of 2016 was met with criticism and derision by progressives, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
"It won't bring the country together and should be rejected," Corbyn said of the deal on Twitter Thursday.
Johnson made the deal with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker Thursday. The agreement will go up for a vote in fron of the U.K. Parliament on a special Saturday session.
But opponents of Johnson's approach are prepared to make it an uphill fight.
\u201cFrom what we know, Johnson's negotiated a worse deal than Theresa May. This sell-out deal risks our rights, protections and NHS. It won\u2019t bring the country together and should be rejected.\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1571308203
Labour's shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer expanded on Corbyn's criticism of the deal.
"It is clear that the Johnson deal is a far worse deal than Theresa May's deal," said Starmer. "It paves the way for a decade of deregulation. It gives Johnson licence to slash workers' rights, environmental standards and consumer protections."
According to journalist Paul Mason, a supporter of Corbyn, Labour intends to enter Parliament on Saturday united behind demanding a second referndum on either the Johnson deal or pulling out of Brexit completely.
"That's our strategy, let the people decide," said Mason. "Having achieved that--which I think we can on Saturday--that's the platform for going into an election and ridding this country of this right wing, authoritarian, white nationalist, and English chauvinist government once and for all."
\u201cDefeat the Johnson Deal - Labour will lead the fight for a second referendum on this shabby Brexit deal on Saturday morning ...\u201d— Paul Mason (@Paul Mason) 1571308398
Scottish Nationalist Party leader Nicola Sturgeon also rejected the deal's premise.
"It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland," said Sturgeon.
\u201cNicola Sturgeon on the new Brexit agreement: 'It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland.' https://t.co/tsZIzwSZvV\u201d— STV News (@STV News) 1571318407
The deal, which would go into effect for the current Brexit deadline of October 31, reportedly undoes the hardest sticking point of negotiations, what to do with the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland, by allowing goods to flow through the border after crossing through customs over the Irish Sea.
Johnson's counterpart in Ireland, Taisoeach Leo Varadkar, called the deal a "good agreement" in comments to reporters.
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit. They rejected it."
--Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Fein
"It allows the United Kingdom to leave the European Union in an orderly fashion," said Varadkar.
That sentiment was not, however, shared by others in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
Northern Ireland's hard-right Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), who are relied on by Johnson and the Conservatives to maintain their majority in Parliament, flatly rejected the proposal. Without the DUP's support, passing Brexit becomes even more difficult.
"We have been consistent that we will only ever consider supporting arrangements that are in Northern Ireland's long-term economic and constitutional interests and protect the integrity of the Union," the party said in a statement. "These proposals are not, in our view, beneficial to the economic well-being of Northern Ireland and they undermine the integrity of the Union."
Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein, in a tweet, said that there was "no good Brexit."
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit," Sinn Fein leader Michelle O'Neill said, referring to Northern Irelands vote against the proposal in 2016. "They rejected it."
News on Thursday that U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson reached a deal with the European Union to allow Britain to leave the coalition under the Brexit referendum of 2016 was met with criticism and derision by progressives, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
"It won't bring the country together and should be rejected," Corbyn said of the deal on Twitter Thursday.
Johnson made the deal with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker Thursday. The agreement will go up for a vote in fron of the U.K. Parliament on a special Saturday session.
But opponents of Johnson's approach are prepared to make it an uphill fight.
\u201cFrom what we know, Johnson's negotiated a worse deal than Theresa May. This sell-out deal risks our rights, protections and NHS. It won\u2019t bring the country together and should be rejected.\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1571308203
Labour's shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer expanded on Corbyn's criticism of the deal.
"It is clear that the Johnson deal is a far worse deal than Theresa May's deal," said Starmer. "It paves the way for a decade of deregulation. It gives Johnson licence to slash workers' rights, environmental standards and consumer protections."
According to journalist Paul Mason, a supporter of Corbyn, Labour intends to enter Parliament on Saturday united behind demanding a second referndum on either the Johnson deal or pulling out of Brexit completely.
"That's our strategy, let the people decide," said Mason. "Having achieved that--which I think we can on Saturday--that's the platform for going into an election and ridding this country of this right wing, authoritarian, white nationalist, and English chauvinist government once and for all."
\u201cDefeat the Johnson Deal - Labour will lead the fight for a second referendum on this shabby Brexit deal on Saturday morning ...\u201d— Paul Mason (@Paul Mason) 1571308398
Scottish Nationalist Party leader Nicola Sturgeon also rejected the deal's premise.
"It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland," said Sturgeon.
\u201cNicola Sturgeon on the new Brexit agreement: 'It's hard to imagine a deal that would be worse for Scotland.' https://t.co/tsZIzwSZvV\u201d— STV News (@STV News) 1571318407
The deal, which would go into effect for the current Brexit deadline of October 31, reportedly undoes the hardest sticking point of negotiations, what to do with the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland, by allowing goods to flow through the border after crossing through customs over the Irish Sea.
Johnson's counterpart in Ireland, Taisoeach Leo Varadkar, called the deal a "good agreement" in comments to reporters.
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit. They rejected it."
--Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Fein
"It allows the United Kingdom to leave the European Union in an orderly fashion," said Varadkar.
That sentiment was not, however, shared by others in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
Northern Ireland's hard-right Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), who are relied on by Johnson and the Conservatives to maintain their majority in Parliament, flatly rejected the proposal. Without the DUP's support, passing Brexit becomes even more difficult.
"We have been consistent that we will only ever consider supporting arrangements that are in Northern Ireland's long-term economic and constitutional interests and protect the integrity of the Union," the party said in a statement. "These proposals are not, in our view, beneficial to the economic well-being of Northern Ireland and they undermine the integrity of the Union."
Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein, in a tweet, said that there was "no good Brexit."
"The people of the north did not consent to Brexit," Sinn Fein leader Michelle O'Neill said, referring to Northern Irelands vote against the proposal in 2016. "They rejected it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.