After President Donald Trump proposed passing immigrants over for green cards if they use public assistance last year, programs including WIC and SNAP reported that fewer immigrant families applied for help. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's 'Racist Wealth Test' Designed to Punish Low-Income Immigrants
Trump's proposed rule was "repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," a federal judge said.
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."