After President Donald Trump proposed passing immigrants over for green cards if they use public assistance last year, programs including WIC and SNAP reported that fewer immigrant families applied for help. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's 'Racist Wealth Test' Designed to Punish Low-Income Immigrants
Trump's proposed rule was "repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," a federal judge said.
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."
Immigrant rights groups applauded a federal judge's ruling on Friday that struck down President Donald Trump's proposal to put even more barriers in front of immigrants by labeling them "burdens" to the U.S. government.
U.S. District Judge George Daniels issued a preliminary injunction on Trump's "public charge" rule, which would have allowed immigration caseworkers to deny visas or green cards to undocumented immigrants if they are seen as likely to use government assistance such as SNAP benefits.
The proposed rule, previously set to go into effect on October 15, "is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification," Daniels wrote in his ruling.
"It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upward mobility," the judge added.
Make the Road New York was among the advocacy groups which, along with several states and cities, filed nearly a dozen lawsuits challenging the rule after it was introduced last year.
The group hailed Daniels's decision as "a major defeat for the Trump administration's unlawful tactic to impose a racist wealth test on our immigration system."
"People should be able to access vital and life-saving benefits without having to worry if they could remain with their families," co-executive director Javier Valdes said in a statement.
The federal government has labeled certain undocumented immigrants as "public charges" for more than a century; in the 1990s, the Clinton administration enforced a rule allowing the label to be applied only to immigrants who would use cash benefits.
Trump proposed extending the rule to people who may need Medicaid, SNAP benefits, public housing assistance, or other benefits. As Common Dreams and other outlets reported last year, providers of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) reported that the president's proposal led to fewer applications for benefits, as families likely feared being targeted by Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
"The big concern for all of us in the WIC community is that this program is really about growing healthy babies," Rev. Douglas Greenaway, president and CEO of the National WIC Association, told Politico at the time.
Some advocates pointed out Friday that Daniels's ruling came just ahead of another federal court decision on Friday barring Trump from enacting his anti-immigration policies.
A U.S. District Court in El Paso, Texas ruled that Trump violated the law when he declared a national emergency in order to build a border wall separating the U.S. from Mexico.
"Good news," the legal services non-profit RAICES tweeted. "The Trump administration has suffered two HUGE loses today in its campaign to dramatically overhaul the nation's immigration system."