Sep 25, 2019
On the same day that legal experts and political opponents proclaimed that President Donald Trump engaged in "blatantly impeachable" offenses--and that even the White House-approved "not-a-transcript" released earlier in the day was itself a "smoking gun" of flagrant violations of campaign finance laws--the president offered rambling, quasi-coherent to the press late Wednesday afternoon as he tried to defend himself for asking the Ukraine president to investigate his 2020 rival Joe Biden.
"Impeachment? For that?" Trump said during the press conference in New York.
\u201cTrump says Democrats planned the latest stage of their \u201cwitch hunt\u201d to coincide with the UN General Assembly to discredit him.\n\n\u201cThat was all planned, like everything else,\u201d he says. \u201cImpeachment, for that?\u201d\u201d— Bloomberg Quicktake (@Bloomberg Quicktake) 1569444662
Asked directly by a reporter if it was appropriate for a sitting U.S. president to ask the leader of a foreign nation to look into his political rivals, Trump said, "I didn't do it."
The call with President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump continued, was "perfect" and a "beautiful conversation."
When it was put to him as a hypothetical--if his predecessor Barack Obama had done something similar to him--Trump falsely claimed that this is something that actually did happen.
\u201cA reporter just asked Trump how he would have reacted if Obama had asked a foreign leader for dirt on him. Trump replied by saying that\u2019s what Obama did. He offers no evidence of course for this ludicrous new lie and none of the reporters present have so far pushed back.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569444949
Throughout Trump's comments he repeatedly accused--again without providing any evidence--that Biden, and his son Hunter Biden, were involved in some kind of corruption in Ukraine--a charge that has not been substantiated but continues to be boldly peddled by Trump, Republican lawmakers, and others in the right-wing echo chamber.
\u201cMSNBC's Nicolle Wallace cuts away from Trump's press conference to fact check his lies.\u201d— PoliticusUSA (@PoliticusUSA) 1569445544
Part of a widening pattern, observers noted how impossible it has become to keep up with Trump's torrent of falsehoods.
Impossible to fact-check so many false and misleading statements in real time, CNN national media corresponder Oliver Darcey re-upped his concern about airing Trump's speeches in real-time--a practice that allows the president to spew lies unchecked to millions of people at a time.
\u201cRelated: I wrote earlier this year about whether networks should air Trump's comments in real-time https://t.co/6AQGIR2pgw\u201d— Oliver Darcy (@Oliver Darcy) 1569443937
As Darcy wrote in a report published earlier this year, "the practice of airing Trump's remarks in real-time ... gives the President a platform to reach millions of people at once and dominate the conversation --and Trump often uses the opportunity to deceive viewers by peddling misinformation and falsehoods."
Shortly after Trump's press conference, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) emerged on Capitol Hill after reading the official whistleblower complaint that sparked the still unfolding controversy and said he found the document "deeply disturbing" and the complaint itself "very credible."
\u201cRep. Adam Schiff: "I've had the opportunity as have members of the committee to read the whistleblower complaint. I found the allegations deeply disturbing. I also found them very credible."\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1569450004
On Thursday, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who had previously barred members from seeing the complaint, will be testifying before the committee.
Watch the entire press conference below:
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On the same day that legal experts and political opponents proclaimed that President Donald Trump engaged in "blatantly impeachable" offenses--and that even the White House-approved "not-a-transcript" released earlier in the day was itself a "smoking gun" of flagrant violations of campaign finance laws--the president offered rambling, quasi-coherent to the press late Wednesday afternoon as he tried to defend himself for asking the Ukraine president to investigate his 2020 rival Joe Biden.
"Impeachment? For that?" Trump said during the press conference in New York.
\u201cTrump says Democrats planned the latest stage of their \u201cwitch hunt\u201d to coincide with the UN General Assembly to discredit him.\n\n\u201cThat was all planned, like everything else,\u201d he says. \u201cImpeachment, for that?\u201d\u201d— Bloomberg Quicktake (@Bloomberg Quicktake) 1569444662
Asked directly by a reporter if it was appropriate for a sitting U.S. president to ask the leader of a foreign nation to look into his political rivals, Trump said, "I didn't do it."
The call with President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump continued, was "perfect" and a "beautiful conversation."
When it was put to him as a hypothetical--if his predecessor Barack Obama had done something similar to him--Trump falsely claimed that this is something that actually did happen.
\u201cA reporter just asked Trump how he would have reacted if Obama had asked a foreign leader for dirt on him. Trump replied by saying that\u2019s what Obama did. He offers no evidence of course for this ludicrous new lie and none of the reporters present have so far pushed back.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569444949
Throughout Trump's comments he repeatedly accused--again without providing any evidence--that Biden, and his son Hunter Biden, were involved in some kind of corruption in Ukraine--a charge that has not been substantiated but continues to be boldly peddled by Trump, Republican lawmakers, and others in the right-wing echo chamber.
\u201cMSNBC's Nicolle Wallace cuts away from Trump's press conference to fact check his lies.\u201d— PoliticusUSA (@PoliticusUSA) 1569445544
Part of a widening pattern, observers noted how impossible it has become to keep up with Trump's torrent of falsehoods.
Impossible to fact-check so many false and misleading statements in real time, CNN national media corresponder Oliver Darcey re-upped his concern about airing Trump's speeches in real-time--a practice that allows the president to spew lies unchecked to millions of people at a time.
\u201cRelated: I wrote earlier this year about whether networks should air Trump's comments in real-time https://t.co/6AQGIR2pgw\u201d— Oliver Darcy (@Oliver Darcy) 1569443937
As Darcy wrote in a report published earlier this year, "the practice of airing Trump's remarks in real-time ... gives the President a platform to reach millions of people at once and dominate the conversation --and Trump often uses the opportunity to deceive viewers by peddling misinformation and falsehoods."
Shortly after Trump's press conference, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) emerged on Capitol Hill after reading the official whistleblower complaint that sparked the still unfolding controversy and said he found the document "deeply disturbing" and the complaint itself "very credible."
\u201cRep. Adam Schiff: "I've had the opportunity as have members of the committee to read the whistleblower complaint. I found the allegations deeply disturbing. I also found them very credible."\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1569450004
On Thursday, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who had previously barred members from seeing the complaint, will be testifying before the committee.
Watch the entire press conference below:
On the same day that legal experts and political opponents proclaimed that President Donald Trump engaged in "blatantly impeachable" offenses--and that even the White House-approved "not-a-transcript" released earlier in the day was itself a "smoking gun" of flagrant violations of campaign finance laws--the president offered rambling, quasi-coherent to the press late Wednesday afternoon as he tried to defend himself for asking the Ukraine president to investigate his 2020 rival Joe Biden.
"Impeachment? For that?" Trump said during the press conference in New York.
\u201cTrump says Democrats planned the latest stage of their \u201cwitch hunt\u201d to coincide with the UN General Assembly to discredit him.\n\n\u201cThat was all planned, like everything else,\u201d he says. \u201cImpeachment, for that?\u201d\u201d— Bloomberg Quicktake (@Bloomberg Quicktake) 1569444662
Asked directly by a reporter if it was appropriate for a sitting U.S. president to ask the leader of a foreign nation to look into his political rivals, Trump said, "I didn't do it."
The call with President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump continued, was "perfect" and a "beautiful conversation."
When it was put to him as a hypothetical--if his predecessor Barack Obama had done something similar to him--Trump falsely claimed that this is something that actually did happen.
\u201cA reporter just asked Trump how he would have reacted if Obama had asked a foreign leader for dirt on him. Trump replied by saying that\u2019s what Obama did. He offers no evidence of course for this ludicrous new lie and none of the reporters present have so far pushed back.\u201d— Mehdi Hasan (@Mehdi Hasan) 1569444949
Throughout Trump's comments he repeatedly accused--again without providing any evidence--that Biden, and his son Hunter Biden, were involved in some kind of corruption in Ukraine--a charge that has not been substantiated but continues to be boldly peddled by Trump, Republican lawmakers, and others in the right-wing echo chamber.
\u201cMSNBC's Nicolle Wallace cuts away from Trump's press conference to fact check his lies.\u201d— PoliticusUSA (@PoliticusUSA) 1569445544
Part of a widening pattern, observers noted how impossible it has become to keep up with Trump's torrent of falsehoods.
Impossible to fact-check so many false and misleading statements in real time, CNN national media corresponder Oliver Darcey re-upped his concern about airing Trump's speeches in real-time--a practice that allows the president to spew lies unchecked to millions of people at a time.
\u201cRelated: I wrote earlier this year about whether networks should air Trump's comments in real-time https://t.co/6AQGIR2pgw\u201d— Oliver Darcy (@Oliver Darcy) 1569443937
As Darcy wrote in a report published earlier this year, "the practice of airing Trump's remarks in real-time ... gives the President a platform to reach millions of people at once and dominate the conversation --and Trump often uses the opportunity to deceive viewers by peddling misinformation and falsehoods."
Shortly after Trump's press conference, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) emerged on Capitol Hill after reading the official whistleblower complaint that sparked the still unfolding controversy and said he found the document "deeply disturbing" and the complaint itself "very credible."
\u201cRep. Adam Schiff: "I've had the opportunity as have members of the committee to read the whistleblower complaint. I found the allegations deeply disturbing. I also found them very credible."\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1569450004
On Thursday, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who had previously barred members from seeing the complaint, will be testifying before the committee.
Watch the entire press conference below:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.