U.S. Border Patrol Agents at Border Field State Park in Imperial Beach watch over personnel that are reinforcing the border wall with concertina wire. (Photo: Mani Albrecht/U.S. Border Patrol/Flickr)
Dem Lawmaker Warns: Whether You Call it a Fence or a Wall, Trump is Winning on the Border
"This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."
In a series of tweets Friday excoriating a recent Washington Post "Fact Checker" column downplaying the rate of President Donald Trump's border wall construction, Rep. Raul Grijalva laid out why the article and similar gotcha attempts are "dangerous."
Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat whose district borders Mexico, was responding to a piece by Post reporter Salvador Rizzo which gave the president three "Pinocchios" for claiming that the wall was under construction when, Rizzo said, the fact is that the administration is simply replacing older sections of existing wall with new fencing instead of building 1,000 miles of promised new barrier.
"Replacing a fence with a 30-foot structure covered in double razor wire and topped with floodlights qualifies as new construction no matter where it happens," tweeted Grijalva. "This is not a time to tell ourselves that Trump is losing. This is being built as we speak."
Grijalva also pointed to a worrying tendency in the media to take short-term, technical victories over Trump while disregarding the reality of the administration's policies and its victims.
"The idea that this doesn't count as 'new wall,' and therefore there's nothing to see here, is dangerous and leads to complacency," said Grijalva. "Thumbing our noses at Trump is no substitute for on-the-ground reporting."
And, the lawmaker said, it's important to remember what the wall means.
"This is an intentional symbol of hate and fear, not a security measure," said Grijalva.
Rizzo, for his part, replied that the Post fact-check relied on distinguishing between "the sturdier steel bollard fencing that is replacing dilapidated old fences from what Trump actually promised: a massive new concrete wall stretching 1,000 miles."
But Grijalva's point was well taken by fellow lawmakers and immigration advocates.
"Thank you Rep. Raul Grivalja for setting the record straight about what is actually happening with the construction of Trump's border wall," Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.) tweeted.
The Post reporting was "very inaccurate and irresponsible" said Wildlands Network's borderlands program director Myles Traphagen.
"Thirty foot wall is being [built] while I write this," Traphagen added.
Grijalva ended his thread by scolding the Post for missing the forest for the trees.
"The conversation about the wall has to be about stopping it and making sure Trump and his successors don't expand it," said Girjalva. "They want this to grow beyond public control. Treating the wall as just a chance to be clever at Trump's expense is irresponsible."