SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
An Amazon Ring camera is pictured at Amazon Headquarters on September 20, 2018 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo: Stephen Brashear/Getty Images)
Fueling Calls for Ban, Even a Security Industry Group Thinks Police Partnerships With Amazon Ring Are Dangerous
"When an industry association that represents security and surveillance camera companies thinks that your practices are too invasive and lack transparency, that really says something."
Aug 09, 2019
A security industry trade group on Wednesday joined civil liberties advocates in denouncing agreements between more than 200 police departments across the U.S. and Amazon Ring, the tech giant's line of home surveillance products.
"This should be setting off alarm bells for local elected officials in the hundreds of cities that already have these partnerships," said Evan Greer, deputy director of digital rights group Fight for the Future.
The Monitoring Association (TMA) said it was "troubled" by Amazon's failure to notify customers that police departments are being called on to promote the company's home video surveillance systems. In return for the free marketing by public servants, Amazon's product allows police access to interactive Ring features which allows them to request footage from homeowners without a warrant.
"We are troubled by recent reports of agreements that are said to drive product-specific promotion, without alerting consumers about these marketing relationships," TMA president Ivan Spector said in a statement, according to a CNET report on Thursday. "This lack of transparency goes against our standards as an industry, diminishes public trust, and takes advantage of these public servants."
Fight for the Future said TMA's comments should be "embarrassing" for Amazon.
"When an industry association that represents security and surveillance camera companies thinks that your practices are too invasive and lack transparency, that really says something," said Greer. "Mayors and city councils should take immediate action to stop these for-profit surveillance deals and have real community dialogues before pursuing anything like this in the future."
Shreyas Gandlur, a student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, published a map Thursday showing 231 towns and cities where police have partnered with Amazon Ring.
According to a study by Motherboard in February, the "neighborhood watch" app which comes with Ring encourages racial profiling. Users are able to upload images from their Ring surveillance footage and identify people in the videos as "suspicious." Motherboard reported that between December 2018 and February 2019, the majority of images labeled "suspicious" in the "virtual gated community" of the Neighbors app were people of color.
"Amazon is building a privately run, for-profit surveillance state--and they're getting local police to market it for them in exchange for VIP access to Amazon's on-demand surveillance system," said Fight for the Future.
Other rights advocates expressed similar concerns about Amazon's surveillance ventures.
\u201cAmazon has a responsibility to ensure that its surveillance technologies \u2013 like Rekognition and Ring \u2013 don\u2019t threaten our civil rights. https://t.co/L36mkzDHVn\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1565291700
\u201cThe unregulated surveillance partnership between Amazon\u2019s Ring and local police is a threat to our privacy, and so is the misleading panic it creates.\n\nhttps://t.co/pvLXcxG83b\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1565287435
Fight for the Future is calling on supporters to demand that local elected officials ban partnerships between police departments and Amazon, noting that as a powerful private company, Amazon has been able to develop a surveillance system that any local lawmaking body would have to approve if local law enforcement pursued the same kind of system.
"Amazon has found the perfect end-run around the democratic process," Fight for the Future said. "But mayors and city officials have the power to stop police from entering into these partnerships, which is why we are calling on local elected officials to ban and stop these deceptive partnerships."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A security industry trade group on Wednesday joined civil liberties advocates in denouncing agreements between more than 200 police departments across the U.S. and Amazon Ring, the tech giant's line of home surveillance products.
"This should be setting off alarm bells for local elected officials in the hundreds of cities that already have these partnerships," said Evan Greer, deputy director of digital rights group Fight for the Future.
The Monitoring Association (TMA) said it was "troubled" by Amazon's failure to notify customers that police departments are being called on to promote the company's home video surveillance systems. In return for the free marketing by public servants, Amazon's product allows police access to interactive Ring features which allows them to request footage from homeowners without a warrant.
"We are troubled by recent reports of agreements that are said to drive product-specific promotion, without alerting consumers about these marketing relationships," TMA president Ivan Spector said in a statement, according to a CNET report on Thursday. "This lack of transparency goes against our standards as an industry, diminishes public trust, and takes advantage of these public servants."
Fight for the Future said TMA's comments should be "embarrassing" for Amazon.
"When an industry association that represents security and surveillance camera companies thinks that your practices are too invasive and lack transparency, that really says something," said Greer. "Mayors and city councils should take immediate action to stop these for-profit surveillance deals and have real community dialogues before pursuing anything like this in the future."
Shreyas Gandlur, a student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, published a map Thursday showing 231 towns and cities where police have partnered with Amazon Ring.
According to a study by Motherboard in February, the "neighborhood watch" app which comes with Ring encourages racial profiling. Users are able to upload images from their Ring surveillance footage and identify people in the videos as "suspicious." Motherboard reported that between December 2018 and February 2019, the majority of images labeled "suspicious" in the "virtual gated community" of the Neighbors app were people of color.
"Amazon is building a privately run, for-profit surveillance state--and they're getting local police to market it for them in exchange for VIP access to Amazon's on-demand surveillance system," said Fight for the Future.
Other rights advocates expressed similar concerns about Amazon's surveillance ventures.
\u201cAmazon has a responsibility to ensure that its surveillance technologies \u2013 like Rekognition and Ring \u2013 don\u2019t threaten our civil rights. https://t.co/L36mkzDHVn\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1565291700
\u201cThe unregulated surveillance partnership between Amazon\u2019s Ring and local police is a threat to our privacy, and so is the misleading panic it creates.\n\nhttps://t.co/pvLXcxG83b\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1565287435
Fight for the Future is calling on supporters to demand that local elected officials ban partnerships between police departments and Amazon, noting that as a powerful private company, Amazon has been able to develop a surveillance system that any local lawmaking body would have to approve if local law enforcement pursued the same kind of system.
"Amazon has found the perfect end-run around the democratic process," Fight for the Future said. "But mayors and city officials have the power to stop police from entering into these partnerships, which is why we are calling on local elected officials to ban and stop these deceptive partnerships."
A security industry trade group on Wednesday joined civil liberties advocates in denouncing agreements between more than 200 police departments across the U.S. and Amazon Ring, the tech giant's line of home surveillance products.
"This should be setting off alarm bells for local elected officials in the hundreds of cities that already have these partnerships," said Evan Greer, deputy director of digital rights group Fight for the Future.
The Monitoring Association (TMA) said it was "troubled" by Amazon's failure to notify customers that police departments are being called on to promote the company's home video surveillance systems. In return for the free marketing by public servants, Amazon's product allows police access to interactive Ring features which allows them to request footage from homeowners without a warrant.
"We are troubled by recent reports of agreements that are said to drive product-specific promotion, without alerting consumers about these marketing relationships," TMA president Ivan Spector said in a statement, according to a CNET report on Thursday. "This lack of transparency goes against our standards as an industry, diminishes public trust, and takes advantage of these public servants."
Fight for the Future said TMA's comments should be "embarrassing" for Amazon.
"When an industry association that represents security and surveillance camera companies thinks that your practices are too invasive and lack transparency, that really says something," said Greer. "Mayors and city councils should take immediate action to stop these for-profit surveillance deals and have real community dialogues before pursuing anything like this in the future."
Shreyas Gandlur, a student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, published a map Thursday showing 231 towns and cities where police have partnered with Amazon Ring.
According to a study by Motherboard in February, the "neighborhood watch" app which comes with Ring encourages racial profiling. Users are able to upload images from their Ring surveillance footage and identify people in the videos as "suspicious." Motherboard reported that between December 2018 and February 2019, the majority of images labeled "suspicious" in the "virtual gated community" of the Neighbors app were people of color.
"Amazon is building a privately run, for-profit surveillance state--and they're getting local police to market it for them in exchange for VIP access to Amazon's on-demand surveillance system," said Fight for the Future.
Other rights advocates expressed similar concerns about Amazon's surveillance ventures.
\u201cAmazon has a responsibility to ensure that its surveillance technologies \u2013 like Rekognition and Ring \u2013 don\u2019t threaten our civil rights. https://t.co/L36mkzDHVn\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1565291700
\u201cThe unregulated surveillance partnership between Amazon\u2019s Ring and local police is a threat to our privacy, and so is the misleading panic it creates.\n\nhttps://t.co/pvLXcxG83b\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1565287435
Fight for the Future is calling on supporters to demand that local elected officials ban partnerships between police departments and Amazon, noting that as a powerful private company, Amazon has been able to develop a surveillance system that any local lawmaking body would have to approve if local law enforcement pursued the same kind of system.
"Amazon has found the perfect end-run around the democratic process," Fight for the Future said. "But mayors and city officials have the power to stop police from entering into these partnerships, which is why we are calling on local elected officials to ban and stop these deceptive partnerships."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.