SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" explaining his motivation for publishing the names of maxed-out San Antonio donors to Trump. (image: screenshot, MSNBC)
Progressives Mock Outrage From the Right After Joaquin Castro Shares Publicly Available Trump Donor Information
"Conservatives are literally more offended by Castro 'targeting' voters than gunmen targeting children."
Aug 07, 2019
A Democratic congressman's tweeting of public information has conservatives apoplectically shrieking about "doxxing"--a claim that progressives are skewering.
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Tuesday listed donors in the city of San Antonio, Texas to President Donald Trump who have "maxed out" their contributions for 2019, calling them out for supporting the president's racist and hateful rhetoric.
A screed allegedly written by a shooter in El Paso over the weekend who killed 22 people in an attack targeting Hispanics was similar in tone to Trump's anti-immigrant speeches.
"Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as 'invaders,'" said Castro.
The names and donations shared by Castro, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, are public information and easily searchable on the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) website.
"Chairman Castro, they don't like it when you name their donors," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a tweet. "The public needs to know who funds racism."
But that didn't stop the president's allies from having a full blown meltdown over the exposure, claiming that publishing the names amounted to "doxxing," or publishing the full private information of the donors. Castro only released the names of the donors.
"It's not as though Castro published anyone's phone number, e-mail address, or home address," said Media Matters for America editor Parker Molloy. "Had he done that, that would be unethical, absolutely."
FEC information is not private, as Axios explained Tuesday evening.
"Anyone who donates over $200 to campaigns must report to the Federal Election Commission," said Axios.
The right-wing reaction to Castro's tweet nevertheless ran the gamut from general disappointed scolding to analogizing posting the names with gun violence.
Publishing publicly available information was "a terrible and dangerous precedent to set," said HuffPost contributor Yashar Ali.
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), who once referred to himself as "David Duke without the baggage," attempted to tie Castro's dissemination of the, again, publicly available names of the president's donors to a 2017 shooting that put Scalise in the hospital.
"It's dangerous, and lives are at stake," said Scalise. "I know this firsthand."
Progressives found the outrage over Castro's sharing of the public information to be at best suspect.
"Apparently the right wing is flipping out because Castro tweeted public information," tweeted privacy activist Kade Crockford. "I thought y'all loved free speech???"
The outrage was hypocritical, said journalist Benjamin Dixon.
"Conservatives are literally more offended by Castro 'targeting' voters than gunmen targeting children," Dixon said.
The right-wing attack on Castro was not in keeping with the "wait and see" approach to the president's racist attacks on four congresswomen of color in July, said activist Bree Newsome.
"Notice how quickly folks jumped on Joaquin Castro's tweet to feign concern about violence when two weeks ago they weren't even sure if chanting for Omar, Presley, AOC and Tlaib to 'go back' was racist," tweeted Newsome.
Splinter's Naomi LaChance was confused as to why sharing the information was generating such a reaction.
"It's totally bizarre," wrote LaChance. "It's certainly in the public interest to know who is willingly sending Trump money."
"I don't have any sympathy for someone who chooses to part with their money in such a freakish manner," added LaChance.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A Democratic congressman's tweeting of public information has conservatives apoplectically shrieking about "doxxing"--a claim that progressives are skewering.
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Tuesday listed donors in the city of San Antonio, Texas to President Donald Trump who have "maxed out" their contributions for 2019, calling them out for supporting the president's racist and hateful rhetoric.
A screed allegedly written by a shooter in El Paso over the weekend who killed 22 people in an attack targeting Hispanics was similar in tone to Trump's anti-immigrant speeches.
"Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as 'invaders,'" said Castro.
The names and donations shared by Castro, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, are public information and easily searchable on the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) website.
"Chairman Castro, they don't like it when you name their donors," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a tweet. "The public needs to know who funds racism."
But that didn't stop the president's allies from having a full blown meltdown over the exposure, claiming that publishing the names amounted to "doxxing," or publishing the full private information of the donors. Castro only released the names of the donors.
"It's not as though Castro published anyone's phone number, e-mail address, or home address," said Media Matters for America editor Parker Molloy. "Had he done that, that would be unethical, absolutely."
FEC information is not private, as Axios explained Tuesday evening.
"Anyone who donates over $200 to campaigns must report to the Federal Election Commission," said Axios.
The right-wing reaction to Castro's tweet nevertheless ran the gamut from general disappointed scolding to analogizing posting the names with gun violence.
Publishing publicly available information was "a terrible and dangerous precedent to set," said HuffPost contributor Yashar Ali.
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), who once referred to himself as "David Duke without the baggage," attempted to tie Castro's dissemination of the, again, publicly available names of the president's donors to a 2017 shooting that put Scalise in the hospital.
"It's dangerous, and lives are at stake," said Scalise. "I know this firsthand."
Progressives found the outrage over Castro's sharing of the public information to be at best suspect.
"Apparently the right wing is flipping out because Castro tweeted public information," tweeted privacy activist Kade Crockford. "I thought y'all loved free speech???"
The outrage was hypocritical, said journalist Benjamin Dixon.
"Conservatives are literally more offended by Castro 'targeting' voters than gunmen targeting children," Dixon said.
The right-wing attack on Castro was not in keeping with the "wait and see" approach to the president's racist attacks on four congresswomen of color in July, said activist Bree Newsome.
"Notice how quickly folks jumped on Joaquin Castro's tweet to feign concern about violence when two weeks ago they weren't even sure if chanting for Omar, Presley, AOC and Tlaib to 'go back' was racist," tweeted Newsome.
Splinter's Naomi LaChance was confused as to why sharing the information was generating such a reaction.
"It's totally bizarre," wrote LaChance. "It's certainly in the public interest to know who is willingly sending Trump money."
"I don't have any sympathy for someone who chooses to part with their money in such a freakish manner," added LaChance.
A Democratic congressman's tweeting of public information has conservatives apoplectically shrieking about "doxxing"--a claim that progressives are skewering.
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Tuesday listed donors in the city of San Antonio, Texas to President Donald Trump who have "maxed out" their contributions for 2019, calling them out for supporting the president's racist and hateful rhetoric.
A screed allegedly written by a shooter in El Paso over the weekend who killed 22 people in an attack targeting Hispanics was similar in tone to Trump's anti-immigrant speeches.
"Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as 'invaders,'" said Castro.
The names and donations shared by Castro, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, are public information and easily searchable on the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) website.
"Chairman Castro, they don't like it when you name their donors," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a tweet. "The public needs to know who funds racism."
But that didn't stop the president's allies from having a full blown meltdown over the exposure, claiming that publishing the names amounted to "doxxing," or publishing the full private information of the donors. Castro only released the names of the donors.
"It's not as though Castro published anyone's phone number, e-mail address, or home address," said Media Matters for America editor Parker Molloy. "Had he done that, that would be unethical, absolutely."
FEC information is not private, as Axios explained Tuesday evening.
"Anyone who donates over $200 to campaigns must report to the Federal Election Commission," said Axios.
The right-wing reaction to Castro's tweet nevertheless ran the gamut from general disappointed scolding to analogizing posting the names with gun violence.
Publishing publicly available information was "a terrible and dangerous precedent to set," said HuffPost contributor Yashar Ali.
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), who once referred to himself as "David Duke without the baggage," attempted to tie Castro's dissemination of the, again, publicly available names of the president's donors to a 2017 shooting that put Scalise in the hospital.
"It's dangerous, and lives are at stake," said Scalise. "I know this firsthand."
Progressives found the outrage over Castro's sharing of the public information to be at best suspect.
"Apparently the right wing is flipping out because Castro tweeted public information," tweeted privacy activist Kade Crockford. "I thought y'all loved free speech???"
The outrage was hypocritical, said journalist Benjamin Dixon.
"Conservatives are literally more offended by Castro 'targeting' voters than gunmen targeting children," Dixon said.
The right-wing attack on Castro was not in keeping with the "wait and see" approach to the president's racist attacks on four congresswomen of color in July, said activist Bree Newsome.
"Notice how quickly folks jumped on Joaquin Castro's tweet to feign concern about violence when two weeks ago they weren't even sure if chanting for Omar, Presley, AOC and Tlaib to 'go back' was racist," tweeted Newsome.
Splinter's Naomi LaChance was confused as to why sharing the information was generating such a reaction.
"It's totally bizarre," wrote LaChance. "It's certainly in the public interest to know who is willingly sending Trump money."
"I don't have any sympathy for someone who chooses to part with their money in such a freakish manner," added LaChance.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy