Demonstrators seen holding placards during the "Stop The Bans Day of Action for Abortion Rights" rally in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
'We Cannot Overstate the Harm This Decision Will Have': Oklahoma Judge Upholds Ban on Common Abortion Procedure
"We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."