Women and men hold signs during a protest against recently passed abortion ban bills at the Georgia State Capitol building on May 21, 2019 in Atlanta. (Photo: Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)
Jun 05, 2019
As reproductive rights advocates fight a recent upswell in extremist state abortion bans, the nation's largest association for doctors specializing in women's health on Wednesday warned against using the misleading language deployed by the anti-choice movement.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) told reporters that so-called "heartbeat bills" which have passed in Georgia, Alabama, and Ohio in recent weeks should be referred to as "six-week abortion bans."
Using the term "heartbeat bill," as the mostly-Republican lawmakers who have pushed the regulations have, suggests that doctors can actually detect a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy.
In fact, ACOG President Dr. Ted Anderson told The Guardian, "what is interpreted as a heartbeat in these bills is actually electrically induced flickering of a portion of the fetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops."
The six-week cut-off which has been pushed in several states is "arbitrary," added Anderson, and "[does] not reflect medical accuracy or clinical understanding."
Other critics have made similar arguments, saying the anti-choice movement is interested not in protecting fetuses and six-week-old embryos but in controlling women's reproductive choices and attacking Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which affirmed that American women have the right to abortion care.
\u201cTimely reminder: the rhythm a doctor can pick up on an ultrasound at six weeks isn\u2019t a heartbeat, because the embryo has no heart. https://t.co/ZvqOQku5Gp\u201d— Popular Science (@Popular Science) 1559252672
ACOG's recommendation came a day after the United Nations deputy commissioner on human rights, Kate Gilmore, denounced recent anti-choice laws in the U.S. as products of "extremist hate" aimed at women and called on rights advocates "to stand with the evidence and facts and in solidarity with women."
As women's rights advocate and author Rebecca Solnit wrote in The Guardian this week, the anti-choice movement has recently gained ground in its effort to curtail women's reproductive rights through the use of blatant lies about abortion care, specifically their claim that women and doctors commit infanticide during rare abortions which take place in the last trimester of pregnancy--often when the pregnant patient's life or health is at risk or when fetal abnormalities have been detected.
With its warning on Wednesday, ACOG suggested that misleading language about abortions early in pregnancy are part of that strategy as well.
"Anti-abortion laws are built on anti-abortion lies," wrote Solnit. "Lies about things like who has abortions, how abortions work, how women's bodies work, and how fetuses develop. The lies pave the way for the laws."
"To defeat the laws," Solnit added, "we must fight the lies."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As reproductive rights advocates fight a recent upswell in extremist state abortion bans, the nation's largest association for doctors specializing in women's health on Wednesday warned against using the misleading language deployed by the anti-choice movement.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) told reporters that so-called "heartbeat bills" which have passed in Georgia, Alabama, and Ohio in recent weeks should be referred to as "six-week abortion bans."
Using the term "heartbeat bill," as the mostly-Republican lawmakers who have pushed the regulations have, suggests that doctors can actually detect a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy.
In fact, ACOG President Dr. Ted Anderson told The Guardian, "what is interpreted as a heartbeat in these bills is actually electrically induced flickering of a portion of the fetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops."
The six-week cut-off which has been pushed in several states is "arbitrary," added Anderson, and "[does] not reflect medical accuracy or clinical understanding."
Other critics have made similar arguments, saying the anti-choice movement is interested not in protecting fetuses and six-week-old embryos but in controlling women's reproductive choices and attacking Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which affirmed that American women have the right to abortion care.
\u201cTimely reminder: the rhythm a doctor can pick up on an ultrasound at six weeks isn\u2019t a heartbeat, because the embryo has no heart. https://t.co/ZvqOQku5Gp\u201d— Popular Science (@Popular Science) 1559252672
ACOG's recommendation came a day after the United Nations deputy commissioner on human rights, Kate Gilmore, denounced recent anti-choice laws in the U.S. as products of "extremist hate" aimed at women and called on rights advocates "to stand with the evidence and facts and in solidarity with women."
As women's rights advocate and author Rebecca Solnit wrote in The Guardian this week, the anti-choice movement has recently gained ground in its effort to curtail women's reproductive rights through the use of blatant lies about abortion care, specifically their claim that women and doctors commit infanticide during rare abortions which take place in the last trimester of pregnancy--often when the pregnant patient's life or health is at risk or when fetal abnormalities have been detected.
With its warning on Wednesday, ACOG suggested that misleading language about abortions early in pregnancy are part of that strategy as well.
"Anti-abortion laws are built on anti-abortion lies," wrote Solnit. "Lies about things like who has abortions, how abortions work, how women's bodies work, and how fetuses develop. The lies pave the way for the laws."
"To defeat the laws," Solnit added, "we must fight the lies."
As reproductive rights advocates fight a recent upswell in extremist state abortion bans, the nation's largest association for doctors specializing in women's health on Wednesday warned against using the misleading language deployed by the anti-choice movement.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) told reporters that so-called "heartbeat bills" which have passed in Georgia, Alabama, and Ohio in recent weeks should be referred to as "six-week abortion bans."
Using the term "heartbeat bill," as the mostly-Republican lawmakers who have pushed the regulations have, suggests that doctors can actually detect a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy.
In fact, ACOG President Dr. Ted Anderson told The Guardian, "what is interpreted as a heartbeat in these bills is actually electrically induced flickering of a portion of the fetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops."
The six-week cut-off which has been pushed in several states is "arbitrary," added Anderson, and "[does] not reflect medical accuracy or clinical understanding."
Other critics have made similar arguments, saying the anti-choice movement is interested not in protecting fetuses and six-week-old embryos but in controlling women's reproductive choices and attacking Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which affirmed that American women have the right to abortion care.
\u201cTimely reminder: the rhythm a doctor can pick up on an ultrasound at six weeks isn\u2019t a heartbeat, because the embryo has no heart. https://t.co/ZvqOQku5Gp\u201d— Popular Science (@Popular Science) 1559252672
ACOG's recommendation came a day after the United Nations deputy commissioner on human rights, Kate Gilmore, denounced recent anti-choice laws in the U.S. as products of "extremist hate" aimed at women and called on rights advocates "to stand with the evidence and facts and in solidarity with women."
As women's rights advocate and author Rebecca Solnit wrote in The Guardian this week, the anti-choice movement has recently gained ground in its effort to curtail women's reproductive rights through the use of blatant lies about abortion care, specifically their claim that women and doctors commit infanticide during rare abortions which take place in the last trimester of pregnancy--often when the pregnant patient's life or health is at risk or when fetal abnormalities have been detected.
With its warning on Wednesday, ACOG suggested that misleading language about abortions early in pregnancy are part of that strategy as well.
"Anti-abortion laws are built on anti-abortion lies," wrote Solnit. "Lies about things like who has abortions, how abortions work, how women's bodies work, and how fetuses develop. The lies pave the way for the laws."
"To defeat the laws," Solnit added, "we must fight the lies."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.