SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), an anti-choice Democrat, is facing a progressive primary challenge from Marie Newman. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Under Fire From Progressives, DCCC Chair Backs Out of Fundraiser for Anti-Choice Democrat Dan Lipinski
"Rep. Lipinski does not represent the priorities of our community," said Marie Newman, who is mounting a progressive primary challenge against the conservative Illinois Democrat
May 23, 2019
After facing intense backlash from progressives for planning to star at a fundraiser for an anti-choice Democrat amid a wave of Republican attacks on abortion rights, DCCC chair Cheri Bustos announced late Wednesday that she has decided to back out of the high-dollar event.
"I'm proud to have a 100 percent pro-choice voting record and I'm deeply alarmed by the rapidly escalating attacks on women's access to reproductive care in several states," Bustos, a congresswoman from Illinois, said in a statement announcing her withdrawal from the fundraiser for Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), who is facing a progressive primary challenge from Marie Newman.
"When we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever."
--Kelley Robinson, Planned Parenthood Action Fund
"While Congressman Lipinski and I do not agree on women's reproductive healthcare," said Bustos, "this does not change how I will work as DCCC chair to protect our big tent Democratic caucus."
Bustos's decision to drop out of the planned $1,000-per-person fundraiser for Lipinski comes as Republicans are racing to overturn Roe v. Wade with state-level attacks on abortion rights in Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and elsewhere.
Speaking to the New York Times, Lipinski said he doesn't blame Bustos for backing out of the event and complained that "there are people in the party who are not tolerant" of his anti-choice views.
Newman, who narrowly lost to Lipinski in the 2018 midterms, tweeted late Wednesday that Lipinski "does not represent the priorities of our community."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund (PPAF)--which joined other progressive organizations in endorsing Newman earlier this month despite the DCCC's widely decried policy of blacklisting groups that support primary challengers--applauded Bustos for canceling her appearance at the Lipinski fundraiser and reiterated its support for his opponent.
"Now, when we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever," Kelley Robinson, PPAF executive director, said in a statement. "Planned Parenthood Action Fund proudly endorsed reproductive health and rights champion Marie Newman earlier this month and looks forward to ensuring her victory next year."
While progressives approved of Bustos's decision to drop out of the Lipinski event, some wondered why she planned to attend the fundraiser in the first place.
"The head of the DCCC was really going to hold a fundraiser for an anti-choice candidate when women's health is under attack in state after state," tweeted progressive consultant Rebecca Katz. "The Dems put themselves here. They could be the party of the future, of big bold ideas. Instead, they'd rather side with their old and out-of-touch incumbents."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the first member of Congress to publicly criticize Bustos over the Lipinski fundraiser, called the DCCC chair's decision a "smart move."
"I'm glad she is listening to progressive voices," Khanna said in a statement. "I hope she'll take the same approach on the vendor blacklist issue. I remain committed to sitting down with her and seeking a principled compromise."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After facing intense backlash from progressives for planning to star at a fundraiser for an anti-choice Democrat amid a wave of Republican attacks on abortion rights, DCCC chair Cheri Bustos announced late Wednesday that she has decided to back out of the high-dollar event.
"I'm proud to have a 100 percent pro-choice voting record and I'm deeply alarmed by the rapidly escalating attacks on women's access to reproductive care in several states," Bustos, a congresswoman from Illinois, said in a statement announcing her withdrawal from the fundraiser for Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), who is facing a progressive primary challenge from Marie Newman.
"When we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever."
--Kelley Robinson, Planned Parenthood Action Fund
"While Congressman Lipinski and I do not agree on women's reproductive healthcare," said Bustos, "this does not change how I will work as DCCC chair to protect our big tent Democratic caucus."
Bustos's decision to drop out of the planned $1,000-per-person fundraiser for Lipinski comes as Republicans are racing to overturn Roe v. Wade with state-level attacks on abortion rights in Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and elsewhere.
Speaking to the New York Times, Lipinski said he doesn't blame Bustos for backing out of the event and complained that "there are people in the party who are not tolerant" of his anti-choice views.
Newman, who narrowly lost to Lipinski in the 2018 midterms, tweeted late Wednesday that Lipinski "does not represent the priorities of our community."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund (PPAF)--which joined other progressive organizations in endorsing Newman earlier this month despite the DCCC's widely decried policy of blacklisting groups that support primary challengers--applauded Bustos for canceling her appearance at the Lipinski fundraiser and reiterated its support for his opponent.
"Now, when we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever," Kelley Robinson, PPAF executive director, said in a statement. "Planned Parenthood Action Fund proudly endorsed reproductive health and rights champion Marie Newman earlier this month and looks forward to ensuring her victory next year."
While progressives approved of Bustos's decision to drop out of the Lipinski event, some wondered why she planned to attend the fundraiser in the first place.
"The head of the DCCC was really going to hold a fundraiser for an anti-choice candidate when women's health is under attack in state after state," tweeted progressive consultant Rebecca Katz. "The Dems put themselves here. They could be the party of the future, of big bold ideas. Instead, they'd rather side with their old and out-of-touch incumbents."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the first member of Congress to publicly criticize Bustos over the Lipinski fundraiser, called the DCCC chair's decision a "smart move."
"I'm glad she is listening to progressive voices," Khanna said in a statement. "I hope she'll take the same approach on the vendor blacklist issue. I remain committed to sitting down with her and seeking a principled compromise."
After facing intense backlash from progressives for planning to star at a fundraiser for an anti-choice Democrat amid a wave of Republican attacks on abortion rights, DCCC chair Cheri Bustos announced late Wednesday that she has decided to back out of the high-dollar event.
"I'm proud to have a 100 percent pro-choice voting record and I'm deeply alarmed by the rapidly escalating attacks on women's access to reproductive care in several states," Bustos, a congresswoman from Illinois, said in a statement announcing her withdrawal from the fundraiser for Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), who is facing a progressive primary challenge from Marie Newman.
"When we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever."
--Kelley Robinson, Planned Parenthood Action Fund
"While Congressman Lipinski and I do not agree on women's reproductive healthcare," said Bustos, "this does not change how I will work as DCCC chair to protect our big tent Democratic caucus."
Bustos's decision to drop out of the planned $1,000-per-person fundraiser for Lipinski comes as Republicans are racing to overturn Roe v. Wade with state-level attacks on abortion rights in Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and elsewhere.
Speaking to the New York Times, Lipinski said he doesn't blame Bustos for backing out of the event and complained that "there are people in the party who are not tolerant" of his anti-choice views.
Newman, who narrowly lost to Lipinski in the 2018 midterms, tweeted late Wednesday that Lipinski "does not represent the priorities of our community."
Planned Parenthood Action Fund (PPAF)--which joined other progressive organizations in endorsing Newman earlier this month despite the DCCC's widely decried policy of blacklisting groups that support primary challengers--applauded Bustos for canceling her appearance at the Lipinski fundraiser and reiterated its support for his opponent.
"Now, when we're seeing a rash of abortion bans sweeping the country with the goal of challenging Roe v. Wade, the work of electing officials who support access to safe, legal abortion is more important than ever," Kelley Robinson, PPAF executive director, said in a statement. "Planned Parenthood Action Fund proudly endorsed reproductive health and rights champion Marie Newman earlier this month and looks forward to ensuring her victory next year."
While progressives approved of Bustos's decision to drop out of the Lipinski event, some wondered why she planned to attend the fundraiser in the first place.
"The head of the DCCC was really going to hold a fundraiser for an anti-choice candidate when women's health is under attack in state after state," tweeted progressive consultant Rebecca Katz. "The Dems put themselves here. They could be the party of the future, of big bold ideas. Instead, they'd rather side with their old and out-of-touch incumbents."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the first member of Congress to publicly criticize Bustos over the Lipinski fundraiser, called the DCCC chair's decision a "smart move."
"I'm glad she is listening to progressive voices," Khanna said in a statement. "I hope she'll take the same approach on the vendor blacklist issue. I remain committed to sitting down with her and seeking a principled compromise."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.