

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, vetoed an anti-abortion bill on Thursday. (Photo: North Carolina Department of Transportation/Flickr/cc)
Reproductive rights advocates praised North Carolina's Democratic governor for blocking an anti-abortion bill and pushing back against right-wing "propaganda"--though it remains possible that state lawmakers will override his veto.
"This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
--Gov. Roy Cooper
Gov. Roy Cooper announced Thursday that he was vetoing the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," or Senate Bill 359 (pdf).
"Laws already protect newborn babies and this bill is an unnecessary interference between doctors and their patients," Cooper said in a statement. "This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
Applauding the governor's decision, the state's Democratic Party tweeted, "SB 359 is a partisan bill grounded in anti-choice rhetoric, not medical science."
Both national and local rights groups celebrated Cooper's move.
"Victory for reproductive freedom!" declared the ACLU of North Carolina.
"Thank you to [Gov. Cooper] for vetoing this extreme legislation," NARAL Pro-Choice America said on Twitter, "AND dispelling anti-choice propaganda!"
"Wow--this is huge," said Planned Parenthood Action. The group thanked Cooper "for standing up for healthcare providers in North Carolina and vetoing a bill that was based in neither science nor reality."
The Center for Reproductive Rights also welcomed the news, charging that the blocked bill was designed to "shame and intimidate people who seek and provide abortion."
The group noted that Cooper's decision comes after a federal judge last month struck down another anti-choice measure, which banned abortion after 20 weeks except for medical emergencies.
While critics of the bill celebrated a win on Thursday, there is still uncertainty about whether Cooper's veto will stick.
The News & Observer pointed out Thursday that "nearly all of Cooper's previous vetoes have been overridden by the legislature, although this is the first bill he has vetoed since Democrats flipped enough seats in the 2018 elections to take away Republicans' veto-proof supermajority."
As the Raleigh-based newspaper reported:
Now, Republicans will need at least some Democrats to join them to override Cooper's veto.
While normal bills only require a simple majority to pass, veto overrides require support from 60 percent of the legislators present. When the bill passed the House and the Senate earlier this week, it did not gain 60 percent support in either chamber.
However, neither vote was taken with all legislators present, so it's unclear what might happen if an override vote is called in the future.
Only two Democrats in the Senate and four in the House voted in favor of the bill, according to Bloomberg, so "supporters likely would need another few House Democrats to join them to complete an override of the veto."
The fight in North Carolina comes as Republican state legislators across the country continue to roll back reproductive rights. Georgia recently enacted a "heartbeat bill," which bans the abortion after about six weeks, and lawmakers in Texas are considering a proposal to subject women to the death penalty if they terminate a pregnancy.
There is also an ongoing effort to restrict abortion through congressional action. Earlier this month, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was widely condemned by reproductive rights advocates for hosting a hearing on his bill to ban the procedure after 20 weeks. Dr. Kristyn Brandi of Physicians for Reproductive Health accused him and other anti-choice lawmakers of using the hearing "to spread misinformation and stigma about abortion care."
Many activists and political observers argue that these ultra-restrictive measures are part of a broad, obvious ploy to force the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade decision that affirmed the constitutional right to safe, legal abortion.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Reproductive rights advocates praised North Carolina's Democratic governor for blocking an anti-abortion bill and pushing back against right-wing "propaganda"--though it remains possible that state lawmakers will override his veto.
"This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
--Gov. Roy Cooper
Gov. Roy Cooper announced Thursday that he was vetoing the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," or Senate Bill 359 (pdf).
"Laws already protect newborn babies and this bill is an unnecessary interference between doctors and their patients," Cooper said in a statement. "This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
Applauding the governor's decision, the state's Democratic Party tweeted, "SB 359 is a partisan bill grounded in anti-choice rhetoric, not medical science."
Both national and local rights groups celebrated Cooper's move.
"Victory for reproductive freedom!" declared the ACLU of North Carolina.
"Thank you to [Gov. Cooper] for vetoing this extreme legislation," NARAL Pro-Choice America said on Twitter, "AND dispelling anti-choice propaganda!"
"Wow--this is huge," said Planned Parenthood Action. The group thanked Cooper "for standing up for healthcare providers in North Carolina and vetoing a bill that was based in neither science nor reality."
The Center for Reproductive Rights also welcomed the news, charging that the blocked bill was designed to "shame and intimidate people who seek and provide abortion."
The group noted that Cooper's decision comes after a federal judge last month struck down another anti-choice measure, which banned abortion after 20 weeks except for medical emergencies.
While critics of the bill celebrated a win on Thursday, there is still uncertainty about whether Cooper's veto will stick.
The News & Observer pointed out Thursday that "nearly all of Cooper's previous vetoes have been overridden by the legislature, although this is the first bill he has vetoed since Democrats flipped enough seats in the 2018 elections to take away Republicans' veto-proof supermajority."
As the Raleigh-based newspaper reported:
Now, Republicans will need at least some Democrats to join them to override Cooper's veto.
While normal bills only require a simple majority to pass, veto overrides require support from 60 percent of the legislators present. When the bill passed the House and the Senate earlier this week, it did not gain 60 percent support in either chamber.
However, neither vote was taken with all legislators present, so it's unclear what might happen if an override vote is called in the future.
Only two Democrats in the Senate and four in the House voted in favor of the bill, according to Bloomberg, so "supporters likely would need another few House Democrats to join them to complete an override of the veto."
The fight in North Carolina comes as Republican state legislators across the country continue to roll back reproductive rights. Georgia recently enacted a "heartbeat bill," which bans the abortion after about six weeks, and lawmakers in Texas are considering a proposal to subject women to the death penalty if they terminate a pregnancy.
There is also an ongoing effort to restrict abortion through congressional action. Earlier this month, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was widely condemned by reproductive rights advocates for hosting a hearing on his bill to ban the procedure after 20 weeks. Dr. Kristyn Brandi of Physicians for Reproductive Health accused him and other anti-choice lawmakers of using the hearing "to spread misinformation and stigma about abortion care."
Many activists and political observers argue that these ultra-restrictive measures are part of a broad, obvious ploy to force the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade decision that affirmed the constitutional right to safe, legal abortion.
Reproductive rights advocates praised North Carolina's Democratic governor for blocking an anti-abortion bill and pushing back against right-wing "propaganda"--though it remains possible that state lawmakers will override his veto.
"This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
--Gov. Roy Cooper
Gov. Roy Cooper announced Thursday that he was vetoing the so-called "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," or Senate Bill 359 (pdf).
"Laws already protect newborn babies and this bill is an unnecessary interference between doctors and their patients," Cooper said in a statement. "This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other healthcare providers for a practice that simply does not exist."
Applauding the governor's decision, the state's Democratic Party tweeted, "SB 359 is a partisan bill grounded in anti-choice rhetoric, not medical science."
Both national and local rights groups celebrated Cooper's move.
"Victory for reproductive freedom!" declared the ACLU of North Carolina.
"Thank you to [Gov. Cooper] for vetoing this extreme legislation," NARAL Pro-Choice America said on Twitter, "AND dispelling anti-choice propaganda!"
"Wow--this is huge," said Planned Parenthood Action. The group thanked Cooper "for standing up for healthcare providers in North Carolina and vetoing a bill that was based in neither science nor reality."
The Center for Reproductive Rights also welcomed the news, charging that the blocked bill was designed to "shame and intimidate people who seek and provide abortion."
The group noted that Cooper's decision comes after a federal judge last month struck down another anti-choice measure, which banned abortion after 20 weeks except for medical emergencies.
While critics of the bill celebrated a win on Thursday, there is still uncertainty about whether Cooper's veto will stick.
The News & Observer pointed out Thursday that "nearly all of Cooper's previous vetoes have been overridden by the legislature, although this is the first bill he has vetoed since Democrats flipped enough seats in the 2018 elections to take away Republicans' veto-proof supermajority."
As the Raleigh-based newspaper reported:
Now, Republicans will need at least some Democrats to join them to override Cooper's veto.
While normal bills only require a simple majority to pass, veto overrides require support from 60 percent of the legislators present. When the bill passed the House and the Senate earlier this week, it did not gain 60 percent support in either chamber.
However, neither vote was taken with all legislators present, so it's unclear what might happen if an override vote is called in the future.
Only two Democrats in the Senate and four in the House voted in favor of the bill, according to Bloomberg, so "supporters likely would need another few House Democrats to join them to complete an override of the veto."
The fight in North Carolina comes as Republican state legislators across the country continue to roll back reproductive rights. Georgia recently enacted a "heartbeat bill," which bans the abortion after about six weeks, and lawmakers in Texas are considering a proposal to subject women to the death penalty if they terminate a pregnancy.
There is also an ongoing effort to restrict abortion through congressional action. Earlier this month, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was widely condemned by reproductive rights advocates for hosting a hearing on his bill to ban the procedure after 20 weeks. Dr. Kristyn Brandi of Physicians for Reproductive Health accused him and other anti-choice lawmakers of using the hearing "to spread misinformation and stigma about abortion care."
Many activists and political observers argue that these ultra-restrictive measures are part of a broad, obvious ploy to force the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its landmark Roe v. Wade decision that affirmed the constitutional right to safe, legal abortion.