

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jane Perkins, legal director of the National Health Law Program, said it is "nonsensical and illegal to add obstacles to Medicaid for large groups of individuals who are already working, or full-time healthcare providers for family members, or suffering chronic health matters." (Photo: Carlos Barria/Reuters)
A federal judge Wednesday blocked Trump-approved Medicaid work requirements in Kentucky and Arkansas, where the punitive rules have already caused immense suffering and stripped healthcare from thousands of low-income Americans.
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone."
--Chuck Idelson, National Nurses United
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone," wrote Chuck Idelson of National Nurses United.
In his twin rulings, Judge James E. Boasberg found that the Trump administration failed to adequately consider the coverage losses that would result from imposing work requirements on Medicaid recipients.
Jane Perkins, legal director of the National Health Law Program, said it is "nonsensical and illegal to add obstacles to Medicaid for large groups of individuals who are already working, or full-time healthcare providers for family members, or suffering chronic health matters."
"Work should not be a key to healthcare access," Perkins added.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) tweeted: "All along this was a scheme to take away people's healthcare, nothing more."
The judge's ruling comes as reports of the devastating consequences of Medicaid work requirements continue to emerge.
In Arkansas alone, more than 18,000 people lost Medicaid coverage in 2018 due to the state's new work requirements.
"This cruel, stupid, vindictive idea is working out just as awfully as you would imagine," Splinter's Hamilton Nolan wrote Wednesday.
Undeterred by court rulings, the Trump administration is continuing to "aggressively" push work requirements in several other states, including New Hampshire, noted Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein.
"If the Trump administration really believed in healthcare," tweeted advocacy group Protect Our Care, "they would learn their lesson and abandon their war on the healthcare of millions of Americans."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal judge Wednesday blocked Trump-approved Medicaid work requirements in Kentucky and Arkansas, where the punitive rules have already caused immense suffering and stripped healthcare from thousands of low-income Americans.
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone."
--Chuck Idelson, National Nurses United
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone," wrote Chuck Idelson of National Nurses United.
In his twin rulings, Judge James E. Boasberg found that the Trump administration failed to adequately consider the coverage losses that would result from imposing work requirements on Medicaid recipients.
Jane Perkins, legal director of the National Health Law Program, said it is "nonsensical and illegal to add obstacles to Medicaid for large groups of individuals who are already working, or full-time healthcare providers for family members, or suffering chronic health matters."
"Work should not be a key to healthcare access," Perkins added.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) tweeted: "All along this was a scheme to take away people's healthcare, nothing more."
The judge's ruling comes as reports of the devastating consequences of Medicaid work requirements continue to emerge.
In Arkansas alone, more than 18,000 people lost Medicaid coverage in 2018 due to the state's new work requirements.
"This cruel, stupid, vindictive idea is working out just as awfully as you would imagine," Splinter's Hamilton Nolan wrote Wednesday.
Undeterred by court rulings, the Trump administration is continuing to "aggressively" push work requirements in several other states, including New Hampshire, noted Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein.
"If the Trump administration really believed in healthcare," tweeted advocacy group Protect Our Care, "they would learn their lesson and abandon their war on the healthcare of millions of Americans."
A federal judge Wednesday blocked Trump-approved Medicaid work requirements in Kentucky and Arkansas, where the punitive rules have already caused immense suffering and stripped healthcare from thousands of low-income Americans.
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone."
--Chuck Idelson, National Nurses United
"Putting restrictions on anyone's healthcare is inhumane. And the racist intent of work requirements for Medicaid should be apparent. Let's make healthcare a right for everyone," wrote Chuck Idelson of National Nurses United.
In his twin rulings, Judge James E. Boasberg found that the Trump administration failed to adequately consider the coverage losses that would result from imposing work requirements on Medicaid recipients.
Jane Perkins, legal director of the National Health Law Program, said it is "nonsensical and illegal to add obstacles to Medicaid for large groups of individuals who are already working, or full-time healthcare providers for family members, or suffering chronic health matters."
"Work should not be a key to healthcare access," Perkins added.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) tweeted: "All along this was a scheme to take away people's healthcare, nothing more."
The judge's ruling comes as reports of the devastating consequences of Medicaid work requirements continue to emerge.
In Arkansas alone, more than 18,000 people lost Medicaid coverage in 2018 due to the state's new work requirements.
"This cruel, stupid, vindictive idea is working out just as awfully as you would imagine," Splinter's Hamilton Nolan wrote Wednesday.
Undeterred by court rulings, the Trump administration is continuing to "aggressively" push work requirements in several other states, including New Hampshire, noted Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein.
"If the Trump administration really believed in healthcare," tweeted advocacy group Protect Our Care, "they would learn their lesson and abandon their war on the healthcare of millions of Americans."