Mar 21, 2019
Free speech and digital rights advocates across Europe blacked out websites on Thursday to protest the controversial Copyright Directive the European Parliament is scheduled to vote on next Tuesday.
Activists are also planning #SaveYourInternet protests, which are set to take place across Europe on Saturday.
For the past few years, members of the European Union's (EU) legislative assembly have negotiated updates to continent-wide copyright rules that are nearly two decades old. Digital experts and activists warn that two particular provisions in the final text of the directive (pdf) collectively would be a "catastrophe for free expression."
"Although there are important wins for the open community in the current text, the inclusion of Articles 11 and 13 will harm the way people find and share information online," the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes free knowledge, said in a policy statement.
(Note: As part of the legislative process, Article 13 has been renumbered as Article 17.)
Detailing the controversial sections, the Wikimedia Foundation explained:
Article 11 would allow news publishers to sell licenses for even the smallest snippets taken from online news sites. If no license fee is paid, the snippets would need to be removed from the search results and news aggregation lists. By imposing these burdens on websites that collect, organize, and make sense of the news, Article 11 will make it even harder to sort through the noise to find high-quality news sources for projects like Wikipedia.
Article 13 [a.k.a. Article 17] creates new liability for websites that host user-generated content, if they are unable to ensure that infringing works are not re-uploaded to their sites. This would mean that all uploads to platforms would have to be scanned and treated as presumptively suspicious. Although non-commercial encyclopedias like Wikipedia are exempted, the greater internet ecosystem our communities rely upon will suffer if platforms are forced to privately enforce copyright.
Activists and website administrators across Europe joined #Blackout21 on Thursday to protest the pair of provisions, which critics often call the "link tax" and "censorship machine," respectively. Organizers circulated various images for social media profiles and websites:
\u201cUse these images for your stories on @instagram and @WhatsApp to notify your followers about #SaveYourInternet protests! #Blackout21 @FixIt_EU @uploadfilter #InstagramStory\u201d— Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab (@Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab) 1553127664
\u201cOfficial #SaveTheInternet #Blackout21 Scripts are online now! If you run a website and want to join the protest against #Article13 on 21st of March, display a blackout page by embedding this script tomorrow: https://t.co/Km6auiQ3uc\u201d— Chris // NullDev (@Chris // NullDev) 1553102417
Blackout participants included the German, Czech, Slovak, and Danish Wikipedias as well as Pornhub:
\u201cMidnight special! Not your average @edri tweet, but definitely worth mentioning. @pornhub is supporting #SaveYourInternet ! #Blackout21 #Pledge2019\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1553122825
Find a map of the weekend demonstrations with links to the Facebook events here.
\u201c*UPDATE PROTEST OVERVIEW*\nThe Europe-wide demos at a glance. Twitter, please do your thing and spread the word! PS: A magnifying glass is (still) recommended \ud83e\uddd0\nMap: https://t.co/GiPhthC1hG\n#SaveYourInternet #EU2303 #Uploadfilter #StopArt13\u201d— Savetheinternet.io (@Savetheinternet.io) 1553093959
Open internet advocates continue to encourage Europeans to keep pressure on their Members of Parliament (MEPs) ahead of the final vote. A website managed by European Digital Rights (EDRi) and backed by several other groups has created a tool to help people identify and contact MEPs from each country.
Next week, MEPs "will get to choose between supporting a reform that forces upload filters onto the internet OR to reject the reform and demand a balanced revision of the text for the benefit of citizens and creators," the site explains. If the directive passes, "the next step is then the final approval of the Council at the Ministerial level. There is no date yet for this vote but it can be expected to take place in April."
In other words, as the Wikimedia Foundation concluded it its statement, "this is the last chance for Europeans who care about access to knowledge and the sharing of diverse information on the internet to make their voice heard."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Free speech and digital rights advocates across Europe blacked out websites on Thursday to protest the controversial Copyright Directive the European Parliament is scheduled to vote on next Tuesday.
Activists are also planning #SaveYourInternet protests, which are set to take place across Europe on Saturday.
For the past few years, members of the European Union's (EU) legislative assembly have negotiated updates to continent-wide copyright rules that are nearly two decades old. Digital experts and activists warn that two particular provisions in the final text of the directive (pdf) collectively would be a "catastrophe for free expression."
"Although there are important wins for the open community in the current text, the inclusion of Articles 11 and 13 will harm the way people find and share information online," the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes free knowledge, said in a policy statement.
(Note: As part of the legislative process, Article 13 has been renumbered as Article 17.)
Detailing the controversial sections, the Wikimedia Foundation explained:
Article 11 would allow news publishers to sell licenses for even the smallest snippets taken from online news sites. If no license fee is paid, the snippets would need to be removed from the search results and news aggregation lists. By imposing these burdens on websites that collect, organize, and make sense of the news, Article 11 will make it even harder to sort through the noise to find high-quality news sources for projects like Wikipedia.
Article 13 [a.k.a. Article 17] creates new liability for websites that host user-generated content, if they are unable to ensure that infringing works are not re-uploaded to their sites. This would mean that all uploads to platforms would have to be scanned and treated as presumptively suspicious. Although non-commercial encyclopedias like Wikipedia are exempted, the greater internet ecosystem our communities rely upon will suffer if platforms are forced to privately enforce copyright.
Activists and website administrators across Europe joined #Blackout21 on Thursday to protest the pair of provisions, which critics often call the "link tax" and "censorship machine," respectively. Organizers circulated various images for social media profiles and websites:
\u201cUse these images for your stories on @instagram and @WhatsApp to notify your followers about #SaveYourInternet protests! #Blackout21 @FixIt_EU @uploadfilter #InstagramStory\u201d— Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab (@Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab) 1553127664
\u201cOfficial #SaveTheInternet #Blackout21 Scripts are online now! If you run a website and want to join the protest against #Article13 on 21st of March, display a blackout page by embedding this script tomorrow: https://t.co/Km6auiQ3uc\u201d— Chris // NullDev (@Chris // NullDev) 1553102417
Blackout participants included the German, Czech, Slovak, and Danish Wikipedias as well as Pornhub:
\u201cMidnight special! Not your average @edri tweet, but definitely worth mentioning. @pornhub is supporting #SaveYourInternet ! #Blackout21 #Pledge2019\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1553122825
Find a map of the weekend demonstrations with links to the Facebook events here.
\u201c*UPDATE PROTEST OVERVIEW*\nThe Europe-wide demos at a glance. Twitter, please do your thing and spread the word! PS: A magnifying glass is (still) recommended \ud83e\uddd0\nMap: https://t.co/GiPhthC1hG\n#SaveYourInternet #EU2303 #Uploadfilter #StopArt13\u201d— Savetheinternet.io (@Savetheinternet.io) 1553093959
Open internet advocates continue to encourage Europeans to keep pressure on their Members of Parliament (MEPs) ahead of the final vote. A website managed by European Digital Rights (EDRi) and backed by several other groups has created a tool to help people identify and contact MEPs from each country.
Next week, MEPs "will get to choose between supporting a reform that forces upload filters onto the internet OR to reject the reform and demand a balanced revision of the text for the benefit of citizens and creators," the site explains. If the directive passes, "the next step is then the final approval of the Council at the Ministerial level. There is no date yet for this vote but it can be expected to take place in April."
In other words, as the Wikimedia Foundation concluded it its statement, "this is the last chance for Europeans who care about access to knowledge and the sharing of diverse information on the internet to make their voice heard."
Free speech and digital rights advocates across Europe blacked out websites on Thursday to protest the controversial Copyright Directive the European Parliament is scheduled to vote on next Tuesday.
Activists are also planning #SaveYourInternet protests, which are set to take place across Europe on Saturday.
For the past few years, members of the European Union's (EU) legislative assembly have negotiated updates to continent-wide copyright rules that are nearly two decades old. Digital experts and activists warn that two particular provisions in the final text of the directive (pdf) collectively would be a "catastrophe for free expression."
"Although there are important wins for the open community in the current text, the inclusion of Articles 11 and 13 will harm the way people find and share information online," the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes free knowledge, said in a policy statement.
(Note: As part of the legislative process, Article 13 has been renumbered as Article 17.)
Detailing the controversial sections, the Wikimedia Foundation explained:
Article 11 would allow news publishers to sell licenses for even the smallest snippets taken from online news sites. If no license fee is paid, the snippets would need to be removed from the search results and news aggregation lists. By imposing these burdens on websites that collect, organize, and make sense of the news, Article 11 will make it even harder to sort through the noise to find high-quality news sources for projects like Wikipedia.
Article 13 [a.k.a. Article 17] creates new liability for websites that host user-generated content, if they are unable to ensure that infringing works are not re-uploaded to their sites. This would mean that all uploads to platforms would have to be scanned and treated as presumptively suspicious. Although non-commercial encyclopedias like Wikipedia are exempted, the greater internet ecosystem our communities rely upon will suffer if platforms are forced to privately enforce copyright.
Activists and website administrators across Europe joined #Blackout21 on Thursday to protest the pair of provisions, which critics often call the "link tax" and "censorship machine," respectively. Organizers circulated various images for social media profiles and websites:
\u201cUse these images for your stories on @instagram and @WhatsApp to notify your followers about #SaveYourInternet protests! #Blackout21 @FixIt_EU @uploadfilter #InstagramStory\u201d— Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab (@Blackout21 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa\u26ab) 1553127664
\u201cOfficial #SaveTheInternet #Blackout21 Scripts are online now! If you run a website and want to join the protest against #Article13 on 21st of March, display a blackout page by embedding this script tomorrow: https://t.co/Km6auiQ3uc\u201d— Chris // NullDev (@Chris // NullDev) 1553102417
Blackout participants included the German, Czech, Slovak, and Danish Wikipedias as well as Pornhub:
\u201cMidnight special! Not your average @edri tweet, but definitely worth mentioning. @pornhub is supporting #SaveYourInternet ! #Blackout21 #Pledge2019\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1553122825
Find a map of the weekend demonstrations with links to the Facebook events here.
\u201c*UPDATE PROTEST OVERVIEW*\nThe Europe-wide demos at a glance. Twitter, please do your thing and spread the word! PS: A magnifying glass is (still) recommended \ud83e\uddd0\nMap: https://t.co/GiPhthC1hG\n#SaveYourInternet #EU2303 #Uploadfilter #StopArt13\u201d— Savetheinternet.io (@Savetheinternet.io) 1553093959
Open internet advocates continue to encourage Europeans to keep pressure on their Members of Parliament (MEPs) ahead of the final vote. A website managed by European Digital Rights (EDRi) and backed by several other groups has created a tool to help people identify and contact MEPs from each country.
Next week, MEPs "will get to choose between supporting a reform that forces upload filters onto the internet OR to reject the reform and demand a balanced revision of the text for the benefit of citizens and creators," the site explains. If the directive passes, "the next step is then the final approval of the Council at the Ministerial level. There is no date yet for this vote but it can be expected to take place in April."
In other words, as the Wikimedia Foundation concluded it its statement, "this is the last chance for Europeans who care about access to knowledge and the sharing of diverse information on the internet to make their voice heard."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.