Jan 29, 2019
In the first publicly known instance of the Trump administration implementing its new policy that forces some asylum seekers to await their U.S. immigration court hearings in Mexico, 55-year-old Carlos Gomez Perdomo of Honduras was sent to the United States' southern neighbor on Tuesday--sparking a fresh wave of condemnation.
Critics of the policy point out that it could further endanger asylum seekers. As Melissa Crow of the Southern Poverty Law Center toldAgence France-Presse: "It's not safe for many, if not most, of these asylum seekers to wait in Mexico. Lots of them are fleeing cartel violence and domestic abusers."
\u201c"Remain in Mexico" is the latest brick in the administration's policy wall. \n\nThe Trump Administration is doing everything in its power to block men, women, and children from seeking their legal right to asylum.\u201d— Human Rights First (@Human Rights First) 1548807660
"There are examples of people being pursued by their persecutors while waiting in Mexico," Crow noted. "It's a horribly bad idea to implement this plan."
\u201cThe Trump administration\u2019s latest policy requiring asylum seekers who have already fled violence and corruption to wait in Tijuana \u2013 where the homicide rate is \u201csky high\u201d \u2013 misses the whole point of asylum.\n\n"It's not about the dollar, it's about safety.\u201d https://t.co/9hRv6pXNdL\u201d— Southern Poverty Law Center (@Southern Poverty Law Center) 1548788418
"We have worked with people who are under active threat here in Mexico, who have had to move between shelters and stay in secret locations because they are being actively pursued throughout Mexico, and throughout Tijuana," Nicole Ramos, an attorney with the Tijuana-based legal aid office Al Otro Lado told the Washington Post. "This is literally sentencing people to die."
President Donald Trump's administration, however, has ignored such warnings and forged ahead with what New York Immigration Coalition executive director Steven Choi described as just another part of a "systematic, deliberate effort to undermine the safety of thousands of asylum seekers and dismantle our refugee system."
Using the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's name for the plan--initially called the "Remain in Mexico" policy--the U.S. embassy in Mexico City confirmed in a statement that "the United States has begun implementing the Migrant Protection Protocols."
As immigrant rights advocates challenge the legality of the policy, some have said that calling it the "Illegal Return of Asylum Seekers Scheme" would be more accurate.
\u201cTime to accurately name this policy. How about the "Illegal Return of Asylum Seekers Scheme." The "Remain in Mexico" label was misleading, but the re-branding as "Migrant Protection Protocols" for a plan to deny protections to asylum seekers is totally & perversely deceptive.\u201d— Eleanor Acer (@Eleanor Acer) 1548453710
The asylum "waiting" policy, announced last month, comes from an administration that has also forcibly separated thousands of migrant children from their parents, prompted the longest ever government shutdown in pursuit of billions of dollars in funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and threatened to declare a national emergency to build the wall.
\u201cU.S. policies at the border must not punish asylum-seekers and migrants for seeking protection. Any policy that does this is in violation of both U.S. and international human rights law.\n\nTell your Senator to say NO to President Trump\u2019s border wall 1-844-305-9050\u201d— Amnesty International USA (@Amnesty International USA) 1548791103
As the Trump administration continues to enact racist policies aimed at detering asylum seekers from entering the United States, Gomez Perdomo, who traveled as part of a caravan from Honduras that arrived in November, told the Post he was shocked to be sent back to Mexico.
"I said to myself, 'I don't know what's happening, and I don't know what will happen in this case,'" he said. "After I have spent so much time battling, all the time I've spent outside my country, to come to this place with a goal and to lose. I have not advanced at all. Instead I seem to have gone backward."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.