Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai speaks at the Las Vegas Convention Center on April 10, 2018. (Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Dec 03, 2018
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
\u201cWhat is the @FCC hiding? When two reporters ask questions about serious fraud and evidence of Russian intervention in the @FCC #NetNeutrality record the agency refuses to provide answers. This is not right. Something is very wrong. @nickconfessore @jsvine https://t.co/0XokgOUybH\u201d— Jessica Rosenworcel (@Jessica Rosenworcel) 1543861513
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
\u201cWhat is the @FCC hiding? When two reporters ask questions about serious fraud and evidence of Russian intervention in the @FCC #NetNeutrality record the agency refuses to provide answers. This is not right. Something is very wrong. @nickconfessore @jsvine https://t.co/0XokgOUybH\u201d— Jessica Rosenworcel (@Jessica Rosenworcel) 1543861513
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
\u201cWhat is the @FCC hiding? When two reporters ask questions about serious fraud and evidence of Russian intervention in the @FCC #NetNeutrality record the agency refuses to provide answers. This is not right. Something is very wrong. @nickconfessore @jsvine https://t.co/0XokgOUybH\u201d— Jessica Rosenworcel (@Jessica Rosenworcel) 1543861513
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.