Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai speaks at the Las Vegas Convention Center on April 10, 2018. (Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
'What Is the FCC Hiding?' As Net Neutrality Deadline Looms, Agency Refuses FOIA Requests for Crucial Records
"Something here is rotten—and it's time for the FCC to come clean. Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."
Just days before the Dec. 10 deadline for the House to pass a resolution to restore net neutrality protections, the Republican-controlled FCC on Monday rejected Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the New York Times and Buzzfeed for server logs and other records pertaining to the millions of fake comments that flooded the agency's system as it moved to repeal net neutrality last year.
"What is the FCC hiding?" asked Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, the only member of the agency to dissent from the FCC's decision to reject the FOIA requests.
"Something here is rotten--and it's time for the FCC to come clean," Rosenworcel, currently the lone Democrat on the FCC, wrote in her dissent (pdf) against the agency's decision on Monday. "Regrettably, this agency will not do this on its own. So it falls to those who seek to investigate from outside its walls."
By denying records requests from the Times and Buzzfeed, Rosenworcel argued that the FCC--headed by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai--appears to be "trying to prevent anyone from looking too closely at the mess it made of net neutrality. It is hiding what it knows about the fraud in our record and it is preventing an honest account of its many problems from seeing the light of day."
A spokesperson for the Times told Gizmodo that the paper is planning to challenge the FCC's decision in court.
The FCC's refusal to make its server logs and net neutrality comment records public comes as open internet advocates are urgently mobilizing and pressuring holdout lawmakers to sign on to a House Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, which would restore open internet protections the GOP-controlled agency voted to repeal last year despite massive public opposition.
With the deadline less than a week away, the House CRA still needs 41 more signatures to pass.
"Net neutrality is not dead yet. Not even close," declared Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future (FFTF). "But as the clock runs out for this Congress to act, we have an opportunity to show the entire world which elected officials are willing to fight for net neutrality, and which ones decide to sit on their hands and let big telecom companies take control over what we can see and do on the internet."