SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Urgenda campaign celebrated a Dutch appeals court ruling on Tuesday that the government must do more to cut greenhouse gas emissions. (Photo: @urgenda/Twitter)
'One for the History Books!': Dutch Court Puts World on Notice by Ordering Government to Move Faster on Emission Cuts
The government of the Netherlands, said the court, "has done too little to prevent the dangers of climate change and is doing too little to catch up."
Oct 09, 2018
Citing the urgent warnings issued by the global scientific community about the pending climate catastrophe while also putting governments across the world "on notice," a Dutch appeals court on Tuesday upheld a landmark legal ruling that requires the Netherlands government to be significantly more aggressive in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
"The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
--Marjan Minnesma, Urgenda campaign
With a ruling that "was greeted with whoops and cheers in the courtroom," the Guardian reports that the court called for emissions "reductions of at least 25 percent by 2020--measured against 1990 levels--higher than the 17 percent drop planned by Mark Rutte's liberal administration."
"The government has done too little to prevent the dangers of climate change and is doing too little to catch up," the court said Tuesday, according to the German news website Deutsche Welle.
"There is a clear chance that the reduction will fall far short of the 25 percent goal, which is unacceptable," the ruling continued. "The state is acting unlawfully and in violation of the duty of care."
Responding to the ruling in a statement to the Guardian, Marjan Minnesma, director of the Urgenda campaign, which brought the case, referenced the report released Monday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the U.N.'s leading body for climate science.
"The special report of the IPCC emphasizes that we need to reduce emissions with much greater urgency. The Dutch government knows that as a low-lying country, we are on the front line of climate change. Our own government agencies recently concluded that in the worst case scenario sea levels might rise by 2.5 to 3 meters (8.2 to 9.8 feet) by the end of the century," she said. "The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
"Who's next? #Shell should be quaking in their boots."
-- Friends of the Earth Europe
Dennis van Berkel, the legal counsel for Urgenda, added that the move "has consequences for all governments. They should look at this closely and realize that they are not acting in the interests of their own people. By delaying [climate] actions and not increasing them to the highest possible level--they are violating the rights of their people."
Climate campaigners with Friends of the Earth Europe and Milieudefensie, the group's Dutch branch, celebrated the decision as "one for the history books!"
Environmental groups are now setting their sights on Royal Dutch Shell, the oil and gas giant whose in-house scientists warned the company in the 1980s that fossil fuels threaten the planet, according to reporting by a Dutch journalist published earlier this year.
Milieudefensie has filed suit against Shell to force the multinational company to bring its policies into compliance with the goals of the Paris agreement. Dutch citizens can join the case as co-plaintiffs. Others can support the case by signing a petition circulated by Friends of the Earth International.
Congratulating Urgenda--the group that brought the emissions case--on Twitter, Greenpeace concluded, "Your victory should inspire people around the world to hold their governments legally accountable for climate change."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Citing the urgent warnings issued by the global scientific community about the pending climate catastrophe while also putting governments across the world "on notice," a Dutch appeals court on Tuesday upheld a landmark legal ruling that requires the Netherlands government to be significantly more aggressive in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
"The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
--Marjan Minnesma, Urgenda campaign
With a ruling that "was greeted with whoops and cheers in the courtroom," the Guardian reports that the court called for emissions "reductions of at least 25 percent by 2020--measured against 1990 levels--higher than the 17 percent drop planned by Mark Rutte's liberal administration."
"The government has done too little to prevent the dangers of climate change and is doing too little to catch up," the court said Tuesday, according to the German news website Deutsche Welle.
"There is a clear chance that the reduction will fall far short of the 25 percent goal, which is unacceptable," the ruling continued. "The state is acting unlawfully and in violation of the duty of care."
Responding to the ruling in a statement to the Guardian, Marjan Minnesma, director of the Urgenda campaign, which brought the case, referenced the report released Monday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the U.N.'s leading body for climate science.
"The special report of the IPCC emphasizes that we need to reduce emissions with much greater urgency. The Dutch government knows that as a low-lying country, we are on the front line of climate change. Our own government agencies recently concluded that in the worst case scenario sea levels might rise by 2.5 to 3 meters (8.2 to 9.8 feet) by the end of the century," she said. "The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
"Who's next? #Shell should be quaking in their boots."
-- Friends of the Earth Europe
Dennis van Berkel, the legal counsel for Urgenda, added that the move "has consequences for all governments. They should look at this closely and realize that they are not acting in the interests of their own people. By delaying [climate] actions and not increasing them to the highest possible level--they are violating the rights of their people."
Climate campaigners with Friends of the Earth Europe and Milieudefensie, the group's Dutch branch, celebrated the decision as "one for the history books!"
Environmental groups are now setting their sights on Royal Dutch Shell, the oil and gas giant whose in-house scientists warned the company in the 1980s that fossil fuels threaten the planet, according to reporting by a Dutch journalist published earlier this year.
Milieudefensie has filed suit against Shell to force the multinational company to bring its policies into compliance with the goals of the Paris agreement. Dutch citizens can join the case as co-plaintiffs. Others can support the case by signing a petition circulated by Friends of the Earth International.
Congratulating Urgenda--the group that brought the emissions case--on Twitter, Greenpeace concluded, "Your victory should inspire people around the world to hold their governments legally accountable for climate change."
Citing the urgent warnings issued by the global scientific community about the pending climate catastrophe while also putting governments across the world "on notice," a Dutch appeals court on Tuesday upheld a landmark legal ruling that requires the Netherlands government to be significantly more aggressive in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
"The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
--Marjan Minnesma, Urgenda campaign
With a ruling that "was greeted with whoops and cheers in the courtroom," the Guardian reports that the court called for emissions "reductions of at least 25 percent by 2020--measured against 1990 levels--higher than the 17 percent drop planned by Mark Rutte's liberal administration."
"The government has done too little to prevent the dangers of climate change and is doing too little to catch up," the court said Tuesday, according to the German news website Deutsche Welle.
"There is a clear chance that the reduction will fall far short of the 25 percent goal, which is unacceptable," the ruling continued. "The state is acting unlawfully and in violation of the duty of care."
Responding to the ruling in a statement to the Guardian, Marjan Minnesma, director of the Urgenda campaign, which brought the case, referenced the report released Monday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the U.N.'s leading body for climate science.
"The special report of the IPCC emphasizes that we need to reduce emissions with much greater urgency. The Dutch government knows that as a low-lying country, we are on the front line of climate change. Our own government agencies recently concluded that in the worst case scenario sea levels might rise by 2.5 to 3 meters (8.2 to 9.8 feet) by the end of the century," she said. "The court of appeal's decision puts all governments on notice. They must act now, or they will be held to account."
"Who's next? #Shell should be quaking in their boots."
-- Friends of the Earth Europe
Dennis van Berkel, the legal counsel for Urgenda, added that the move "has consequences for all governments. They should look at this closely and realize that they are not acting in the interests of their own people. By delaying [climate] actions and not increasing them to the highest possible level--they are violating the rights of their people."
Climate campaigners with Friends of the Earth Europe and Milieudefensie, the group's Dutch branch, celebrated the decision as "one for the history books!"
Environmental groups are now setting their sights on Royal Dutch Shell, the oil and gas giant whose in-house scientists warned the company in the 1980s that fossil fuels threaten the planet, according to reporting by a Dutch journalist published earlier this year.
Milieudefensie has filed suit against Shell to force the multinational company to bring its policies into compliance with the goals of the Paris agreement. Dutch citizens can join the case as co-plaintiffs. Others can support the case by signing a petition circulated by Friends of the Earth International.
Congratulating Urgenda--the group that brought the emissions case--on Twitter, Greenpeace concluded, "Your victory should inspire people around the world to hold their governments legally accountable for climate change."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.