Sep 04, 2018
"An all-out assault on the rule of law" is how one former high-ranking Justice Department official described President Donald Trump's latest attack on the department in which he blasted Attorney General Jeff Sessions over the criminal indictments of two politically-loyal Republican congressmen.
Appearing to express dismay on Monday at the investigations which brought about charges against two of his most loyal supporters in Congress, Reps. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Chris Collins (R-N.Y.), Trump suggested that allowing Hunter and Collins to run for their Republican seats in the upcoming midterm elections without informing the public of the charges would be preferable to following the rule of law, and sarcastically slammed Sessions for potentially harming the GOP's control over Congress.
\u201cTwo long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1535999125
\u201cThe president is now arguing that the Justice Department should make its justice decisions based on what\u2019s best for the Republican Party.\u201d— Daniel Dale (@Daniel Dale) 1535999496
The president's statement was denounced as "shameless" by former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, who previously stood up to Trump by refusing to enforce his Muslim ban, while former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara called it clear proof of Trump's "contempt for the rule of law."
\u201cRepeatedly trying to pervert DOJ into a weapon to go after his adversaries, and now shamelessly complaining that DOJ should protect his political allies to maintain his majority in the midterms, is nothing short of an all out assault on the rule of law.\u201d— Sally Yates (@Sally Yates) 1536014898
\u201cI still can\u2019t get over this tweet. It\u2019s the most outrageous and damning proof of Trump\u2019s utter contempt for the rule of law to come directly out of his mouth. It\u2019s also full of basic and provable lies. It will be Exhibit A in his undoing.\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1536037464
Trump's complaint came weeks after Collins, the first member of Congress to endorse his presidential run in 2015, was indicted on charges of insider trading. Hunter, also an early and vocal supporter of the president, was accused of misusing $250,000 of campaign funds in late August.
Collins suspended his bid for re-election after his indictment, while Hunter has indicated he has no plans to end his run. The latest internal poll taken after Hunter's charges were announced found that he was tied with his progressive Democratic opponent, Ammar Campa-Najjar, contrasting with earlier surveys in which Hunter was ahead by eight points.
Contrary to Trump's claim that both indictments were the result of "long-running Obama-era investigations," the DOJ did not open its investigation into Hunter until March 2017, after Trump took office. The Collins probe began in July 2017.
Trump's attacks on the DOJ and Sessions provide the latest evidence that the president believes the attorney general's job is to protect him and his political allies while targeting his opponents. Last month Trump directed Sessions to "look into all of the corruption on the 'other side'."
Journalist John Nichols pointed out that Trump's flagrant attempt to use his authority to favor his own political party in an upcoming election by directing federal prosecutors to ignore two congressmen's allegations of criminal conduct, amounts to the definition of an impeachable offense.
\u201cUsing the authority & prestige of the presidency to suborn politicization of investigations & prosecutions involving your allies?\n\nYes, this is a definitionally impeachable offense.\n\nIn fact, it is the most precise & pressing argument for the rapid #impeachment of Donald Trump.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1536063821
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
election 2018impeachmentjeff sessionsjohn nicholsrepublican partytrumpismus congressus department of justice
"An all-out assault on the rule of law" is how one former high-ranking Justice Department official described President Donald Trump's latest attack on the department in which he blasted Attorney General Jeff Sessions over the criminal indictments of two politically-loyal Republican congressmen.
Appearing to express dismay on Monday at the investigations which brought about charges against two of his most loyal supporters in Congress, Reps. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Chris Collins (R-N.Y.), Trump suggested that allowing Hunter and Collins to run for their Republican seats in the upcoming midterm elections without informing the public of the charges would be preferable to following the rule of law, and sarcastically slammed Sessions for potentially harming the GOP's control over Congress.
\u201cTwo long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1535999125
\u201cThe president is now arguing that the Justice Department should make its justice decisions based on what\u2019s best for the Republican Party.\u201d— Daniel Dale (@Daniel Dale) 1535999496
The president's statement was denounced as "shameless" by former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, who previously stood up to Trump by refusing to enforce his Muslim ban, while former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara called it clear proof of Trump's "contempt for the rule of law."
\u201cRepeatedly trying to pervert DOJ into a weapon to go after his adversaries, and now shamelessly complaining that DOJ should protect his political allies to maintain his majority in the midterms, is nothing short of an all out assault on the rule of law.\u201d— Sally Yates (@Sally Yates) 1536014898
\u201cI still can\u2019t get over this tweet. It\u2019s the most outrageous and damning proof of Trump\u2019s utter contempt for the rule of law to come directly out of his mouth. It\u2019s also full of basic and provable lies. It will be Exhibit A in his undoing.\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1536037464
Trump's complaint came weeks after Collins, the first member of Congress to endorse his presidential run in 2015, was indicted on charges of insider trading. Hunter, also an early and vocal supporter of the president, was accused of misusing $250,000 of campaign funds in late August.
Collins suspended his bid for re-election after his indictment, while Hunter has indicated he has no plans to end his run. The latest internal poll taken after Hunter's charges were announced found that he was tied with his progressive Democratic opponent, Ammar Campa-Najjar, contrasting with earlier surveys in which Hunter was ahead by eight points.
Contrary to Trump's claim that both indictments were the result of "long-running Obama-era investigations," the DOJ did not open its investigation into Hunter until March 2017, after Trump took office. The Collins probe began in July 2017.
Trump's attacks on the DOJ and Sessions provide the latest evidence that the president believes the attorney general's job is to protect him and his political allies while targeting his opponents. Last month Trump directed Sessions to "look into all of the corruption on the 'other side'."
Journalist John Nichols pointed out that Trump's flagrant attempt to use his authority to favor his own political party in an upcoming election by directing federal prosecutors to ignore two congressmen's allegations of criminal conduct, amounts to the definition of an impeachable offense.
\u201cUsing the authority & prestige of the presidency to suborn politicization of investigations & prosecutions involving your allies?\n\nYes, this is a definitionally impeachable offense.\n\nIn fact, it is the most precise & pressing argument for the rapid #impeachment of Donald Trump.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1536063821
"An all-out assault on the rule of law" is how one former high-ranking Justice Department official described President Donald Trump's latest attack on the department in which he blasted Attorney General Jeff Sessions over the criminal indictments of two politically-loyal Republican congressmen.
Appearing to express dismay on Monday at the investigations which brought about charges against two of his most loyal supporters in Congress, Reps. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Chris Collins (R-N.Y.), Trump suggested that allowing Hunter and Collins to run for their Republican seats in the upcoming midterm elections without informing the public of the charges would be preferable to following the rule of law, and sarcastically slammed Sessions for potentially harming the GOP's control over Congress.
\u201cTwo long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1535999125
\u201cThe president is now arguing that the Justice Department should make its justice decisions based on what\u2019s best for the Republican Party.\u201d— Daniel Dale (@Daniel Dale) 1535999496
The president's statement was denounced as "shameless" by former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, who previously stood up to Trump by refusing to enforce his Muslim ban, while former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara called it clear proof of Trump's "contempt for the rule of law."
\u201cRepeatedly trying to pervert DOJ into a weapon to go after his adversaries, and now shamelessly complaining that DOJ should protect his political allies to maintain his majority in the midterms, is nothing short of an all out assault on the rule of law.\u201d— Sally Yates (@Sally Yates) 1536014898
\u201cI still can\u2019t get over this tweet. It\u2019s the most outrageous and damning proof of Trump\u2019s utter contempt for the rule of law to come directly out of his mouth. It\u2019s also full of basic and provable lies. It will be Exhibit A in his undoing.\u201d— Preet Bharara (@Preet Bharara) 1536037464
Trump's complaint came weeks after Collins, the first member of Congress to endorse his presidential run in 2015, was indicted on charges of insider trading. Hunter, also an early and vocal supporter of the president, was accused of misusing $250,000 of campaign funds in late August.
Collins suspended his bid for re-election after his indictment, while Hunter has indicated he has no plans to end his run. The latest internal poll taken after Hunter's charges were announced found that he was tied with his progressive Democratic opponent, Ammar Campa-Najjar, contrasting with earlier surveys in which Hunter was ahead by eight points.
Contrary to Trump's claim that both indictments were the result of "long-running Obama-era investigations," the DOJ did not open its investigation into Hunter until March 2017, after Trump took office. The Collins probe began in July 2017.
Trump's attacks on the DOJ and Sessions provide the latest evidence that the president believes the attorney general's job is to protect him and his political allies while targeting his opponents. Last month Trump directed Sessions to "look into all of the corruption on the 'other side'."
Journalist John Nichols pointed out that Trump's flagrant attempt to use his authority to favor his own political party in an upcoming election by directing federal prosecutors to ignore two congressmen's allegations of criminal conduct, amounts to the definition of an impeachable offense.
\u201cUsing the authority & prestige of the presidency to suborn politicization of investigations & prosecutions involving your allies?\n\nYes, this is a definitionally impeachable offense.\n\nIn fact, it is the most precise & pressing argument for the rapid #impeachment of Donald Trump.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1536063821
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.