SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump expressed his desire for a military parade in the U.S. after attending France's annual event on Bastile Day last year with French President Emmanuel Macron. (Photo: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff/Flickr/cc)
Trump Rant About Canceled Military Parade Panned as Product From 'Diseased Mind of a Shrieking Dimwit'
Chorus of ridicule follows president's bizarre excuses and declaration that funds will now be used to "buy some more fighter jets!"
Aug 17, 2018
After postponing his coveted military parade--an event which 75 percent of respondents in a poll earlier this year said was not a good use of government funds--President Donald Trump shared with his Twitter followers on Friday that he'll find another use for the money that would have paid for the parade: adding to the military's already-massive collection of weapons.
"Now we can buy some more jet fighters!" Trump declared.
On Thursday, the Pentagon announced that the parade would not move forward this year, after estimates for the events cost jumped more than 600 percent from previous proposals. Officials told the Associated Press that the parade was expected to cost $92 million, up from the initial estimate of $12 million.
Trump quickly blamed the local government in Washington, D.C. for estimating the exorbitant cost--an accusation Mayor Muriel Bowser readily accepted.
Other critics derided Trump's plan to travel to Paris in order to see France's military parade once again, now that his own plans had fallen through.
Others condemned the president's knee-jerk push for "more jet fighters" by pointing out much more worthwhile and pressing needs those funds could be used for:
In fact, several noted, the $92 million the parade would have cost would not even buy a single fighter jet.
It could, however, pay for clean water in Flint, Michigan, where water pipes are not scheduled to be replaced until 2020--with tens of millions of dollars left over.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After postponing his coveted military parade--an event which 75 percent of respondents in a poll earlier this year said was not a good use of government funds--President Donald Trump shared with his Twitter followers on Friday that he'll find another use for the money that would have paid for the parade: adding to the military's already-massive collection of weapons.
"Now we can buy some more jet fighters!" Trump declared.
On Thursday, the Pentagon announced that the parade would not move forward this year, after estimates for the events cost jumped more than 600 percent from previous proposals. Officials told the Associated Press that the parade was expected to cost $92 million, up from the initial estimate of $12 million.
Trump quickly blamed the local government in Washington, D.C. for estimating the exorbitant cost--an accusation Mayor Muriel Bowser readily accepted.
Other critics derided Trump's plan to travel to Paris in order to see France's military parade once again, now that his own plans had fallen through.
Others condemned the president's knee-jerk push for "more jet fighters" by pointing out much more worthwhile and pressing needs those funds could be used for:
In fact, several noted, the $92 million the parade would have cost would not even buy a single fighter jet.
It could, however, pay for clean water in Flint, Michigan, where water pipes are not scheduled to be replaced until 2020--with tens of millions of dollars left over.
After postponing his coveted military parade--an event which 75 percent of respondents in a poll earlier this year said was not a good use of government funds--President Donald Trump shared with his Twitter followers on Friday that he'll find another use for the money that would have paid for the parade: adding to the military's already-massive collection of weapons.
"Now we can buy some more jet fighters!" Trump declared.
On Thursday, the Pentagon announced that the parade would not move forward this year, after estimates for the events cost jumped more than 600 percent from previous proposals. Officials told the Associated Press that the parade was expected to cost $92 million, up from the initial estimate of $12 million.
Trump quickly blamed the local government in Washington, D.C. for estimating the exorbitant cost--an accusation Mayor Muriel Bowser readily accepted.
Other critics derided Trump's plan to travel to Paris in order to see France's military parade once again, now that his own plans had fallen through.
Others condemned the president's knee-jerk push for "more jet fighters" by pointing out much more worthwhile and pressing needs those funds could be used for:
In fact, several noted, the $92 million the parade would have cost would not even buy a single fighter jet.
It could, however, pay for clean water in Flint, Michigan, where water pipes are not scheduled to be replaced until 2020--with tens of millions of dollars left over.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.