
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke blamed so-called "radical environmentalists" for wildfires like the one that recently became the largest in California's history. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke blamed so-called "radical environmentalists" for wildfires like the one that recently became the largest in California's history. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
Instead of addressing the root causes that scientists and experts say are fueling some of the unprecedented wildfires now ravaging communities in California and other western states, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is himself under fire on Wednesday after penning an op-ed that critics argue shows the top Trump official exploiting the ongoing infernos as a way to push the business interests of logging companies and other extractive industries.
"Radical environmentalists," he argued on USA Today's opinion page, are to blame for blazes like the Mendocino Complex Fire, which became the largest in the state's history this week, due to their calls to protect federal lands and national monuments instead of opening them up to loggers, ranchers, and the fossil fuel industry.
"Every year we watch our forests burn, and every year there is a call for action," Zinke wrote. "Yet, when action comes, and we try to thin forests of dead and dying timber, or we try to sustainably harvest timber from dense and fire-prone areas, we are attacked with frivolous litigation from radical environmentalists who would rather see forests and communities burn than see a logger in the woods."
The former Montana congressman's op-ed was slammed by critics on social media--as was CNN's interpretation of Zinke's proposal. The cable network published its own article describing the Interior Secretary's aim to clear forests as a "proactive approach."
\u201cMajor #wildfires from suburban spread, forest management and changing climate. \n #resilience @Weather_West \nhttps://t.co/W8dm5hqzRN\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
\u201c... but not from \u201cradical environmentalism\u201d, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. @Interior @SecretaryZinke https://t.co/qQbOtdbwf2 #wildfires\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
While containing wildfires and stopping them from forming may require multi-pronged efforts, Zinke's idea of "forest management"--which includes allowing logging companies to clear more forests--would do little to help, according to wildfire expert Michael Kodas.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas toldWyoming Public Media on Tuesday. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."
Instead, Nate Hegyi wrote, "according to Kodas, climate change, longer fire seasons, and way more people in the West all play a part."
Three scientists writing at the Guardian also focused on the climate crisis as the major cause of wildfires which Zinke and President Donald Trump have failed to mention as the Mendocino Complex and other fires have raged.
"Declining spring snowpack and increased evaporation have reduced the moisture available to plants later in summer and autumn," wrote Daniel Swain, Crystal Kolden, and John Abatzoglou. "The fire season itself is lengthening: not only have autumn and spring temperatures risen, but there are signs that California's already short rainy season is becoming further compressed into the winter months. We are truly burning the candle at both ends."
Zinke's op-ed is just the latest sign that the Interior Secretary is pushing to give favorable treatment to industries at the expense of public lands. The piece was published two weeks after the Washington Postreported on "thousands of pages of email correspondence" which showed how Zinke and his aides "tailored their survey of protected sites to emphasize the value of logging, ranching, and energy development that would be unlocked if they were not designated national monuments."
\u201cDOI internal documents released by accident reveal that Ryan Zinke and his team obscured benefits of monuments to the public on purpose while playing up the benefits of logging and drilling.\n\nThe decision to try to hide these documents from the public was "possibly illegal." https://t.co/QXXWQF237M\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1532370127
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Instead of addressing the root causes that scientists and experts say are fueling some of the unprecedented wildfires now ravaging communities in California and other western states, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is himself under fire on Wednesday after penning an op-ed that critics argue shows the top Trump official exploiting the ongoing infernos as a way to push the business interests of logging companies and other extractive industries.
"Radical environmentalists," he argued on USA Today's opinion page, are to blame for blazes like the Mendocino Complex Fire, which became the largest in the state's history this week, due to their calls to protect federal lands and national monuments instead of opening them up to loggers, ranchers, and the fossil fuel industry.
"Every year we watch our forests burn, and every year there is a call for action," Zinke wrote. "Yet, when action comes, and we try to thin forests of dead and dying timber, or we try to sustainably harvest timber from dense and fire-prone areas, we are attacked with frivolous litigation from radical environmentalists who would rather see forests and communities burn than see a logger in the woods."
The former Montana congressman's op-ed was slammed by critics on social media--as was CNN's interpretation of Zinke's proposal. The cable network published its own article describing the Interior Secretary's aim to clear forests as a "proactive approach."
\u201cMajor #wildfires from suburban spread, forest management and changing climate. \n #resilience @Weather_West \nhttps://t.co/W8dm5hqzRN\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
\u201c... but not from \u201cradical environmentalism\u201d, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. @Interior @SecretaryZinke https://t.co/qQbOtdbwf2 #wildfires\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
While containing wildfires and stopping them from forming may require multi-pronged efforts, Zinke's idea of "forest management"--which includes allowing logging companies to clear more forests--would do little to help, according to wildfire expert Michael Kodas.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas toldWyoming Public Media on Tuesday. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."
Instead, Nate Hegyi wrote, "according to Kodas, climate change, longer fire seasons, and way more people in the West all play a part."
Three scientists writing at the Guardian also focused on the climate crisis as the major cause of wildfires which Zinke and President Donald Trump have failed to mention as the Mendocino Complex and other fires have raged.
"Declining spring snowpack and increased evaporation have reduced the moisture available to plants later in summer and autumn," wrote Daniel Swain, Crystal Kolden, and John Abatzoglou. "The fire season itself is lengthening: not only have autumn and spring temperatures risen, but there are signs that California's already short rainy season is becoming further compressed into the winter months. We are truly burning the candle at both ends."
Zinke's op-ed is just the latest sign that the Interior Secretary is pushing to give favorable treatment to industries at the expense of public lands. The piece was published two weeks after the Washington Postreported on "thousands of pages of email correspondence" which showed how Zinke and his aides "tailored their survey of protected sites to emphasize the value of logging, ranching, and energy development that would be unlocked if they were not designated national monuments."
\u201cDOI internal documents released by accident reveal that Ryan Zinke and his team obscured benefits of monuments to the public on purpose while playing up the benefits of logging and drilling.\n\nThe decision to try to hide these documents from the public was "possibly illegal." https://t.co/QXXWQF237M\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1532370127
Instead of addressing the root causes that scientists and experts say are fueling some of the unprecedented wildfires now ravaging communities in California and other western states, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is himself under fire on Wednesday after penning an op-ed that critics argue shows the top Trump official exploiting the ongoing infernos as a way to push the business interests of logging companies and other extractive industries.
"Radical environmentalists," he argued on USA Today's opinion page, are to blame for blazes like the Mendocino Complex Fire, which became the largest in the state's history this week, due to their calls to protect federal lands and national monuments instead of opening them up to loggers, ranchers, and the fossil fuel industry.
"Every year we watch our forests burn, and every year there is a call for action," Zinke wrote. "Yet, when action comes, and we try to thin forests of dead and dying timber, or we try to sustainably harvest timber from dense and fire-prone areas, we are attacked with frivolous litigation from radical environmentalists who would rather see forests and communities burn than see a logger in the woods."
The former Montana congressman's op-ed was slammed by critics on social media--as was CNN's interpretation of Zinke's proposal. The cable network published its own article describing the Interior Secretary's aim to clear forests as a "proactive approach."
\u201cMajor #wildfires from suburban spread, forest management and changing climate. \n #resilience @Weather_West \nhttps://t.co/W8dm5hqzRN\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
\u201c... but not from \u201cradical environmentalism\u201d, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. @Interior @SecretaryZinke https://t.co/qQbOtdbwf2 #wildfires\u201d— \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@\ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f) 1533729832
While containing wildfires and stopping them from forming may require multi-pronged efforts, Zinke's idea of "forest management"--which includes allowing logging companies to clear more forests--would do little to help, according to wildfire expert Michael Kodas.
"A logging company would like to come in and remove the big, granddaddy trees that are really valuable as timber," Kodas toldWyoming Public Media on Tuesday. "Most of what needs to be removed from these forests are brush, scrub, small, spindly trees that have been sick that have almost no economic value."
Instead, Nate Hegyi wrote, "according to Kodas, climate change, longer fire seasons, and way more people in the West all play a part."
Three scientists writing at the Guardian also focused on the climate crisis as the major cause of wildfires which Zinke and President Donald Trump have failed to mention as the Mendocino Complex and other fires have raged.
"Declining spring snowpack and increased evaporation have reduced the moisture available to plants later in summer and autumn," wrote Daniel Swain, Crystal Kolden, and John Abatzoglou. "The fire season itself is lengthening: not only have autumn and spring temperatures risen, but there are signs that California's already short rainy season is becoming further compressed into the winter months. We are truly burning the candle at both ends."
Zinke's op-ed is just the latest sign that the Interior Secretary is pushing to give favorable treatment to industries at the expense of public lands. The piece was published two weeks after the Washington Postreported on "thousands of pages of email correspondence" which showed how Zinke and his aides "tailored their survey of protected sites to emphasize the value of logging, ranching, and energy development that would be unlocked if they were not designated national monuments."
\u201cDOI internal documents released by accident reveal that Ryan Zinke and his team obscured benefits of monuments to the public on purpose while playing up the benefits of logging and drilling.\n\nThe decision to try to hide these documents from the public was "possibly illegal." https://t.co/QXXWQF237M\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1532370127