Aug 01, 2018
With legal experts already warning that a tweet from President Donald Trump earlier in the day calling on Attorney Jeff Sessions to end the Mueller probe "right now" could constitute a direct and very public act of obstruction of justice, the president's personal legal team jumped into action in what appeared like an effort to save their client's ass.
According to the Washington Post, who received comment from both Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, the pair of Trump's personal attorneys were quickly trying to put out the fire by saying that what Trump said was not an "explicit command" or an official presidential order.
"He carefully used the word, 'should,'" Giuliani told the Post. And Sekulow reportedly added: "The president has issued no order or direction to the Department of Justice on this."
\u201cRudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow be like cleanup on aisle 5 today over Trumps demands Sessions shut down Mueller probe\u201d— Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff (@Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff) 1533143132
The president's team also issued a statement to ABC News. "We have been saying for months that it is time to bring this inquiry to an end," Giuliani declared. "The President has expressed the same opinion."
"The President was expressing his opinion on his favored medium for asserting his First Amendment right of free speech," Giuliani added. "He said 'should' not 'must' and no Presidential order was issued or will be."
Giuliani also spoke with Fox News' Howard Kurt:
\u201cGiuliani also tells me that Trump "didn't say anything I haven't said" on television, "the investigation should be concluded"\u201d— HowardKurtz (@HowardKurtz) 1533143633
Turns out, however, that Giuliani is neither the President of the United States nor are any members of his historic presidential campaign (remember that?) currently under indictment due to the investigative reach of the Special Counsel's office.
The bigger question, however, is whether or not his legal team's rapid-response media performance is enough to put the possible obstruction of justice offense by the president back in the bottle.
In a Twitter thread explaining the gravity of Trump's demand, Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), indicated that might not be so easily done.
\u201c2/4 The President trying to undercut and shut down an investigation into himself and those around him goes against core democratic values. It also could be part of a pattern of obstructive conduct and help establish the corrupt intent needed to prove obstruction of justice.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
\u201c4/4 Finally it is completely inappropriate for the President to comment in explosive terms on the Manafort case federal prosecutors currently have in trial and potentially try to sway jurors. Other than that, great tweets this morning!\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With legal experts already warning that a tweet from President Donald Trump earlier in the day calling on Attorney Jeff Sessions to end the Mueller probe "right now" could constitute a direct and very public act of obstruction of justice, the president's personal legal team jumped into action in what appeared like an effort to save their client's ass.
According to the Washington Post, who received comment from both Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, the pair of Trump's personal attorneys were quickly trying to put out the fire by saying that what Trump said was not an "explicit command" or an official presidential order.
"He carefully used the word, 'should,'" Giuliani told the Post. And Sekulow reportedly added: "The president has issued no order or direction to the Department of Justice on this."
\u201cRudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow be like cleanup on aisle 5 today over Trumps demands Sessions shut down Mueller probe\u201d— Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff (@Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff) 1533143132
The president's team also issued a statement to ABC News. "We have been saying for months that it is time to bring this inquiry to an end," Giuliani declared. "The President has expressed the same opinion."
"The President was expressing his opinion on his favored medium for asserting his First Amendment right of free speech," Giuliani added. "He said 'should' not 'must' and no Presidential order was issued or will be."
Giuliani also spoke with Fox News' Howard Kurt:
\u201cGiuliani also tells me that Trump "didn't say anything I haven't said" on television, "the investigation should be concluded"\u201d— HowardKurtz (@HowardKurtz) 1533143633
Turns out, however, that Giuliani is neither the President of the United States nor are any members of his historic presidential campaign (remember that?) currently under indictment due to the investigative reach of the Special Counsel's office.
The bigger question, however, is whether or not his legal team's rapid-response media performance is enough to put the possible obstruction of justice offense by the president back in the bottle.
In a Twitter thread explaining the gravity of Trump's demand, Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), indicated that might not be so easily done.
\u201c2/4 The President trying to undercut and shut down an investigation into himself and those around him goes against core democratic values. It also could be part of a pattern of obstructive conduct and help establish the corrupt intent needed to prove obstruction of justice.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
\u201c4/4 Finally it is completely inappropriate for the President to comment in explosive terms on the Manafort case federal prosecutors currently have in trial and potentially try to sway jurors. Other than that, great tweets this morning!\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
With legal experts already warning that a tweet from President Donald Trump earlier in the day calling on Attorney Jeff Sessions to end the Mueller probe "right now" could constitute a direct and very public act of obstruction of justice, the president's personal legal team jumped into action in what appeared like an effort to save their client's ass.
According to the Washington Post, who received comment from both Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, the pair of Trump's personal attorneys were quickly trying to put out the fire by saying that what Trump said was not an "explicit command" or an official presidential order.
"He carefully used the word, 'should,'" Giuliani told the Post. And Sekulow reportedly added: "The president has issued no order or direction to the Department of Justice on this."
\u201cRudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow be like cleanup on aisle 5 today over Trumps demands Sessions shut down Mueller probe\u201d— Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff (@Koko \u270a\ud83c\udffc\u270a\ud83c\udffd\u270a\ud83c\udfff) 1533143132
The president's team also issued a statement to ABC News. "We have been saying for months that it is time to bring this inquiry to an end," Giuliani declared. "The President has expressed the same opinion."
"The President was expressing his opinion on his favored medium for asserting his First Amendment right of free speech," Giuliani added. "He said 'should' not 'must' and no Presidential order was issued or will be."
Giuliani also spoke with Fox News' Howard Kurt:
\u201cGiuliani also tells me that Trump "didn't say anything I haven't said" on television, "the investigation should be concluded"\u201d— HowardKurtz (@HowardKurtz) 1533143633
Turns out, however, that Giuliani is neither the President of the United States nor are any members of his historic presidential campaign (remember that?) currently under indictment due to the investigative reach of the Special Counsel's office.
The bigger question, however, is whether or not his legal team's rapid-response media performance is enough to put the possible obstruction of justice offense by the president back in the bottle.
In a Twitter thread explaining the gravity of Trump's demand, Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), indicated that might not be so easily done.
\u201c2/4 The President trying to undercut and shut down an investigation into himself and those around him goes against core democratic values. It also could be part of a pattern of obstructive conduct and help establish the corrupt intent needed to prove obstruction of justice.\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
\u201c4/4 Finally it is completely inappropriate for the President to comment in explosive terms on the Manafort case federal prosecutors currently have in trial and potentially try to sway jurors. Other than that, great tweets this morning!\u201d— Noah Bookbinder (@Noah Bookbinder) 1533139904
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.