SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
United Airlines passengers wait in the boarding area for their flights at Denver International Airport in Denver, Colorado. (Photo: Robert Alexander/Getty Images)
A domestic surveillance program called Quiet Skies--which is operated by the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, and was revealed Saturday in a "blockbuster" Boston Globe expose--is provoking strong criticism, with the ACLU asserting that "such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
"Such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
--ACLU
"Already under Quiet Skies, thousands of unsuspecting Americans have been subjected to targeted airport and inflight surveillance," the Globe reports, citing documents and people within the department. The program, which launched in March, uses armed federal air marshals to covertly monitor how U.S. citizens behave on commercial domestic flights.
The undercover marshals are required to take "notes on whether travelers use a phone, go to the bathroom, chat with others, or change clothes." In their reports to TSA, marshals may "document whether passengers fidget, use a computer, have a 'jump' in their Adam's apple or a 'cold penetrating stare,' among other behaviors," according to the Globe's review of agency records.
Although TSA declined to even confirm the existence of Quiet Skies--a spokesman claimed disclosing such information "would make passengers less safe"--in addition obtaining to internal records, the Globe spoke with marshals who "say the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat--a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot, in one case; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, in another; a fellow federal law enforcement officer, in a third."
"Quiet Skies represents a major departure for TSA," the newspaper notes. "Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency has traditionally placed armed air marshals on routes it considered potentially higher risk, or on flights with a passenger on a terrorist watch list. Deploying air marshals to gather intelligence on civilians not on a terrorist watch list is a new assignment, one that some air marshals say goes beyond the mandate of the U.S. Federal Air Marshal Service. Some also worry that such domestic surveillance might be illegal."
"All U.S. citizens who enter the country are automatically screened for inclusion in Quiet Skies--their travel patterns and affiliations are checked and their names run against a terrorist watch list and other databases," the Globe reports.
Hugh Handeyside, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said that "these revelations raise profound concerns about whether TSA is conducting pervasive surveillance of travelers without any suspicion of actual wrongdoing."
"If TSA is using proxies for race or religion to single out travelers for surveillance, that could violate the travelers' constitutional rights," he explained. "These concerns are all the more acute because of TSA's track record of using unreliable and unscientific techniques to screen and monitor travelers who have done nothing wrong."
Readers, too, raised civil rights concerns--one blogger denounced it as "a creepy violation of constitutional rights," while others called it "disquieting" and "disturbing."
Alongside its written report, the Globe published a video about Quiet Skies:
\u201cAir marshals are conducting "secret missions" to tail ordinary travelers not suspected of a crime or on any terrorist watch list: https://t.co/u0M24Jdk3k\u201d— The Boston Globe (@The Boston Globe) 1532822332
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A domestic surveillance program called Quiet Skies--which is operated by the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, and was revealed Saturday in a "blockbuster" Boston Globe expose--is provoking strong criticism, with the ACLU asserting that "such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
"Such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
--ACLU
"Already under Quiet Skies, thousands of unsuspecting Americans have been subjected to targeted airport and inflight surveillance," the Globe reports, citing documents and people within the department. The program, which launched in March, uses armed federal air marshals to covertly monitor how U.S. citizens behave on commercial domestic flights.
The undercover marshals are required to take "notes on whether travelers use a phone, go to the bathroom, chat with others, or change clothes." In their reports to TSA, marshals may "document whether passengers fidget, use a computer, have a 'jump' in their Adam's apple or a 'cold penetrating stare,' among other behaviors," according to the Globe's review of agency records.
Although TSA declined to even confirm the existence of Quiet Skies--a spokesman claimed disclosing such information "would make passengers less safe"--in addition obtaining to internal records, the Globe spoke with marshals who "say the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat--a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot, in one case; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, in another; a fellow federal law enforcement officer, in a third."
"Quiet Skies represents a major departure for TSA," the newspaper notes. "Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency has traditionally placed armed air marshals on routes it considered potentially higher risk, or on flights with a passenger on a terrorist watch list. Deploying air marshals to gather intelligence on civilians not on a terrorist watch list is a new assignment, one that some air marshals say goes beyond the mandate of the U.S. Federal Air Marshal Service. Some also worry that such domestic surveillance might be illegal."
"All U.S. citizens who enter the country are automatically screened for inclusion in Quiet Skies--their travel patterns and affiliations are checked and their names run against a terrorist watch list and other databases," the Globe reports.
Hugh Handeyside, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said that "these revelations raise profound concerns about whether TSA is conducting pervasive surveillance of travelers without any suspicion of actual wrongdoing."
"If TSA is using proxies for race or religion to single out travelers for surveillance, that could violate the travelers' constitutional rights," he explained. "These concerns are all the more acute because of TSA's track record of using unreliable and unscientific techniques to screen and monitor travelers who have done nothing wrong."
Readers, too, raised civil rights concerns--one blogger denounced it as "a creepy violation of constitutional rights," while others called it "disquieting" and "disturbing."
Alongside its written report, the Globe published a video about Quiet Skies:
\u201cAir marshals are conducting "secret missions" to tail ordinary travelers not suspected of a crime or on any terrorist watch list: https://t.co/u0M24Jdk3k\u201d— The Boston Globe (@The Boston Globe) 1532822332
A domestic surveillance program called Quiet Skies--which is operated by the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, and was revealed Saturday in a "blockbuster" Boston Globe expose--is provoking strong criticism, with the ACLU asserting that "such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
"Such surveillance not only makes no sense, it's a waste of taxpayer money and raises constitutional concerns."
--ACLU
"Already under Quiet Skies, thousands of unsuspecting Americans have been subjected to targeted airport and inflight surveillance," the Globe reports, citing documents and people within the department. The program, which launched in March, uses armed federal air marshals to covertly monitor how U.S. citizens behave on commercial domestic flights.
The undercover marshals are required to take "notes on whether travelers use a phone, go to the bathroom, chat with others, or change clothes." In their reports to TSA, marshals may "document whether passengers fidget, use a computer, have a 'jump' in their Adam's apple or a 'cold penetrating stare,' among other behaviors," according to the Globe's review of agency records.
Although TSA declined to even confirm the existence of Quiet Skies--a spokesman claimed disclosing such information "would make passengers less safe"--in addition obtaining to internal records, the Globe spoke with marshals who "say the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat--a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot, in one case; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, in another; a fellow federal law enforcement officer, in a third."
"Quiet Skies represents a major departure for TSA," the newspaper notes. "Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency has traditionally placed armed air marshals on routes it considered potentially higher risk, or on flights with a passenger on a terrorist watch list. Deploying air marshals to gather intelligence on civilians not on a terrorist watch list is a new assignment, one that some air marshals say goes beyond the mandate of the U.S. Federal Air Marshal Service. Some also worry that such domestic surveillance might be illegal."
"All U.S. citizens who enter the country are automatically screened for inclusion in Quiet Skies--their travel patterns and affiliations are checked and their names run against a terrorist watch list and other databases," the Globe reports.
Hugh Handeyside, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said that "these revelations raise profound concerns about whether TSA is conducting pervasive surveillance of travelers without any suspicion of actual wrongdoing."
"If TSA is using proxies for race or religion to single out travelers for surveillance, that could violate the travelers' constitutional rights," he explained. "These concerns are all the more acute because of TSA's track record of using unreliable and unscientific techniques to screen and monitor travelers who have done nothing wrong."
Readers, too, raised civil rights concerns--one blogger denounced it as "a creepy violation of constitutional rights," while others called it "disquieting" and "disturbing."
Alongside its written report, the Globe published a video about Quiet Skies:
\u201cAir marshals are conducting "secret missions" to tail ordinary travelers not suspected of a crime or on any terrorist watch list: https://t.co/u0M24Jdk3k\u201d— The Boston Globe (@The Boston Globe) 1532822332