SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Trump administration has deported more than 460 parents after forcibly separating them from their children. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
'Truly Terrible': As Many as 463 Parents Have Already Been Deported, Putting Family Reunification in Jeopardy
Immigrant rights advocates say parents were deported under false pretense that they could be reunited with children
Jul 24, 2018
As the Trump administration's court-ordered deadline approaches for reuniting all the families it has forcibly separated at the U.S.-Mexico border, Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers advised a U.S. District Court that as many as 463 parents may have already been deported, jeopardizing reunification with their children.
The news comes weeks after reports that many parents had been asked to sign away their rights to asylum by completing so-called "voluntary departure orders" with the understanding that they could be reunited with their children if they agreed to deportation.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered the Trump administration to reunite 2,551 children--ranging in age from five to 17--with their parents and guardians by this Thursday, July 26.
According to the DOJ's court filing, parents who are not currently in the U.S. may not be eligible for reunification with their children.
The ACLU and other immigrant rights advocates have argued that many of the parents who have been deported were pressured to agree to deportation without understanding their rights, following the traumatizing ordeal of family separation--many after fleeing violence and unrest in their home countries.
"If this number turns out to be as large as the report suggests, this is going to be a big issue for us," Stephen Kang, an ACLU attorney representing parents in the case, told the Washington Post. "We have a lot of questions. We have concerns about misinformation given to these parents about their rights to fight deportation without their children."
Last week, Sabraw temporarily halted deportations after the ACLU filed a report saying it needed time to contact and advise parents before they agreed to be deported --but the DOJ's court filing suggests that it was already too late for hundreds of parents.
About 900 parents had deportation orders as of Monday, and the ACLU is seeking a court order that would halt the deportation of parents until after they have been reunited with their children--to avoid worsening the crisis described in the DOJ's filing.
"It's crucial that the decisions they make about the future of their children's asylum claims are informed and non-coerced," wrote Amrit Cheng on the ACLU's "Speak Freely" blog on Monday. "It cannot be made until parents not only have had the time to fully discuss the ramifications with their children, but also to seek legal advice."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As the Trump administration's court-ordered deadline approaches for reuniting all the families it has forcibly separated at the U.S.-Mexico border, Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers advised a U.S. District Court that as many as 463 parents may have already been deported, jeopardizing reunification with their children.
The news comes weeks after reports that many parents had been asked to sign away their rights to asylum by completing so-called "voluntary departure orders" with the understanding that they could be reunited with their children if they agreed to deportation.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered the Trump administration to reunite 2,551 children--ranging in age from five to 17--with their parents and guardians by this Thursday, July 26.
According to the DOJ's court filing, parents who are not currently in the U.S. may not be eligible for reunification with their children.
The ACLU and other immigrant rights advocates have argued that many of the parents who have been deported were pressured to agree to deportation without understanding their rights, following the traumatizing ordeal of family separation--many after fleeing violence and unrest in their home countries.
"If this number turns out to be as large as the report suggests, this is going to be a big issue for us," Stephen Kang, an ACLU attorney representing parents in the case, told the Washington Post. "We have a lot of questions. We have concerns about misinformation given to these parents about their rights to fight deportation without their children."
Last week, Sabraw temporarily halted deportations after the ACLU filed a report saying it needed time to contact and advise parents before they agreed to be deported --but the DOJ's court filing suggests that it was already too late for hundreds of parents.
About 900 parents had deportation orders as of Monday, and the ACLU is seeking a court order that would halt the deportation of parents until after they have been reunited with their children--to avoid worsening the crisis described in the DOJ's filing.
"It's crucial that the decisions they make about the future of their children's asylum claims are informed and non-coerced," wrote Amrit Cheng on the ACLU's "Speak Freely" blog on Monday. "It cannot be made until parents not only have had the time to fully discuss the ramifications with their children, but also to seek legal advice."
As the Trump administration's court-ordered deadline approaches for reuniting all the families it has forcibly separated at the U.S.-Mexico border, Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers advised a U.S. District Court that as many as 463 parents may have already been deported, jeopardizing reunification with their children.
The news comes weeks after reports that many parents had been asked to sign away their rights to asylum by completing so-called "voluntary departure orders" with the understanding that they could be reunited with their children if they agreed to deportation.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered the Trump administration to reunite 2,551 children--ranging in age from five to 17--with their parents and guardians by this Thursday, July 26.
According to the DOJ's court filing, parents who are not currently in the U.S. may not be eligible for reunification with their children.
The ACLU and other immigrant rights advocates have argued that many of the parents who have been deported were pressured to agree to deportation without understanding their rights, following the traumatizing ordeal of family separation--many after fleeing violence and unrest in their home countries.
"If this number turns out to be as large as the report suggests, this is going to be a big issue for us," Stephen Kang, an ACLU attorney representing parents in the case, told the Washington Post. "We have a lot of questions. We have concerns about misinformation given to these parents about their rights to fight deportation without their children."
Last week, Sabraw temporarily halted deportations after the ACLU filed a report saying it needed time to contact and advise parents before they agreed to be deported --but the DOJ's court filing suggests that it was already too late for hundreds of parents.
About 900 parents had deportation orders as of Monday, and the ACLU is seeking a court order that would halt the deportation of parents until after they have been reunited with their children--to avoid worsening the crisis described in the DOJ's filing.
"It's crucial that the decisions they make about the future of their children's asylum claims are informed and non-coerced," wrote Amrit Cheng on the ACLU's "Speak Freely" blog on Monday. "It cannot be made until parents not only have had the time to fully discuss the ramifications with their children, but also to seek legal advice."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy