SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Russian President Vladimir Putin answer questions about the 2016 U.S Election collusion during a joint press conference after their summit on July 16, 2018 in Helsinki, Finland. The two leaders met one-on-one and discussed a range of issues including the 2016 U.S Election collusion. (Photo: Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
Does Putin Actually Have Something on Trump? US Senator Jeff Merkley: 'I Think It's Likely. Yeah.'
Amid fallout over president's performance in Helsinki, the idea of so-called kompromat is feeling increasingly likely to many
Jul 17, 2018
How to explain such behavior? That has become the question for nearly everyone perplexed by President Donald Trump's bizarre performance at Monday's joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And when put to Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) directly this week--Do you think Putin has something on Trump?--the senator responded calmly and simply: "I think it's likely. Yeah."
With a follow-up question in the interview, Buzzfeed's Ben Smith wanted to know if it could actually be the "pee tape"--a reference to an unconfirmed and selacious detail included in the so-called "Steel Dossier." To that specific question, Merkley once again responded calmly: "Something close to that. Something close to that."
Watch:
As Aaron Blake, writing for the Washington Post on Tuesday, notes:
There was a time there when the Steele dossier's alleged, lewd tape of Donald Trump in a Moscow hotel room was Something We Didn't Talk About. Then James B. Comey made it not-so-taboo.
Now the broader idea that Russia has compromising information, or kompromat, on Trump has moved even more to the forefront. And it's all thanks to Trump's decision to hold a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin -- and then practically bow to him.
Writing for The Week, columnist Ryan Cooper says Trump's performance in Helsinki has made it increasingly hard to locate any reasonable explanation for Trump's behaviour and rhetoric when it comes to Russia - specifically towards Putin.
"Despite the fact that much of the rest of the American security apparatus is still bitterly hostile to Russia, and the rest of the government has not taken many concrete pro-Russian actions," writes Cooper, "it is simply beyond question that Trump is really deferential to the Russian president. It could be blackmail, it could be ideological alignment, it could be payback for helping win the election, or it could just be the fact that Trump has had a giant crush on Putin for years and years (or some combination thereof). I suspect this is largely why Trump is being so disruptive towards NATO and the European Union -- the latter of which he called a 'foe' before the summit."
No matter how you cut it, he added, this deference of Trump toward Putin is "a terrible development" for numerous reasons. As Robert Kuttner asked in a piece for The American Prospect on Tuesday, "What could possibly motivate an American president, who lashes out at Canada (Canada!) for a minor slight, to display such credulity when it comes to Russia?"
"What, indeed?" Kuttner continued. "We will soon find out, as the details of Robert Mueller's investigation continue to unfold."
Could it be financial? On Tuesday, new demands went up for Trump to release his tax returns, a call that even some Republican lawmakers have joined.
Strikingly, when Putin was asked rather directly if his government had any incriminating dirt of Trump, the Russian president gave an elaborate answer but ultimately did not deny it.
"It sounds like it's utter nonsense," Putin said of the idea that Russian operatives collected blackmail material from Trump's hotel room while he was in Moscow years ago.
Yeah. Sure. Maybe.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
How to explain such behavior? That has become the question for nearly everyone perplexed by President Donald Trump's bizarre performance at Monday's joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And when put to Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) directly this week--Do you think Putin has something on Trump?--the senator responded calmly and simply: "I think it's likely. Yeah."
With a follow-up question in the interview, Buzzfeed's Ben Smith wanted to know if it could actually be the "pee tape"--a reference to an unconfirmed and selacious detail included in the so-called "Steel Dossier." To that specific question, Merkley once again responded calmly: "Something close to that. Something close to that."
Watch:
As Aaron Blake, writing for the Washington Post on Tuesday, notes:
There was a time there when the Steele dossier's alleged, lewd tape of Donald Trump in a Moscow hotel room was Something We Didn't Talk About. Then James B. Comey made it not-so-taboo.
Now the broader idea that Russia has compromising information, or kompromat, on Trump has moved even more to the forefront. And it's all thanks to Trump's decision to hold a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin -- and then practically bow to him.
Writing for The Week, columnist Ryan Cooper says Trump's performance in Helsinki has made it increasingly hard to locate any reasonable explanation for Trump's behaviour and rhetoric when it comes to Russia - specifically towards Putin.
"Despite the fact that much of the rest of the American security apparatus is still bitterly hostile to Russia, and the rest of the government has not taken many concrete pro-Russian actions," writes Cooper, "it is simply beyond question that Trump is really deferential to the Russian president. It could be blackmail, it could be ideological alignment, it could be payback for helping win the election, or it could just be the fact that Trump has had a giant crush on Putin for years and years (or some combination thereof). I suspect this is largely why Trump is being so disruptive towards NATO and the European Union -- the latter of which he called a 'foe' before the summit."
No matter how you cut it, he added, this deference of Trump toward Putin is "a terrible development" for numerous reasons. As Robert Kuttner asked in a piece for The American Prospect on Tuesday, "What could possibly motivate an American president, who lashes out at Canada (Canada!) for a minor slight, to display such credulity when it comes to Russia?"
"What, indeed?" Kuttner continued. "We will soon find out, as the details of Robert Mueller's investigation continue to unfold."
Could it be financial? On Tuesday, new demands went up for Trump to release his tax returns, a call that even some Republican lawmakers have joined.
Strikingly, when Putin was asked rather directly if his government had any incriminating dirt of Trump, the Russian president gave an elaborate answer but ultimately did not deny it.
"It sounds like it's utter nonsense," Putin said of the idea that Russian operatives collected blackmail material from Trump's hotel room while he was in Moscow years ago.
Yeah. Sure. Maybe.
How to explain such behavior? That has become the question for nearly everyone perplexed by President Donald Trump's bizarre performance at Monday's joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And when put to Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) directly this week--Do you think Putin has something on Trump?--the senator responded calmly and simply: "I think it's likely. Yeah."
With a follow-up question in the interview, Buzzfeed's Ben Smith wanted to know if it could actually be the "pee tape"--a reference to an unconfirmed and selacious detail included in the so-called "Steel Dossier." To that specific question, Merkley once again responded calmly: "Something close to that. Something close to that."
Watch:
As Aaron Blake, writing for the Washington Post on Tuesday, notes:
There was a time there when the Steele dossier's alleged, lewd tape of Donald Trump in a Moscow hotel room was Something We Didn't Talk About. Then James B. Comey made it not-so-taboo.
Now the broader idea that Russia has compromising information, or kompromat, on Trump has moved even more to the forefront. And it's all thanks to Trump's decision to hold a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin -- and then practically bow to him.
Writing for The Week, columnist Ryan Cooper says Trump's performance in Helsinki has made it increasingly hard to locate any reasonable explanation for Trump's behaviour and rhetoric when it comes to Russia - specifically towards Putin.
"Despite the fact that much of the rest of the American security apparatus is still bitterly hostile to Russia, and the rest of the government has not taken many concrete pro-Russian actions," writes Cooper, "it is simply beyond question that Trump is really deferential to the Russian president. It could be blackmail, it could be ideological alignment, it could be payback for helping win the election, or it could just be the fact that Trump has had a giant crush on Putin for years and years (or some combination thereof). I suspect this is largely why Trump is being so disruptive towards NATO and the European Union -- the latter of which he called a 'foe' before the summit."
No matter how you cut it, he added, this deference of Trump toward Putin is "a terrible development" for numerous reasons. As Robert Kuttner asked in a piece for The American Prospect on Tuesday, "What could possibly motivate an American president, who lashes out at Canada (Canada!) for a minor slight, to display such credulity when it comes to Russia?"
"What, indeed?" Kuttner continued. "We will soon find out, as the details of Robert Mueller's investigation continue to unfold."
Could it be financial? On Tuesday, new demands went up for Trump to release his tax returns, a call that even some Republican lawmakers have joined.
Strikingly, when Putin was asked rather directly if his government had any incriminating dirt of Trump, the Russian president gave an elaborate answer but ultimately did not deny it.
"It sounds like it's utter nonsense," Putin said of the idea that Russian operatives collected blackmail material from Trump's hotel room while he was in Moscow years ago.
Yeah. Sure. Maybe.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.