SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Migrant parents are reportedly being given a government form that effectively makes them choose to either pursue an asylum claim or be reunited with their children, but deported. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
ICE Form Confirms Children Being "Held Hostage" to Force Asylum-Seeking Parents to Relinquish Legal Rights
"We are seeing cases where people who have passed credible fear interviews and have pending asylum claims are being given this form," says an ACLU attorney
Jul 03, 2018
Following anecdotal reports last week that the Trump administration had started "using children who have been taken from their parents as pawns--to get detained immigrants to agree to their own deportations and drop their asylum cases," an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) form obtained and published by CNN and NBC News confirmed the directive.
"A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
--Wendy Young, KIND
Although a federal judge last week ordered the reunification of migrant children and parents forcibly separated under the Trump administration's so-called "zero tolerance" policy, attorneys for detained migrants told journalists that their clients are being presented with a form (jpg) that features only two options:
I am requesting to reunite with my child(ren) for the purpose of repatriation to my country of citizenship.
Or:
I am affirmatively, knowingly, and voluntarily requesting to return to my country of citizenship without my minor child(ren) who I understand will remain in the United States to pursue available claims of relief.
As NBC explained: "Asylum law dictates that immigrants should be allowed to make an asylum claim before a judge even if they have been given an order of deportation. Immigration rights advocates say forcing parents to choose immediately between leaving the country with or without their children means they are effectively prevented from asking for asylum."
At the top of the form, immigration agents are instructed to read the two options, in a language detainees understand, to anyone who has a deportation order. However, an SPLC attorney told Nick Valencia at CNN that some asylum-seeking parents are being pressured to sign the form before they see a judge and, in some cases, even before they have a removal order.
Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who is leading a class action lawsuit for family reunification, told NBC, "We are seeing cases where people who have passed credible fear interviews and have pending asylum claims are being given this form."
Those who pass credible fear interviews are typically released on bond while they move forward with an asylum application, though as Mother Jones reported Sunday, ICE also has been "denying bond to some parents who have been separated from their children and are eligible to apply for asylum"--an "unusual move, which can extend the amount of time the families remain separated."
Following that report, and after months of similar allegations documented by immigrant rights advocates, a federal judge ruled late Monday that the Trump administration cannot indefinitely detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings. While the ruling was declared a victory for immigrant rights, activists remain alarmed by the directive that essentially prevents separated families from applying for asylum.
As Wendy Young, president of Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), put it, "A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
The developments come as Attorney General Jeff Session on Tuesday rescinded a Justice Department guidance that allowed refugees and asylum seekers to work, while Senate Democrats demand answers about some 2,300 separated children who remain in U.S. government custody, and as a growing number of politicians and activists add their voices to an angry chorus demanding that the Trump administration immediately #AbolishICE.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following anecdotal reports last week that the Trump administration had started "using children who have been taken from their parents as pawns--to get detained immigrants to agree to their own deportations and drop their asylum cases," an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) form obtained and published by CNN and NBC News confirmed the directive.
"A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
--Wendy Young, KIND
Although a federal judge last week ordered the reunification of migrant children and parents forcibly separated under the Trump administration's so-called "zero tolerance" policy, attorneys for detained migrants told journalists that their clients are being presented with a form (jpg) that features only two options:
I am requesting to reunite with my child(ren) for the purpose of repatriation to my country of citizenship.
Or:
I am affirmatively, knowingly, and voluntarily requesting to return to my country of citizenship without my minor child(ren) who I understand will remain in the United States to pursue available claims of relief.
As NBC explained: "Asylum law dictates that immigrants should be allowed to make an asylum claim before a judge even if they have been given an order of deportation. Immigration rights advocates say forcing parents to choose immediately between leaving the country with or without their children means they are effectively prevented from asking for asylum."
At the top of the form, immigration agents are instructed to read the two options, in a language detainees understand, to anyone who has a deportation order. However, an SPLC attorney told Nick Valencia at CNN that some asylum-seeking parents are being pressured to sign the form before they see a judge and, in some cases, even before they have a removal order.
Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who is leading a class action lawsuit for family reunification, told NBC, "We are seeing cases where people who have passed credible fear interviews and have pending asylum claims are being given this form."
Those who pass credible fear interviews are typically released on bond while they move forward with an asylum application, though as Mother Jones reported Sunday, ICE also has been "denying bond to some parents who have been separated from their children and are eligible to apply for asylum"--an "unusual move, which can extend the amount of time the families remain separated."
Following that report, and after months of similar allegations documented by immigrant rights advocates, a federal judge ruled late Monday that the Trump administration cannot indefinitely detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings. While the ruling was declared a victory for immigrant rights, activists remain alarmed by the directive that essentially prevents separated families from applying for asylum.
As Wendy Young, president of Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), put it, "A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
The developments come as Attorney General Jeff Session on Tuesday rescinded a Justice Department guidance that allowed refugees and asylum seekers to work, while Senate Democrats demand answers about some 2,300 separated children who remain in U.S. government custody, and as a growing number of politicians and activists add their voices to an angry chorus demanding that the Trump administration immediately #AbolishICE.
Following anecdotal reports last week that the Trump administration had started "using children who have been taken from their parents as pawns--to get detained immigrants to agree to their own deportations and drop their asylum cases," an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) form obtained and published by CNN and NBC News confirmed the directive.
"A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
--Wendy Young, KIND
Although a federal judge last week ordered the reunification of migrant children and parents forcibly separated under the Trump administration's so-called "zero tolerance" policy, attorneys for detained migrants told journalists that their clients are being presented with a form (jpg) that features only two options:
I am requesting to reunite with my child(ren) for the purpose of repatriation to my country of citizenship.
Or:
I am affirmatively, knowingly, and voluntarily requesting to return to my country of citizenship without my minor child(ren) who I understand will remain in the United States to pursue available claims of relief.
As NBC explained: "Asylum law dictates that immigrants should be allowed to make an asylum claim before a judge even if they have been given an order of deportation. Immigration rights advocates say forcing parents to choose immediately between leaving the country with or without their children means they are effectively prevented from asking for asylum."
At the top of the form, immigration agents are instructed to read the two options, in a language detainees understand, to anyone who has a deportation order. However, an SPLC attorney told Nick Valencia at CNN that some asylum-seeking parents are being pressured to sign the form before they see a judge and, in some cases, even before they have a removal order.
Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who is leading a class action lawsuit for family reunification, told NBC, "We are seeing cases where people who have passed credible fear interviews and have pending asylum claims are being given this form."
Those who pass credible fear interviews are typically released on bond while they move forward with an asylum application, though as Mother Jones reported Sunday, ICE also has been "denying bond to some parents who have been separated from their children and are eligible to apply for asylum"--an "unusual move, which can extend the amount of time the families remain separated."
Following that report, and after months of similar allegations documented by immigrant rights advocates, a federal judge ruled late Monday that the Trump administration cannot indefinitely detain asylum seekers who are awaiting immigration hearings. While the ruling was declared a victory for immigrant rights, activists remain alarmed by the directive that essentially prevents separated families from applying for asylum.
As Wendy Young, president of Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), put it, "A child should never be held hostage to force a parent to relinquish their legal right to seek asylum."
The developments come as Attorney General Jeff Session on Tuesday rescinded a Justice Department guidance that allowed refugees and asylum seekers to work, while Senate Democrats demand answers about some 2,300 separated children who remain in U.S. government custody, and as a growing number of politicians and activists add their voices to an angry chorus demanding that the Trump administration immediately #AbolishICE.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.