SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Scott Pruitt speaking at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
'Where Are Scott Pruitt's Emails?' Sierra Club Demands After FOIA Request Turns Up Only One Message Sent by EPA Chief
"The idea that Scott Pruitt sent a single work-related external email during nearly a year leading EPA is absurd on its face."
Jun 22, 2018
The Sierra Club and a government watchdog raised questions over the result of a FOIA request regarding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Scott Pruitt's four work-related email accounts, after the information released showed that he had sent just one external email over 10 months as head of the agency.
\u201cBREAKING: According to his spokesman, Scott Pruitt communicates "mostly in person through conversations" \n\nYeah right.\n\nWe\u2019re demanding his personal accounts be searched for work emails.\nhttps://t.co/BXqXMsXVvS\u201d— Sierra Club (@Sierra Club) 1529670528
\u201cWhere are Scott Pruitt's emails? In response to @SierraClub lawsuit, EPA says Pruitt only sent one email outside the agency in 10 months. Thats... not credible. New from @emilyhholden https://t.co/XmMJEHgubR\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
The Sierra Club, which has fought for more than a year to gain information on Pruitt's activities, issued a statement demanding that the EPA search the administrator's personal email accounts for messages related to his work leading the agency, which has been heavily focused on rolling back environmental safeguards and giving favorable treatment to the fossil fuel industry.
"The idea that Scott Pruitt sent a single work-related external email during nearly a year leading EPA is absurd on its face," said Justine Thompson Cowan, an attorney who has led the Sierra Club's lawsuit against the EPA over the agency's failure to respond to FOIA requests in a timely manner. "That's why the Sierra Club is demanding that EPA search Pruitt's personal email accounts for work-related communications, or certify definitively that he does not use personal email or secretive messaging applications like WhatsApp and Signal to circumvent records retention laws."
As Politico reported, Pruitt's personal email accounts should have already been reviewed by the EPA as part of the FOIA request:
Government officials can legally use private email accounts, but agencies are supposed to search those accounts when fulfilling public records requests.
The only external email turned up by the Sierra Club's FOIA request was sent by Pruitt last September to a consultant, regarding an event organized by the American Council for Capital Formation, a free market think tank. In November he also forwarded an email regarding a speaking engagement request to an email account whose name the EPA redacted in its FOIA documents.
"Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it and who's influencing those decisions." --Melanie Sloan, American Oversight
Pruitt has been under fire for ethical violations for much of his time as administrator, including the secrecy with which he's conducted government business.
The former Oklahoma attorney general refused to release his public schedule, restricted staffers from entering his office, and ordered a $25,000 soundproof phone booth for his office.
While EPA officials have claimed that Pruitt conducts much of his business via phone, watchdog group American Oversight obtained the administrator's phone records and found that the administrator has gone weeks without using his desk or cell phones at the EPA.
\u201c@SierraClub @emilyhholden EPA claims Scott Pruitt uses his phone instead of emailing -- but we got his desk and cell phone logs, and they show weeks of no activity. https://t.co/PySjLiXnCg\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
Pruitt's apparent refusal to carry out government business using a government email address, which is subject to public records-keeping laws, is cause for more concern over the interests he is serving as head of the EPA.
"The emails, if they exist, could show what these people want and then those emails could be compared to what the EPA does," Melanie Sloan, a senior adviser at the watchdog group American Oversight, told Politico. "Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it, and who's influencing those decisions."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Sierra Club and a government watchdog raised questions over the result of a FOIA request regarding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Scott Pruitt's four work-related email accounts, after the information released showed that he had sent just one external email over 10 months as head of the agency.
\u201cBREAKING: According to his spokesman, Scott Pruitt communicates "mostly in person through conversations" \n\nYeah right.\n\nWe\u2019re demanding his personal accounts be searched for work emails.\nhttps://t.co/BXqXMsXVvS\u201d— Sierra Club (@Sierra Club) 1529670528
\u201cWhere are Scott Pruitt's emails? In response to @SierraClub lawsuit, EPA says Pruitt only sent one email outside the agency in 10 months. Thats... not credible. New from @emilyhholden https://t.co/XmMJEHgubR\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
The Sierra Club, which has fought for more than a year to gain information on Pruitt's activities, issued a statement demanding that the EPA search the administrator's personal email accounts for messages related to his work leading the agency, which has been heavily focused on rolling back environmental safeguards and giving favorable treatment to the fossil fuel industry.
"The idea that Scott Pruitt sent a single work-related external email during nearly a year leading EPA is absurd on its face," said Justine Thompson Cowan, an attorney who has led the Sierra Club's lawsuit against the EPA over the agency's failure to respond to FOIA requests in a timely manner. "That's why the Sierra Club is demanding that EPA search Pruitt's personal email accounts for work-related communications, or certify definitively that he does not use personal email or secretive messaging applications like WhatsApp and Signal to circumvent records retention laws."
As Politico reported, Pruitt's personal email accounts should have already been reviewed by the EPA as part of the FOIA request:
Government officials can legally use private email accounts, but agencies are supposed to search those accounts when fulfilling public records requests.
The only external email turned up by the Sierra Club's FOIA request was sent by Pruitt last September to a consultant, regarding an event organized by the American Council for Capital Formation, a free market think tank. In November he also forwarded an email regarding a speaking engagement request to an email account whose name the EPA redacted in its FOIA documents.
"Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it and who's influencing those decisions." --Melanie Sloan, American Oversight
Pruitt has been under fire for ethical violations for much of his time as administrator, including the secrecy with which he's conducted government business.
The former Oklahoma attorney general refused to release his public schedule, restricted staffers from entering his office, and ordered a $25,000 soundproof phone booth for his office.
While EPA officials have claimed that Pruitt conducts much of his business via phone, watchdog group American Oversight obtained the administrator's phone records and found that the administrator has gone weeks without using his desk or cell phones at the EPA.
\u201c@SierraClub @emilyhholden EPA claims Scott Pruitt uses his phone instead of emailing -- but we got his desk and cell phone logs, and they show weeks of no activity. https://t.co/PySjLiXnCg\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
Pruitt's apparent refusal to carry out government business using a government email address, which is subject to public records-keeping laws, is cause for more concern over the interests he is serving as head of the EPA.
"The emails, if they exist, could show what these people want and then those emails could be compared to what the EPA does," Melanie Sloan, a senior adviser at the watchdog group American Oversight, told Politico. "Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it, and who's influencing those decisions."
The Sierra Club and a government watchdog raised questions over the result of a FOIA request regarding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Scott Pruitt's four work-related email accounts, after the information released showed that he had sent just one external email over 10 months as head of the agency.
\u201cBREAKING: According to his spokesman, Scott Pruitt communicates "mostly in person through conversations" \n\nYeah right.\n\nWe\u2019re demanding his personal accounts be searched for work emails.\nhttps://t.co/BXqXMsXVvS\u201d— Sierra Club (@Sierra Club) 1529670528
\u201cWhere are Scott Pruitt's emails? In response to @SierraClub lawsuit, EPA says Pruitt only sent one email outside the agency in 10 months. Thats... not credible. New from @emilyhholden https://t.co/XmMJEHgubR\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
The Sierra Club, which has fought for more than a year to gain information on Pruitt's activities, issued a statement demanding that the EPA search the administrator's personal email accounts for messages related to his work leading the agency, which has been heavily focused on rolling back environmental safeguards and giving favorable treatment to the fossil fuel industry.
"The idea that Scott Pruitt sent a single work-related external email during nearly a year leading EPA is absurd on its face," said Justine Thompson Cowan, an attorney who has led the Sierra Club's lawsuit against the EPA over the agency's failure to respond to FOIA requests in a timely manner. "That's why the Sierra Club is demanding that EPA search Pruitt's personal email accounts for work-related communications, or certify definitively that he does not use personal email or secretive messaging applications like WhatsApp and Signal to circumvent records retention laws."
As Politico reported, Pruitt's personal email accounts should have already been reviewed by the EPA as part of the FOIA request:
Government officials can legally use private email accounts, but agencies are supposed to search those accounts when fulfilling public records requests.
The only external email turned up by the Sierra Club's FOIA request was sent by Pruitt last September to a consultant, regarding an event organized by the American Council for Capital Formation, a free market think tank. In November he also forwarded an email regarding a speaking engagement request to an email account whose name the EPA redacted in its FOIA documents.
"Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it and who's influencing those decisions." --Melanie Sloan, American Oversight
Pruitt has been under fire for ethical violations for much of his time as administrator, including the secrecy with which he's conducted government business.
The former Oklahoma attorney general refused to release his public schedule, restricted staffers from entering his office, and ordered a $25,000 soundproof phone booth for his office.
While EPA officials have claimed that Pruitt conducts much of his business via phone, watchdog group American Oversight obtained the administrator's phone records and found that the administrator has gone weeks without using his desk or cell phones at the EPA.
\u201c@SierraClub @emilyhholden EPA claims Scott Pruitt uses his phone instead of emailing -- but we got his desk and cell phone logs, and they show weeks of no activity. https://t.co/PySjLiXnCg\u201d— American Oversight (@American Oversight) 1529672211
Pruitt's apparent refusal to carry out government business using a government email address, which is subject to public records-keeping laws, is cause for more concern over the interests he is serving as head of the EPA.
"The emails, if they exist, could show what these people want and then those emails could be compared to what the EPA does," Melanie Sloan, a senior adviser at the watchdog group American Oversight, told Politico. "Americans should know what the EPA is doing, why it's doing it, and who's influencing those decisions."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.