SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
B61 nuclear bombs on a rack. (Photo:US Department of Defense)
'No Such Thing as a Small Nuclear Weapon': Barbara Lee Condemns GOP for Embracing Mini-Nukes
"Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless."
Jun 08, 2018
Lamenting the defeat of her amendment to defund the Pentagon's $65 million program for so-called "low-yield" nuclear weapons in a House's appropriations bill on Thursday, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif) warned of the existential threat these weapons represent as they fuel a new arms race in an increasingly dangerous world.
"Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences." --Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)"There is no such thing as a small nuclear weapon," Lee declared after the amendment was defeated in a 241 to 177 vote--along mostly partisan lines--in the GOP-controlled House. The full roll call is here.
"Spending $65 million on a low-yield nuclear weapon - with unprecedented submarine-launch capability - heightens the risk of nuclear war," Lee added. "We should be de-escalating tensions with our allies, not provoking a new nuclear arms race."
Overall the spending in question involves the 2019 Energy and Water appropriations bill, which covers the nation's nuclear weapons program, including an estimated $44.7 billion for annual funding--nearly $9 billion more than requested by the president.
Lee's amendment called for cutting all $65 million for the W76-2 warhead--a 100 kiloton nuclear weapon, which is more than six times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima--and transferring those funds to a government nuclear nonproliferation account.
As Defense News reports, "The Pentagon's Nuclear Posture Review calls for two nuclear designs: a low-yield variant of the W76 on Trident II missiles aboard America's nuclear submarines and a potential new sea-launched nuclear cruise missile."
The nonproliferation fund, Lee said, operates a program that "is critical to reducing the spread of nuclear weapons here at home and abroad. Instead of sinking more money into nuclear weapons that don't enhance our national security, we should be preventing the proliferation of nuclear material and enforcing the treaties and arms control agreements on the books."
She added, "Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lamenting the defeat of her amendment to defund the Pentagon's $65 million program for so-called "low-yield" nuclear weapons in a House's appropriations bill on Thursday, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif) warned of the existential threat these weapons represent as they fuel a new arms race in an increasingly dangerous world.
"Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences." --Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)"There is no such thing as a small nuclear weapon," Lee declared after the amendment was defeated in a 241 to 177 vote--along mostly partisan lines--in the GOP-controlled House. The full roll call is here.
"Spending $65 million on a low-yield nuclear weapon - with unprecedented submarine-launch capability - heightens the risk of nuclear war," Lee added. "We should be de-escalating tensions with our allies, not provoking a new nuclear arms race."
Overall the spending in question involves the 2019 Energy and Water appropriations bill, which covers the nation's nuclear weapons program, including an estimated $44.7 billion for annual funding--nearly $9 billion more than requested by the president.
Lee's amendment called for cutting all $65 million for the W76-2 warhead--a 100 kiloton nuclear weapon, which is more than six times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima--and transferring those funds to a government nuclear nonproliferation account.
As Defense News reports, "The Pentagon's Nuclear Posture Review calls for two nuclear designs: a low-yield variant of the W76 on Trident II missiles aboard America's nuclear submarines and a potential new sea-launched nuclear cruise missile."
The nonproliferation fund, Lee said, operates a program that "is critical to reducing the spread of nuclear weapons here at home and abroad. Instead of sinking more money into nuclear weapons that don't enhance our national security, we should be preventing the proliferation of nuclear material and enforcing the treaties and arms control agreements on the books."
She added, "Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences."
Lamenting the defeat of her amendment to defund the Pentagon's $65 million program for so-called "low-yield" nuclear weapons in a House's appropriations bill on Thursday, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif) warned of the existential threat these weapons represent as they fuel a new arms race in an increasingly dangerous world.
"Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences." --Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)"There is no such thing as a small nuclear weapon," Lee declared after the amendment was defeated in a 241 to 177 vote--along mostly partisan lines--in the GOP-controlled House. The full roll call is here.
"Spending $65 million on a low-yield nuclear weapon - with unprecedented submarine-launch capability - heightens the risk of nuclear war," Lee added. "We should be de-escalating tensions with our allies, not provoking a new nuclear arms race."
Overall the spending in question involves the 2019 Energy and Water appropriations bill, which covers the nation's nuclear weapons program, including an estimated $44.7 billion for annual funding--nearly $9 billion more than requested by the president.
Lee's amendment called for cutting all $65 million for the W76-2 warhead--a 100 kiloton nuclear weapon, which is more than six times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima--and transferring those funds to a government nuclear nonproliferation account.
As Defense News reports, "The Pentagon's Nuclear Posture Review calls for two nuclear designs: a low-yield variant of the W76 on Trident II missiles aboard America's nuclear submarines and a potential new sea-launched nuclear cruise missile."
The nonproliferation fund, Lee said, operates a program that "is critical to reducing the spread of nuclear weapons here at home and abroad. Instead of sinking more money into nuclear weapons that don't enhance our national security, we should be preventing the proliferation of nuclear material and enforcing the treaties and arms control agreements on the books."
She added, "Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.