SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Gutting #TitleX is a blatant attempt to muzzle doctors & deny women their constitutional rights. My colleagues & I won't stand for it," tweeted Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) (Photo: Charlotte Cooper/flickr/cc)
Rep. Barbara Lee Denounces "Most Extreme Effort to Roll Back Women's Healthcare in Decades"
Lee joins pro-choice lawmakers in rejecting administration's new proposal to strip federal funds from facilities that provide abortions
May 18, 2018
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and fellow pro-choice members of Congress shot back at the Trump administration's new proposal to strip federal funds from facilities that provide abortions or make abortion referrals, saying the plan shows "a callous disregard for the well-being of American women and families."
The proposal, sent by the Health and Human Services Department to the White House budget office, would affect not only favorite target of conservatives Planned Parenthood, but "would defund hundreds of independent clinics, as well--and those clinics have very few resources to stay open," as the Abortion Care Network noted.
In the statement released Friday by Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus chair Lee, as well as her co-chair Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), along with Democratic Reps. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), Nita Lowey (N.Y.), Julia Brownley (Calif.), Judy Chu (Calif.), Katherine Clark (Mass.), Suzan DelBene (Wash.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), and Jackie Speier (Calif.), the lawmkers said it showed the administration "will stop at nothing to undermine women's health."
"Make no mistake," they charged, "this proposed rule has one purpose: to limit women's access to care."
"From pushing an ideological abstinence-only agenda and denying low-income families access to contraceptives, to completely ignoring the rule of law and precedents established under Roe v. Wade--it's clear that this administration does not value Americans' rights to accurate health information, comprehensive healthcare, or if and when one chooses to have a family," they said.
Sharing the statement on social media, Rep. Lee said the development marked a "a code red" moment.
As NBC News explained, federal law already
prohibits the use of competitive federal family-planning grant funds for abortion, but organizations like Planned Parenthood have traditionally used the federal money for other health services while using private money for abortions and related services--sometimes at the same facilities and with the same staff.
Based on a Reagan-era regulation and championed by abortion-rights opponents, the new rule would force entities that receive so-called Title X family-planning funding to maintain physical and financial separation between taxpayer-backed operations and any related facilities that perform abortions, support the procedures, or receive referrals about them, [an administration] official said.
The ability to have such physical separations between operations would obviously not be feasible to many providers.
The Abortion Care Network said, "Withholding #TitleX healthcare from entire communities in order to restrict abortion care is a ransom no patient, provider, or community should ever have to pay."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and fellow pro-choice members of Congress shot back at the Trump administration's new proposal to strip federal funds from facilities that provide abortions or make abortion referrals, saying the plan shows "a callous disregard for the well-being of American women and families."
The proposal, sent by the Health and Human Services Department to the White House budget office, would affect not only favorite target of conservatives Planned Parenthood, but "would defund hundreds of independent clinics, as well--and those clinics have very few resources to stay open," as the Abortion Care Network noted.
In the statement released Friday by Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus chair Lee, as well as her co-chair Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), along with Democratic Reps. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), Nita Lowey (N.Y.), Julia Brownley (Calif.), Judy Chu (Calif.), Katherine Clark (Mass.), Suzan DelBene (Wash.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), and Jackie Speier (Calif.), the lawmkers said it showed the administration "will stop at nothing to undermine women's health."
"Make no mistake," they charged, "this proposed rule has one purpose: to limit women's access to care."
"From pushing an ideological abstinence-only agenda and denying low-income families access to contraceptives, to completely ignoring the rule of law and precedents established under Roe v. Wade--it's clear that this administration does not value Americans' rights to accurate health information, comprehensive healthcare, or if and when one chooses to have a family," they said.
Sharing the statement on social media, Rep. Lee said the development marked a "a code red" moment.
As NBC News explained, federal law already
prohibits the use of competitive federal family-planning grant funds for abortion, but organizations like Planned Parenthood have traditionally used the federal money for other health services while using private money for abortions and related services--sometimes at the same facilities and with the same staff.
Based on a Reagan-era regulation and championed by abortion-rights opponents, the new rule would force entities that receive so-called Title X family-planning funding to maintain physical and financial separation between taxpayer-backed operations and any related facilities that perform abortions, support the procedures, or receive referrals about them, [an administration] official said.
The ability to have such physical separations between operations would obviously not be feasible to many providers.
The Abortion Care Network said, "Withholding #TitleX healthcare from entire communities in order to restrict abortion care is a ransom no patient, provider, or community should ever have to pay."
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and fellow pro-choice members of Congress shot back at the Trump administration's new proposal to strip federal funds from facilities that provide abortions or make abortion referrals, saying the plan shows "a callous disregard for the well-being of American women and families."
The proposal, sent by the Health and Human Services Department to the White House budget office, would affect not only favorite target of conservatives Planned Parenthood, but "would defund hundreds of independent clinics, as well--and those clinics have very few resources to stay open," as the Abortion Care Network noted.
In the statement released Friday by Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus chair Lee, as well as her co-chair Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), along with Democratic Reps. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), Nita Lowey (N.Y.), Julia Brownley (Calif.), Judy Chu (Calif.), Katherine Clark (Mass.), Suzan DelBene (Wash.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), and Jackie Speier (Calif.), the lawmkers said it showed the administration "will stop at nothing to undermine women's health."
"Make no mistake," they charged, "this proposed rule has one purpose: to limit women's access to care."
"From pushing an ideological abstinence-only agenda and denying low-income families access to contraceptives, to completely ignoring the rule of law and precedents established under Roe v. Wade--it's clear that this administration does not value Americans' rights to accurate health information, comprehensive healthcare, or if and when one chooses to have a family," they said.
Sharing the statement on social media, Rep. Lee said the development marked a "a code red" moment.
As NBC News explained, federal law already
prohibits the use of competitive federal family-planning grant funds for abortion, but organizations like Planned Parenthood have traditionally used the federal money for other health services while using private money for abortions and related services--sometimes at the same facilities and with the same staff.
Based on a Reagan-era regulation and championed by abortion-rights opponents, the new rule would force entities that receive so-called Title X family-planning funding to maintain physical and financial separation between taxpayer-backed operations and any related facilities that perform abortions, support the procedures, or receive referrals about them, [an administration] official said.
The ability to have such physical separations between operations would obviously not be feasible to many providers.
The Abortion Care Network said, "Withholding #TitleX healthcare from entire communities in order to restrict abortion care is a ransom no patient, provider, or community should ever have to pay."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.