Central Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Gina Haspel is sworn in before the Senate Intelligence Committee during her confirmation hearing to become the next CIA director in the Hart Senate Office Building May 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Haspel Won't Say CIA 'Tortured' and Refuses to Say If Torture Is 'Immoral'
"Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."