To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Central Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Gina Haspel is sworn in before the Senate Intelligence Committee during her confirmation hearing to become the next CIA director in the Hart Senate Office Building May 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
\u201c.@senkamalaharris: "Can you please answer the question?"\n\n@CIA Director Nominee Gina Haspel: "Senator, I think I've answered the question."\n\nSen. Harris: "No, you have not. Do you believe that the previous techniques, now armed with hindsight, do you believe they were immoral?"\u201d— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1525881486
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
\u201c.@senkamalaharris: "Can you please answer the question?"\n\n@CIA Director Nominee Gina Haspel: "Senator, I think I've answered the question."\n\nSen. Harris: "No, you have not. Do you believe that the previous techniques, now armed with hindsight, do you believe they were immoral?"\u201d— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1525881486
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."
After presenting herself as "a typical middle-class American" who was brought up with a strong "moral compass" in her opening remarks before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gina Haspel--President Donald Trump's pick to head the CIA--would not admit that the agency has ever tortured nor would she say that she believes torture is immoral.
Asked repeatedly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) to provide a "yes or no" answer to whether the CIA's torture techniques used in the aftermath of 9/11 were immoral, Haspel repeatedly dodged and at one point strongly endorsed the tactics she reportedly oversaw as an a CIA official, saying the agency "did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country."
Haspel went on to say that while she doesn't believe "torture works" as Trump has suggested, she does think the CIA's "program" elicited "valuable information" from detainees.
Watch:
\u201c.@senkamalaharris: "Can you please answer the question?"\n\n@CIA Director Nominee Gina Haspel: "Senator, I think I've answered the question."\n\nSen. Harris: "No, you have not. Do you believe that the previous techniques, now armed with hindsight, do you believe they were immoral?"\u201d— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1525881486
While the CIA and its many apologists have long attempted to deny or sow confusion over whether certain forms of the agency's abuse constituted torture, legal and human rights experts have been crystal clear that "torture is torture, and waterboarding is not an exception."
Though President Obama once acknowledged how the U.S. "tortured some folks," throughout her prepared statement and during questioning, Haspel repeatedly referred to the CIA as having a "detention and interrogation program" in which she played a pivotal role. However, she avoided at every opportunity use of the word "torture" and never once admitted that the agency "tortured" anybody.
Responding to Senate hearing on Twitter, The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill denounced Haspel's answers to even the most mild and poorly framed questions raised by lawmakers.
"Even through the most mainstream bullshit prism of Senate politics, Haspel's answers were a disgrace," Scahill wrote. "Any Democrat that votes to confirm Haspel should never be allowed to live it down."
After the two-and-a-half hour hearing was finally brought to a close, Scahill concluded, "My god, that was horrid."
