Green groups maintain that Exxon Mobil knew for decades about the effects of its oil and gas development on the climate, and lied to the public and its shareholders about climate crisis. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Image)
Mar 30, 2018
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.