Green groups maintain that Exxon Mobil knew for decades about the effects of its oil and gas development on the climate, and lied to the public and its shareholders about climate crisis. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Image)
Mar 30, 2018
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.