White House Advisor Jared Kushner, watches alongside a member of the Saudi Delegation during a meeting between President Donald Trump and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the Oval Office at the White House on March 20, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch-Pool/Getty Images)
Demands for Federal Probe as Saudi Crown Prince Reportedly Claims Kushner 'In His Pocket'
The reporting, argued a former government ethics chief, "makes one wonder what effect conflicts of interest may be having on our foreign policy and national security."
Already under fire after the revelation last month that officials from at least four foreign governments--the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel and Mexico--have discussed ways to "manipulate" his financial entanglements to their advantage, White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner came under even more scrutiny Wednesday night after The Intercept reported that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) believes that he has Kushner "in his pocket."
"There should be a federal investigation into Trump, Kushner et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE and Israel. Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets."
--Jeremy Scahill, The Intercept
Citing both U.S. officials and and sources "close to the Saudi royal family," The Intercept notes that "Kushner has grown so close to the Saudi and Emirati crown princes that he has communicated with them directly using WhatsApp, a reasonably secure messaging app owned by Facebook and popular in the Middle East."
In addition to further detailing Kushner's sprawling financial conflicts, the new report also raises alarming questions about his possible role in the Saudi Crown Prince's recent so-called "anti-corruption crackdown," which was launched just a week after Kushner took an unannounced trip to Saudi Arabia's capital last October. The trip came months before Kushner's security clearance was downgraded.
According to The Intercept, MbS "told confidants that Kushner had discussed the names of Saudis disloyal to the crown prince"--names he would have learned from reading the President's Daily Brief, which "contained information on Saudi Arabia's evolving political situation, including a handful of names of royal family members opposed to the crown prince's power grab."
While acknowledging that MbS likely already knew the names of his opponents within the kingdom, The Intercept notes that Kushner could have violated federal law if he discussed these names with MbS without authorization from President Donald Trump. A spokesperson for Kushner's lawyer dismissed claims that he divulged the identities of MbS's opponents as "obviously false."
"If Kushner discussed names with MBS as an approved tactic of U.S. foreign policy, the move would be a striking intervention by the U.S. into an unfolding power struggle at the top levels of an allied nation," The Intercept observes. "If Kushner discussed the names with the Saudi prince without presidential authorization, however, he may have violated federal laws around the sharing of classified intelligence."
In response to the explosive new reporting, Jeremy Scahill--a co-founder of The Intercept--argued that there should be a federal probe into "Trump, Kushner, et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE, and Israel."
"Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets," Scahill added.
Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics, argued in a tweet late Wednesday that if The Intercept's reporting is accurate, "it shows the incompetence that comes with nepotism can get people killed."
"It also makes one wonder what effect conflicts of interest may be having on our foreign policy and national security," Shaub concluded.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Already under fire after the revelation last month that officials from at least four foreign governments--the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel and Mexico--have discussed ways to "manipulate" his financial entanglements to their advantage, White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner came under even more scrutiny Wednesday night after The Intercept reported that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) believes that he has Kushner "in his pocket."
"There should be a federal investigation into Trump, Kushner et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE and Israel. Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets."
--Jeremy Scahill, The Intercept
Citing both U.S. officials and and sources "close to the Saudi royal family," The Intercept notes that "Kushner has grown so close to the Saudi and Emirati crown princes that he has communicated with them directly using WhatsApp, a reasonably secure messaging app owned by Facebook and popular in the Middle East."
In addition to further detailing Kushner's sprawling financial conflicts, the new report also raises alarming questions about his possible role in the Saudi Crown Prince's recent so-called "anti-corruption crackdown," which was launched just a week after Kushner took an unannounced trip to Saudi Arabia's capital last October. The trip came months before Kushner's security clearance was downgraded.
According to The Intercept, MbS "told confidants that Kushner had discussed the names of Saudis disloyal to the crown prince"--names he would have learned from reading the President's Daily Brief, which "contained information on Saudi Arabia's evolving political situation, including a handful of names of royal family members opposed to the crown prince's power grab."
While acknowledging that MbS likely already knew the names of his opponents within the kingdom, The Intercept notes that Kushner could have violated federal law if he discussed these names with MbS without authorization from President Donald Trump. A spokesperson for Kushner's lawyer dismissed claims that he divulged the identities of MbS's opponents as "obviously false."
"If Kushner discussed names with MBS as an approved tactic of U.S. foreign policy, the move would be a striking intervention by the U.S. into an unfolding power struggle at the top levels of an allied nation," The Intercept observes. "If Kushner discussed the names with the Saudi prince without presidential authorization, however, he may have violated federal laws around the sharing of classified intelligence."
In response to the explosive new reporting, Jeremy Scahill--a co-founder of The Intercept--argued that there should be a federal probe into "Trump, Kushner, et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE, and Israel."
"Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets," Scahill added.
Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics, argued in a tweet late Wednesday that if The Intercept's reporting is accurate, "it shows the incompetence that comes with nepotism can get people killed."
"It also makes one wonder what effect conflicts of interest may be having on our foreign policy and national security," Shaub concluded.
Already under fire after the revelation last month that officials from at least four foreign governments--the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel and Mexico--have discussed ways to "manipulate" his financial entanglements to their advantage, White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner came under even more scrutiny Wednesday night after The Intercept reported that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) believes that he has Kushner "in his pocket."
"There should be a federal investigation into Trump, Kushner et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE and Israel. Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets."
--Jeremy Scahill, The Intercept
Citing both U.S. officials and and sources "close to the Saudi royal family," The Intercept notes that "Kushner has grown so close to the Saudi and Emirati crown princes that he has communicated with them directly using WhatsApp, a reasonably secure messaging app owned by Facebook and popular in the Middle East."
In addition to further detailing Kushner's sprawling financial conflicts, the new report also raises alarming questions about his possible role in the Saudi Crown Prince's recent so-called "anti-corruption crackdown," which was launched just a week after Kushner took an unannounced trip to Saudi Arabia's capital last October. The trip came months before Kushner's security clearance was downgraded.
According to The Intercept, MbS "told confidants that Kushner had discussed the names of Saudis disloyal to the crown prince"--names he would have learned from reading the President's Daily Brief, which "contained information on Saudi Arabia's evolving political situation, including a handful of names of royal family members opposed to the crown prince's power grab."
While acknowledging that MbS likely already knew the names of his opponents within the kingdom, The Intercept notes that Kushner could have violated federal law if he discussed these names with MbS without authorization from President Donald Trump. A spokesperson for Kushner's lawyer dismissed claims that he divulged the identities of MbS's opponents as "obviously false."
"If Kushner discussed names with MBS as an approved tactic of U.S. foreign policy, the move would be a striking intervention by the U.S. into an unfolding power struggle at the top levels of an allied nation," The Intercept observes. "If Kushner discussed the names with the Saudi prince without presidential authorization, however, he may have violated federal laws around the sharing of classified intelligence."
In response to the explosive new reporting, Jeremy Scahill--a co-founder of The Intercept--argued that there should be a federal probe into "Trump, Kushner, et. al. over their collusion with the Saudis, the UAE, and Israel."
"Kind of amazing how little attention this all gets," Scahill added.
Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics, argued in a tweet late Wednesday that if The Intercept's reporting is accurate, "it shows the incompetence that comes with nepotism can get people killed."
"It also makes one wonder what effect conflicts of interest may be having on our foreign policy and national security," Shaub concluded.