The internet freedom advocacy group Free Press gathered net neutrality supporters outside the FCC headquarters on December 13, as the panel voted to repeal net neutrality protections. (Photo: Free Press/Flickr/cc)
With 'Rock-Solid' Case to Defend Net Neutrality, Free Press Takes FCC to Court
"The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away" net neutrality protections that have the support of an overwhelming majority of Americans, says the group
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."