SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch, right, told CNN host Alisyn Camerota on Friday that the news media "loves" the ratings delivered by mass shootings--a remark that drew condemnation from journalists on social media. (Photo: @CNN/Twitter)
Reporters Call Foul on NRA Claim That Media "Loves" Mass Shootings
"Journalists are humans, not story-pursuing robots salivating for the death of young kids."
Feb 23, 2018
Journalists on social media pushed back on Friday against NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch's claim that the news media "loves" mass shootings because they deliver ratings boosts.
\u201cThis rhetoric is dangerous, and continues the assault on journalists in an effort to paint them as subhuman. Of the thousands of people I know, including hundreds of journalists, I know zero (ZERO) people subhuman enough to "love mass shootings" https://t.co/wBo8y5DPYz\u201d— Ryan Famuliner (@Ryan Famuliner) 1519401104
"Many in legacy media love mass shootings. You guys love it," Loesch said Thursday at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), addressing reporters in the back of the room. "Now I'm not saying that you love the tragedy. But I am saying that you love the ratings. Crying white mothers are ratings gold to you and many in the legacy media."
Loesch's comments echoed those made in a video released this week by the NRA, in which gun rights activist Colion Noir argued, "If there's one organization in this country that has a vested interest in the perpetuation of mass tragedy, it's the mainstream media."
The former Blaze host doubled-down on her comments in a Friday morning interview on CNN with Alisyn Camerota, who told her, "You're wrong on every single level," and argued against her claim that shootings provide a ratings boost for news programs.
"Americans have reached saturation level," said Camerota. "They're so sick of it and it's so heartbreaking that they actually often turn away."
\u201cAlisyn Camerota to NRA spokeswoman: \u201cYou think we love mass shootings? \u2026 It\u2019s just malicious, actually, that you would say that. I don\u2019t know anybody in the media who likes mass shootings\u2026 We pray that there\u2019s never another one.\u201d https://t.co/qzE1DxoncO https://t.co/a0QY03VTYU\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1519393395
Many in the news media have pushed to refine how news stations cover mass shootings, urging journalists to focus less on the perpetrators of attacks. Much of the ongoing coverage of the shooting in Parkland, Florida last week has focused on efforts by survivors to achieve gun control legislation in order to prevent more shootings--a push that is strongly opposed by the NRA.
On social media, many reporters reminded Loesch and her supporters that journalists are members of their communities whose families are put at as much risk as any other American household by the prevalence of military-style semi-automatic firearms like the AR-15.
\u201cThis an unequivocally horrifying thing to say. Journalists are humans, not story-pursuing robots salivating for the death of young kids. We don\u2019t \u201clove mass shootings.\u201d Many of us have kids of our own. I\u2019m floored by this. https://t.co/HmDU6G4NhG\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1519309926
\u201cThis is a disgusting insult to journalists everywhere. NOBODY loves mass shootings. We cry and grieve and fear for our kids just like anyone else. And guess what? Our families are victims of tragedies, too. Do people believe this garbage??? https://t.co/DHNKA5gLRm\u201d— Melissa Luck \u2618 (@Melissa Luck \u2618) 1519327306
Others pointed to the emotional toll covering repeated mass killings--typically with little to no action by legislators in the wake of such attacks, to curb shootings--can take on journalists.
\u201cThe idea that mainstream media loves mass shootings is idiotic & insulting. I covered the VA Tech shootings & was totally unprepared emotionally. Spent nights in hotel room crying after interviewing family & friends of victims. Still affects me. https://t.co/jRwqg6jaFu\u201d— Kevin Manahan (@Kevin Manahan) 1519411040
As Catherine Woodiwiss wrote at Sojourners last July, reporters' prolonged exposure to violent and traumatic events including shootings can correspond with high levels of distress:
In 2014, a study of "frequent and prolonged exposure to deeply disturbing images" published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine found that the frequency with which a journalist watches violent content correlates with the journalist's likelihood of having anxiety, depression, PTSD, or alcoholism.
The Radio Television Digital News Association also released a statement about the NRA's new talking point.
"We are your neighbors. Your friends. We attend the same houses of worship. We go the same classes at the gym. Our children are in the same classes at school...We are deeply affected by tragedy. We are journalists and we do what we do because you have a need to know and understand the world around you."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Journalists on social media pushed back on Friday against NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch's claim that the news media "loves" mass shootings because they deliver ratings boosts.
\u201cThis rhetoric is dangerous, and continues the assault on journalists in an effort to paint them as subhuman. Of the thousands of people I know, including hundreds of journalists, I know zero (ZERO) people subhuman enough to "love mass shootings" https://t.co/wBo8y5DPYz\u201d— Ryan Famuliner (@Ryan Famuliner) 1519401104
"Many in legacy media love mass shootings. You guys love it," Loesch said Thursday at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), addressing reporters in the back of the room. "Now I'm not saying that you love the tragedy. But I am saying that you love the ratings. Crying white mothers are ratings gold to you and many in the legacy media."
Loesch's comments echoed those made in a video released this week by the NRA, in which gun rights activist Colion Noir argued, "If there's one organization in this country that has a vested interest in the perpetuation of mass tragedy, it's the mainstream media."
The former Blaze host doubled-down on her comments in a Friday morning interview on CNN with Alisyn Camerota, who told her, "You're wrong on every single level," and argued against her claim that shootings provide a ratings boost for news programs.
"Americans have reached saturation level," said Camerota. "They're so sick of it and it's so heartbreaking that they actually often turn away."
\u201cAlisyn Camerota to NRA spokeswoman: \u201cYou think we love mass shootings? \u2026 It\u2019s just malicious, actually, that you would say that. I don\u2019t know anybody in the media who likes mass shootings\u2026 We pray that there\u2019s never another one.\u201d https://t.co/qzE1DxoncO https://t.co/a0QY03VTYU\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1519393395
Many in the news media have pushed to refine how news stations cover mass shootings, urging journalists to focus less on the perpetrators of attacks. Much of the ongoing coverage of the shooting in Parkland, Florida last week has focused on efforts by survivors to achieve gun control legislation in order to prevent more shootings--a push that is strongly opposed by the NRA.
On social media, many reporters reminded Loesch and her supporters that journalists are members of their communities whose families are put at as much risk as any other American household by the prevalence of military-style semi-automatic firearms like the AR-15.
\u201cThis an unequivocally horrifying thing to say. Journalists are humans, not story-pursuing robots salivating for the death of young kids. We don\u2019t \u201clove mass shootings.\u201d Many of us have kids of our own. I\u2019m floored by this. https://t.co/HmDU6G4NhG\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1519309926
\u201cThis is a disgusting insult to journalists everywhere. NOBODY loves mass shootings. We cry and grieve and fear for our kids just like anyone else. And guess what? Our families are victims of tragedies, too. Do people believe this garbage??? https://t.co/DHNKA5gLRm\u201d— Melissa Luck \u2618 (@Melissa Luck \u2618) 1519327306
Others pointed to the emotional toll covering repeated mass killings--typically with little to no action by legislators in the wake of such attacks, to curb shootings--can take on journalists.
\u201cThe idea that mainstream media loves mass shootings is idiotic & insulting. I covered the VA Tech shootings & was totally unprepared emotionally. Spent nights in hotel room crying after interviewing family & friends of victims. Still affects me. https://t.co/jRwqg6jaFu\u201d— Kevin Manahan (@Kevin Manahan) 1519411040
As Catherine Woodiwiss wrote at Sojourners last July, reporters' prolonged exposure to violent and traumatic events including shootings can correspond with high levels of distress:
In 2014, a study of "frequent and prolonged exposure to deeply disturbing images" published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine found that the frequency with which a journalist watches violent content correlates with the journalist's likelihood of having anxiety, depression, PTSD, or alcoholism.
The Radio Television Digital News Association also released a statement about the NRA's new talking point.
"We are your neighbors. Your friends. We attend the same houses of worship. We go the same classes at the gym. Our children are in the same classes at school...We are deeply affected by tragedy. We are journalists and we do what we do because you have a need to know and understand the world around you."
Journalists on social media pushed back on Friday against NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch's claim that the news media "loves" mass shootings because they deliver ratings boosts.
\u201cThis rhetoric is dangerous, and continues the assault on journalists in an effort to paint them as subhuman. Of the thousands of people I know, including hundreds of journalists, I know zero (ZERO) people subhuman enough to "love mass shootings" https://t.co/wBo8y5DPYz\u201d— Ryan Famuliner (@Ryan Famuliner) 1519401104
"Many in legacy media love mass shootings. You guys love it," Loesch said Thursday at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), addressing reporters in the back of the room. "Now I'm not saying that you love the tragedy. But I am saying that you love the ratings. Crying white mothers are ratings gold to you and many in the legacy media."
Loesch's comments echoed those made in a video released this week by the NRA, in which gun rights activist Colion Noir argued, "If there's one organization in this country that has a vested interest in the perpetuation of mass tragedy, it's the mainstream media."
The former Blaze host doubled-down on her comments in a Friday morning interview on CNN with Alisyn Camerota, who told her, "You're wrong on every single level," and argued against her claim that shootings provide a ratings boost for news programs.
"Americans have reached saturation level," said Camerota. "They're so sick of it and it's so heartbreaking that they actually often turn away."
\u201cAlisyn Camerota to NRA spokeswoman: \u201cYou think we love mass shootings? \u2026 It\u2019s just malicious, actually, that you would say that. I don\u2019t know anybody in the media who likes mass shootings\u2026 We pray that there\u2019s never another one.\u201d https://t.co/qzE1DxoncO https://t.co/a0QY03VTYU\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1519393395
Many in the news media have pushed to refine how news stations cover mass shootings, urging journalists to focus less on the perpetrators of attacks. Much of the ongoing coverage of the shooting in Parkland, Florida last week has focused on efforts by survivors to achieve gun control legislation in order to prevent more shootings--a push that is strongly opposed by the NRA.
On social media, many reporters reminded Loesch and her supporters that journalists are members of their communities whose families are put at as much risk as any other American household by the prevalence of military-style semi-automatic firearms like the AR-15.
\u201cThis an unequivocally horrifying thing to say. Journalists are humans, not story-pursuing robots salivating for the death of young kids. We don\u2019t \u201clove mass shootings.\u201d Many of us have kids of our own. I\u2019m floored by this. https://t.co/HmDU6G4NhG\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1519309926
\u201cThis is a disgusting insult to journalists everywhere. NOBODY loves mass shootings. We cry and grieve and fear for our kids just like anyone else. And guess what? Our families are victims of tragedies, too. Do people believe this garbage??? https://t.co/DHNKA5gLRm\u201d— Melissa Luck \u2618 (@Melissa Luck \u2618) 1519327306
Others pointed to the emotional toll covering repeated mass killings--typically with little to no action by legislators in the wake of such attacks, to curb shootings--can take on journalists.
\u201cThe idea that mainstream media loves mass shootings is idiotic & insulting. I covered the VA Tech shootings & was totally unprepared emotionally. Spent nights in hotel room crying after interviewing family & friends of victims. Still affects me. https://t.co/jRwqg6jaFu\u201d— Kevin Manahan (@Kevin Manahan) 1519411040
As Catherine Woodiwiss wrote at Sojourners last July, reporters' prolonged exposure to violent and traumatic events including shootings can correspond with high levels of distress:
In 2014, a study of "frequent and prolonged exposure to deeply disturbing images" published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine found that the frequency with which a journalist watches violent content correlates with the journalist's likelihood of having anxiety, depression, PTSD, or alcoholism.
The Radio Television Digital News Association also released a statement about the NRA's new talking point.
"We are your neighbors. Your friends. We attend the same houses of worship. We go the same classes at the gym. Our children are in the same classes at school...We are deeply affected by tragedy. We are journalists and we do what we do because you have a need to know and understand the world around you."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.