To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Oxford University conducted a study of tens of thousands of Twitter and Facebook accounts in recent months, finding that hard-right users and Trump supporters were far more susceptible to misinformation than their progressive and liberal counterparts. (Photo: World's Direction/Flickr/cc)
Trump supporters are the biggest consumers of low-quality, sensationalist news stories on social media, according to a new report by Oxford University.
The study, conducted over three months leading up to President Donald Trump's State of the Union address last week, goes beyond the abundant evidence that Republicans, Democrats, and independents rely on different news sources, finding a clear divide in which social media users consume stories from discredited sources.
Consumers of these accounts are "playing with different facts, and they think they have the inside scoop on conspiracies," lead researcher Philip Howard told McClatchy. "A small chunk of the population isn't able to talk politics or share ideas in a sensible way with the rest of the population."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together."--Computational Propaganda Project, Oxford University
Researchers with the university's Computational Propaganda Project monitored more than 13,000 politically active Twitter users who fell into a number of categories including Trump supporters, Trump Resistance members, and progressives, as well as 48,000 Facebook accounts that showed an interest in political news--ranging from people who expressed anti-immigrant sentiments to those who posted about women's rights and other progressive causes.
The study also identified 91 sources that were identified as dispensing "junk news"--defined as "extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, and fake news."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together," the researchers concluded. "This pattern is repeated on Facebook, where the Hard Conservatives group consumed the highest proportion of junk news."
The report also found that "junk news" made up the largest proportion of news stories shared by the Trump Support contingent on Twitter.
The inundation of a small segment of the population with a false narrative about the country's politics is "a problem for democracy," Howard said. "In an ideal world, everybody would get at least a few of the same news stories. There'd be some shared facts and some shared understanding of the problems."
Oxford's study follows growing concern over the rampant spread of false news on social media, which media experts say influenced the 2016 election. Last month, Facebook announced it would take measures to curb the circulation of misleading or incorrect news stories on its social media platform by de-emphasizing posts by brands and publications. The decision has led to concerns among reputable news outlets that accurate reporting will have a harder time reaching users through the website--making credible news stories a potential casualty of "junk news."
\u201c\u201cFacebook\u2019s upcoming newsfeed change won\u2019t eliminate fake news ... at least, it didn\u2019t in Slovakia. People share sensational or shocking news, while more reliable news tends not to go viral.\u201d https://t.co/hdbo0VpMIc\u201d— Jan Zilinsky (@Jan Zilinsky) 1517816403
\u201c"My relatives will still share fake news on Facebook, and it will show up in my \u201cnews\u201d feed under your new rules. But I won\u2019t see posts from responsible news outlets I choose to follow unless I take several steps to force the newsfeed to prioritize it" https://t.co/g2TJzpowTz\u201d— Mathew Ingram (@Mathew Ingram) 1517498116
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Trump supporters are the biggest consumers of low-quality, sensationalist news stories on social media, according to a new report by Oxford University.
The study, conducted over three months leading up to President Donald Trump's State of the Union address last week, goes beyond the abundant evidence that Republicans, Democrats, and independents rely on different news sources, finding a clear divide in which social media users consume stories from discredited sources.
Consumers of these accounts are "playing with different facts, and they think they have the inside scoop on conspiracies," lead researcher Philip Howard told McClatchy. "A small chunk of the population isn't able to talk politics or share ideas in a sensible way with the rest of the population."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together."--Computational Propaganda Project, Oxford University
Researchers with the university's Computational Propaganda Project monitored more than 13,000 politically active Twitter users who fell into a number of categories including Trump supporters, Trump Resistance members, and progressives, as well as 48,000 Facebook accounts that showed an interest in political news--ranging from people who expressed anti-immigrant sentiments to those who posted about women's rights and other progressive causes.
The study also identified 91 sources that were identified as dispensing "junk news"--defined as "extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, and fake news."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together," the researchers concluded. "This pattern is repeated on Facebook, where the Hard Conservatives group consumed the highest proportion of junk news."
The report also found that "junk news" made up the largest proportion of news stories shared by the Trump Support contingent on Twitter.
The inundation of a small segment of the population with a false narrative about the country's politics is "a problem for democracy," Howard said. "In an ideal world, everybody would get at least a few of the same news stories. There'd be some shared facts and some shared understanding of the problems."
Oxford's study follows growing concern over the rampant spread of false news on social media, which media experts say influenced the 2016 election. Last month, Facebook announced it would take measures to curb the circulation of misleading or incorrect news stories on its social media platform by de-emphasizing posts by brands and publications. The decision has led to concerns among reputable news outlets that accurate reporting will have a harder time reaching users through the website--making credible news stories a potential casualty of "junk news."
\u201c\u201cFacebook\u2019s upcoming newsfeed change won\u2019t eliminate fake news ... at least, it didn\u2019t in Slovakia. People share sensational or shocking news, while more reliable news tends not to go viral.\u201d https://t.co/hdbo0VpMIc\u201d— Jan Zilinsky (@Jan Zilinsky) 1517816403
\u201c"My relatives will still share fake news on Facebook, and it will show up in my \u201cnews\u201d feed under your new rules. But I won\u2019t see posts from responsible news outlets I choose to follow unless I take several steps to force the newsfeed to prioritize it" https://t.co/g2TJzpowTz\u201d— Mathew Ingram (@Mathew Ingram) 1517498116
Trump supporters are the biggest consumers of low-quality, sensationalist news stories on social media, according to a new report by Oxford University.
The study, conducted over three months leading up to President Donald Trump's State of the Union address last week, goes beyond the abundant evidence that Republicans, Democrats, and independents rely on different news sources, finding a clear divide in which social media users consume stories from discredited sources.
Consumers of these accounts are "playing with different facts, and they think they have the inside scoop on conspiracies," lead researcher Philip Howard told McClatchy. "A small chunk of the population isn't able to talk politics or share ideas in a sensible way with the rest of the population."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together."--Computational Propaganda Project, Oxford University
Researchers with the university's Computational Propaganda Project monitored more than 13,000 politically active Twitter users who fell into a number of categories including Trump supporters, Trump Resistance members, and progressives, as well as 48,000 Facebook accounts that showed an interest in political news--ranging from people who expressed anti-immigrant sentiments to those who posted about women's rights and other progressive causes.
The study also identified 91 sources that were identified as dispensing "junk news"--defined as "extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, and fake news."
"The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together," the researchers concluded. "This pattern is repeated on Facebook, where the Hard Conservatives group consumed the highest proportion of junk news."
The report also found that "junk news" made up the largest proportion of news stories shared by the Trump Support contingent on Twitter.
The inundation of a small segment of the population with a false narrative about the country's politics is "a problem for democracy," Howard said. "In an ideal world, everybody would get at least a few of the same news stories. There'd be some shared facts and some shared understanding of the problems."
Oxford's study follows growing concern over the rampant spread of false news on social media, which media experts say influenced the 2016 election. Last month, Facebook announced it would take measures to curb the circulation of misleading or incorrect news stories on its social media platform by de-emphasizing posts by brands and publications. The decision has led to concerns among reputable news outlets that accurate reporting will have a harder time reaching users through the website--making credible news stories a potential casualty of "junk news."
\u201c\u201cFacebook\u2019s upcoming newsfeed change won\u2019t eliminate fake news ... at least, it didn\u2019t in Slovakia. People share sensational or shocking news, while more reliable news tends not to go viral.\u201d https://t.co/hdbo0VpMIc\u201d— Jan Zilinsky (@Jan Zilinsky) 1517816403
\u201c"My relatives will still share fake news on Facebook, and it will show up in my \u201cnews\u201d feed under your new rules. But I won\u2019t see posts from responsible news outlets I choose to follow unless I take several steps to force the newsfeed to prioritize it" https://t.co/g2TJzpowTz\u201d— Mathew Ingram (@Mathew Ingram) 1517498116