

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Thursday's vote in the Senate, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security." (Image: Shutterstock)
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
McCain (R-AZ)
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
McCain (R-AZ)
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
McCain (R-AZ)