Thursday's vote in the Senate, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security." (Image: Shutterstock)
Senate Votes to Give Trump Vast Domestic Spying Powers "No President Should Have"
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant."
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
\u201cBREAKING: The Senate just approved (65-34) an appalling bill to extend Section 702\u2014one of the NSA\u2019s most powerful spying tools. While nominally directed at foreign intelligence surveillance, this bill actually violates Americans' 4th Amendment rights to privacy. (1/10)\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1516297923
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
\u201cNo president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1516300577
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Cotton (R-AR)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Enzi (R-WY)
Ernst (R-IA)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (R-WI)
Jones (D-AL)
Kaine (D-VA)
Kennedy (R-LA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lankford (R-OK)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Nelson (D-FL)
Perdue (R-GA)
Peters (D-MI)
Portman (R-OH)
Reed (D-RI)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rounds (R-SD)
Rubio (R-FL)
Sasse (R-NE)
Schumer (D-NY)
Scott (R-SC)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Toomey (R-PA)
Warner (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Young (R-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Booker (D-NJ)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Coons (D-DE)
Daines (R-MT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Gardner (R-CO)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harris (D-CA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heller (R-NV)
Hirono (D-HI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lee (R-UT)
Markey (D-MA)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Smith (D-MN)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warren (D-MA)
Wyden (D-OR)
McCain (R-AZ)
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
\u201cBREAKING: The Senate just approved (65-34) an appalling bill to extend Section 702\u2014one of the NSA\u2019s most powerful spying tools. While nominally directed at foreign intelligence surveillance, this bill actually violates Americans' 4th Amendment rights to privacy. (1/10)\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1516297923
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
\u201cNo president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1516300577
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Cotton (R-AR)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Enzi (R-WY)
Ernst (R-IA)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (R-WI)
Jones (D-AL)
Kaine (D-VA)
Kennedy (R-LA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lankford (R-OK)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Nelson (D-FL)
Perdue (R-GA)
Peters (D-MI)
Portman (R-OH)
Reed (D-RI)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rounds (R-SD)
Rubio (R-FL)
Sasse (R-NE)
Schumer (D-NY)
Scott (R-SC)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Toomey (R-PA)
Warner (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Young (R-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Booker (D-NJ)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Coons (D-DE)
Daines (R-MT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Gardner (R-CO)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harris (D-CA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heller (R-NV)
Hirono (D-HI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lee (R-UT)
Markey (D-MA)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Smith (D-MN)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warren (D-MA)
Wyden (D-OR)
McCain (R-AZ)
Defenders of civil liberties and privacy advocates expressed their discontent on Thursday after the U.S. Senate passed a bill that reauthorizes and expands the ability of the goverment to spy on the digital communications without a warrant.
With a final vote of 65-34 vote in favor, the passage of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017--now headed to President Donald Trump's desk for a signature--will extend for six years a provision known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows for call the "unconstitutional spying" on emails, text messages, and other digital communications of both Americans and foreign nationals without a warrant.
\u201cBREAKING: The Senate just approved (65-34) an appalling bill to extend Section 702\u2014one of the NSA\u2019s most powerful spying tools. While nominally directed at foreign intelligence surveillance, this bill actually violates Americans' 4th Amendment rights to privacy. (1/10)\u201d— EFF (@EFF) 1516297923
The rollcall of the vote can be found here.
"Congress abdicated its responsibility to ensure that our intelligence agencies respect the Fourth Amendment," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the ACLU, in response.
\u201cNo president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1516300577
Though the ACLU and its allies had backed a number of amendments to address both privacy and constitutional concerns, all those measures were defeated in both the House and Senate.
"Instead of instituting much needed reforms, lawmakers voted to give the Trump administration broad powers to spy on Americans and foreigners at home and abroad without a warrant," said Guliani. "No president should have this power, much less one who has endorsed policies designed to unfairly target critics, immigrants, and minority communities."
The vote, lamented Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "means six more years of FBI access to giant databases of these NSA-collected communications, for purposes of routine domestic law enforcement that stray far from the original justification of national security."
In an open letter to allies who also fight for internet privacy protections, Cohn said that while the passage of the bill is disappointing it would not stop her group from fighting for "a secure digital world, free from government surveillance and censorship."
"While Congress failed the American people today," she said, "[we] will not."
How did your senators vote?
Barrasso (R-WY)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Cotton (R-AR)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Enzi (R-WY)
Ernst (R-IA)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (R-WI)
Jones (D-AL)
Kaine (D-VA)
Kennedy (R-LA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lankford (R-OK)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Nelson (D-FL)
Perdue (R-GA)
Peters (D-MI)
Portman (R-OH)
Reed (D-RI)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rounds (R-SD)
Rubio (R-FL)
Sasse (R-NE)
Schumer (D-NY)
Scott (R-SC)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Toomey (R-PA)
Warner (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Young (R-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Booker (D-NJ)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Coons (D-DE)
Daines (R-MT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Gardner (R-CO)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harris (D-CA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heller (R-NV)
Hirono (D-HI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lee (R-UT)
Markey (D-MA)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Smith (D-MN)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warren (D-MA)
Wyden (D-OR)
McCain (R-AZ)