Published on
by

New Campaign's Message to Lawmakers on Net Neutrality: Listen to Voters or 'Pay at the Polls'

Bid by Fight for the Future to overturn FCC's move ramps up pressure on lawmakers to support a Congressional Review Act

A net neutrality supporter holds a sign during a rally in San Francisco on September 12, 2017. (Photo: Credo Action/flickr/cc)

If digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future has its way, net neutrality will be a key election issue in 2018.

Its new campaign, launched Wednesday, escalates the pressure on U.S. lawmakers to defend net neutrality by voting for a "resolution of disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's recent vote to gut the protections.

"If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."With the CRA, Congress has the power to overturn newly passed regulations with a simple majority vote—and could thus overrule the GOP-controlled commission's widely opposed move.

The campaign website states: "The FCC just ignored the public and killed net neutrality. But in 2018, Congress will have a simple up or down vote on whether to overturn the FCC or betray 83 percent of American voters, in a close election year. If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."

It features a scorecard of lawmakers including the 29 senators who have thus far indicated they will vote for a CRA. "51 to win. 22 to go," it reads.

Supporters can sign onto the pledge that states: "Dear Congress: I just gave my number to Fight for the Future, who will text me your voting record in the run-up to the next election. Unless you vote for a CRA to overturn the FCC net neutrality vote, I will not vote for you."

To ramp up the pressure, constituents can also use the scorecard to click on their senators and tweet at them directly to say, "just FYI, I will not be voting for anyone who doesn't vote for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality," or, conversely, "I will only be voting for folks (like you) who are voting for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality. Thanks!"

According to Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, "The public has spoken and voters are demanding that their lawmakers do their jobs and defend net neutrality. Any lawmaker that ignores the overwhelming consensus among tech experts and this level of public outcry doesn't deserve to be in office. News outlets keep asking whether net neutrality will be an election issue in 2018. We are going to make it one."

Added Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of the group, "Congress has a moral imperative to use their CRA powers to overturn the FCC's rogue action to end the basic principle of the open internet and are supported by the majority of the public. Whoever doesn't will pay at the polls."

Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) last month announced his plan to introduce a CRA to undo the FCC's "historic mistake," saying, "With this CRA, Congress can correct the commission's misguided and partisan decision and keep the internet in the hands of the people, not big corporations."

On Tuesday, he celebrated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) becoming the 29th senator to join the effort and tweeted "To @realDonaldTrump, @AjitPaiFCC and the broadband CEOs: we're not stopping until we #SaveNetNeutrality!"

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Won't Exist.

Share This Article