SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A net neutrality supporter holds a sign during a rally in San Francisco on September 12, 2017. (Photo: Credo Action/flickr/cc)
New Campaign's Message to Lawmakers on Net Neutrality: Listen to Voters or 'Pay at the Polls'
Bid by Fight for the Future to overturn FCC's move ramps up pressure on lawmakers to support a Congressional Review Act
Jan 03, 2018
If digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future has its way, net neutrality will be a key election issue in 2018.
Its new campaign, launched Wednesday, escalates the pressure on U.S. lawmakers to defend net neutrality by voting for a "resolution of disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's recent vote to gut the protections.
"If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."With the CRA, Congress has the power to overturn newly passed regulations with a simple majority vote--and could thus overrule the GOP-controlled commission's widely opposed move.
The campaign website states: "The FCC just ignored the public and killed net neutrality. But in 2018, Congress will have a simple up or down vote on whether to overturn the FCC or betray 83 percent of American voters, in a close election year. If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."
It features a scorecard of lawmakers including the 29 senators who have thus far indicated they will vote for a CRA. "51 to win. 22 to go," it reads.
Supporters can sign onto the pledge that states: "Dear Congress: I just gave my number to Fight for the Future, who will text me your voting record in the run-up to the next election. Unless you vote for a CRA to overturn the FCC net neutrality vote, I will not vote for you."
To ramp up the pressure, constituents can also use the scorecard to click on their senators and tweet at them directly to say, "just FYI, I will not be voting for anyone who doesn't vote for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality," or, conversely, "I will only be voting for folks (like you) who are voting for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality. Thanks!"
According to Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, "The public has spoken and voters are demanding that their lawmakers do their jobs and defend net neutrality. Any lawmaker that ignores the overwhelming consensus among tech experts and this level of public outcry doesn't deserve to be in office. News outlets keep asking whether net neutrality will be an election issue in 2018. We are going to make it one."
Added Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of the group, "Congress has a moral imperative to use their CRA powers to overturn the FCC's rogue action to end the basic principle of the open internet and are supported by the majority of the public. Whoever doesn't will pay at the polls."
Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) last month announced his plan to introduce a CRA to undo the FCC's "historic mistake," saying, "With this CRA, Congress can correct the commission's misguided and partisan decision and keep the internet in the hands of the people, not big corporations."
On Tuesday, he celebrated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) becoming the 29th senator to join the effort and tweeted "To @realDonaldTrump, @AjitPaiFCC and the broadband CEOs: we're not stopping until we #SaveNetNeutrality!"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
If digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future has its way, net neutrality will be a key election issue in 2018.
Its new campaign, launched Wednesday, escalates the pressure on U.S. lawmakers to defend net neutrality by voting for a "resolution of disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's recent vote to gut the protections.
"If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."With the CRA, Congress has the power to overturn newly passed regulations with a simple majority vote--and could thus overrule the GOP-controlled commission's widely opposed move.
The campaign website states: "The FCC just ignored the public and killed net neutrality. But in 2018, Congress will have a simple up or down vote on whether to overturn the FCC or betray 83 percent of American voters, in a close election year. If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."
It features a scorecard of lawmakers including the 29 senators who have thus far indicated they will vote for a CRA. "51 to win. 22 to go," it reads.
Supporters can sign onto the pledge that states: "Dear Congress: I just gave my number to Fight for the Future, who will text me your voting record in the run-up to the next election. Unless you vote for a CRA to overturn the FCC net neutrality vote, I will not vote for you."
To ramp up the pressure, constituents can also use the scorecard to click on their senators and tweet at them directly to say, "just FYI, I will not be voting for anyone who doesn't vote for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality," or, conversely, "I will only be voting for folks (like you) who are voting for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality. Thanks!"
According to Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, "The public has spoken and voters are demanding that their lawmakers do their jobs and defend net neutrality. Any lawmaker that ignores the overwhelming consensus among tech experts and this level of public outcry doesn't deserve to be in office. News outlets keep asking whether net neutrality will be an election issue in 2018. We are going to make it one."
Added Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of the group, "Congress has a moral imperative to use their CRA powers to overturn the FCC's rogue action to end the basic principle of the open internet and are supported by the majority of the public. Whoever doesn't will pay at the polls."
Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) last month announced his plan to introduce a CRA to undo the FCC's "historic mistake," saying, "With this CRA, Congress can correct the commission's misguided and partisan decision and keep the internet in the hands of the people, not big corporations."
On Tuesday, he celebrated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) becoming the 29th senator to join the effort and tweeted "To @realDonaldTrump, @AjitPaiFCC and the broadband CEOs: we're not stopping until we #SaveNetNeutrality!"
If digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future has its way, net neutrality will be a key election issue in 2018.
Its new campaign, launched Wednesday, escalates the pressure on U.S. lawmakers to defend net neutrality by voting for a "resolution of disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's recent vote to gut the protections.
"If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."With the CRA, Congress has the power to overturn newly passed regulations with a simple majority vote--and could thus overrule the GOP-controlled commission's widely opposed move.
The campaign website states: "The FCC just ignored the public and killed net neutrality. But in 2018, Congress will have a simple up or down vote on whether to overturn the FCC or betray 83 percent of American voters, in a close election year. If they don't vote for net neutrality, we won't vote for them. They'll listen, or pay."
It features a scorecard of lawmakers including the 29 senators who have thus far indicated they will vote for a CRA. "51 to win. 22 to go," it reads.
Supporters can sign onto the pledge that states: "Dear Congress: I just gave my number to Fight for the Future, who will text me your voting record in the run-up to the next election. Unless you vote for a CRA to overturn the FCC net neutrality vote, I will not vote for you."
To ramp up the pressure, constituents can also use the scorecard to click on their senators and tweet at them directly to say, "just FYI, I will not be voting for anyone who doesn't vote for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality," or, conversely, "I will only be voting for folks (like you) who are voting for the CRA to save #NetNeutrality. Thanks!"
According to Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, "The public has spoken and voters are demanding that their lawmakers do their jobs and defend net neutrality. Any lawmaker that ignores the overwhelming consensus among tech experts and this level of public outcry doesn't deserve to be in office. News outlets keep asking whether net neutrality will be an election issue in 2018. We are going to make it one."
Added Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of the group, "Congress has a moral imperative to use their CRA powers to overturn the FCC's rogue action to end the basic principle of the open internet and are supported by the majority of the public. Whoever doesn't will pay at the polls."
Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) last month announced his plan to introduce a CRA to undo the FCC's "historic mistake," saying, "With this CRA, Congress can correct the commission's misguided and partisan decision and keep the internet in the hands of the people, not big corporations."
On Tuesday, he celebrated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) becoming the 29th senator to join the effort and tweeted "To @realDonaldTrump, @AjitPaiFCC and the broadband CEOs: we're not stopping until we #SaveNetNeutrality!"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.