

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) speaks while flanked by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) during a news conference after the Republican policy luncheon on Capitol Hill September 16, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
The GOP tax bill expected to hit the floor of Congress for a vote Tuesday afternoon has been characterized as legislation "written for Republicans' wealthy campaign contributors," but a report published Monday made clear that Republicans are not just attempting to fatten the already-overflowing pockets of their donors--they're also doing all they can to "feather their own nests."
According to an analysis of federal records by the International Business Times (IBT), a "special provision" buried in the 500-page Republican tax bill--which has come to be known as the #CorkerKickback--could amount to a combined $14 million annual income boost for "more than a quarter of all GOP senators."
As IBT reports:
In all, 14 Republican senators (see list below) hold financial interests in 26 income-generating real-estate partnerships--worth as much as $105 million in total. Those holdings together produced between $2.4 million and $14.1 million in rent and interest income in 2016, according to federal records.
IBT first reported on the tax carve-out, which allows investors in "pass-through" entities, including real-estate partnerships such as LLCs and LPs, with few employees to deduct part of their income that passes through those partnerships.
Along with Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), one of the wealthiest members of Congress, the other senators who stand to benefit include Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)--who admitted on Monday that he authored the provision--and Ron Johnson, who has an estimated net worth of $36 million. Some of the senators on the list also happen to be recipients of large sums of campaign cash from the real estate industry, IBT adds.
Trump--who has claimed repeatedly and falsely that the tax bill will cost him and his rich friends "a fortune"--could also see a nice profit from the last-minute addition to a bill already stuffed with corporate giveaways. As IBT notes, Trump "owns or directs over 560 companies" that will get a tax cut thanks to the real estate pass-through provision.

The discovery of the #CorkerKickback quickly sparked fury on social media, which translated into intense pressure on Corker and other Republican senators to explain how a measure that would personally enrich them ended up in the final version of their deeply unpopular bill.
In a letter on Monday, Hatch expressed "disgust" at press reports suggesting that the provision may have been included for reasons of self-interest or in an effort to win Corker's vote. But, as IBT reports, Hatch didn't deny that he stands to benefit from the measure he is helping ram through Congress, nor did he "dispute that Corker voted against the Senate bill when it restricted him from getting a personal benefit, and then switched his position and announced his support for the final bill after it included" the "Corker Kickback."
As the lead editorial in Tuesday's New York Times notes, "The tax bill's generosity toward real estate titans stands in stark contrast to its stinginess toward the average wage earner as well as its very real damage to taxpayers in high-cost states."
"Whatever the Republicans' protestations," the Times concluded, "this malodorous loophole is further confirmation that congressional leaders are doing everything they can to maximize benefits for the wealthy at the expense of almost everybody else."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The GOP tax bill expected to hit the floor of Congress for a vote Tuesday afternoon has been characterized as legislation "written for Republicans' wealthy campaign contributors," but a report published Monday made clear that Republicans are not just attempting to fatten the already-overflowing pockets of their donors--they're also doing all they can to "feather their own nests."
According to an analysis of federal records by the International Business Times (IBT), a "special provision" buried in the 500-page Republican tax bill--which has come to be known as the #CorkerKickback--could amount to a combined $14 million annual income boost for "more than a quarter of all GOP senators."
As IBT reports:
In all, 14 Republican senators (see list below) hold financial interests in 26 income-generating real-estate partnerships--worth as much as $105 million in total. Those holdings together produced between $2.4 million and $14.1 million in rent and interest income in 2016, according to federal records.
IBT first reported on the tax carve-out, which allows investors in "pass-through" entities, including real-estate partnerships such as LLCs and LPs, with few employees to deduct part of their income that passes through those partnerships.
Along with Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), one of the wealthiest members of Congress, the other senators who stand to benefit include Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)--who admitted on Monday that he authored the provision--and Ron Johnson, who has an estimated net worth of $36 million. Some of the senators on the list also happen to be recipients of large sums of campaign cash from the real estate industry, IBT adds.
Trump--who has claimed repeatedly and falsely that the tax bill will cost him and his rich friends "a fortune"--could also see a nice profit from the last-minute addition to a bill already stuffed with corporate giveaways. As IBT notes, Trump "owns or directs over 560 companies" that will get a tax cut thanks to the real estate pass-through provision.

The discovery of the #CorkerKickback quickly sparked fury on social media, which translated into intense pressure on Corker and other Republican senators to explain how a measure that would personally enrich them ended up in the final version of their deeply unpopular bill.
In a letter on Monday, Hatch expressed "disgust" at press reports suggesting that the provision may have been included for reasons of self-interest or in an effort to win Corker's vote. But, as IBT reports, Hatch didn't deny that he stands to benefit from the measure he is helping ram through Congress, nor did he "dispute that Corker voted against the Senate bill when it restricted him from getting a personal benefit, and then switched his position and announced his support for the final bill after it included" the "Corker Kickback."
As the lead editorial in Tuesday's New York Times notes, "The tax bill's generosity toward real estate titans stands in stark contrast to its stinginess toward the average wage earner as well as its very real damage to taxpayers in high-cost states."
"Whatever the Republicans' protestations," the Times concluded, "this malodorous loophole is further confirmation that congressional leaders are doing everything they can to maximize benefits for the wealthy at the expense of almost everybody else."
The GOP tax bill expected to hit the floor of Congress for a vote Tuesday afternoon has been characterized as legislation "written for Republicans' wealthy campaign contributors," but a report published Monday made clear that Republicans are not just attempting to fatten the already-overflowing pockets of their donors--they're also doing all they can to "feather their own nests."
According to an analysis of federal records by the International Business Times (IBT), a "special provision" buried in the 500-page Republican tax bill--which has come to be known as the #CorkerKickback--could amount to a combined $14 million annual income boost for "more than a quarter of all GOP senators."
As IBT reports:
In all, 14 Republican senators (see list below) hold financial interests in 26 income-generating real-estate partnerships--worth as much as $105 million in total. Those holdings together produced between $2.4 million and $14.1 million in rent and interest income in 2016, according to federal records.
IBT first reported on the tax carve-out, which allows investors in "pass-through" entities, including real-estate partnerships such as LLCs and LPs, with few employees to deduct part of their income that passes through those partnerships.
Along with Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), one of the wealthiest members of Congress, the other senators who stand to benefit include Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)--who admitted on Monday that he authored the provision--and Ron Johnson, who has an estimated net worth of $36 million. Some of the senators on the list also happen to be recipients of large sums of campaign cash from the real estate industry, IBT adds.
Trump--who has claimed repeatedly and falsely that the tax bill will cost him and his rich friends "a fortune"--could also see a nice profit from the last-minute addition to a bill already stuffed with corporate giveaways. As IBT notes, Trump "owns or directs over 560 companies" that will get a tax cut thanks to the real estate pass-through provision.

The discovery of the #CorkerKickback quickly sparked fury on social media, which translated into intense pressure on Corker and other Republican senators to explain how a measure that would personally enrich them ended up in the final version of their deeply unpopular bill.
In a letter on Monday, Hatch expressed "disgust" at press reports suggesting that the provision may have been included for reasons of self-interest or in an effort to win Corker's vote. But, as IBT reports, Hatch didn't deny that he stands to benefit from the measure he is helping ram through Congress, nor did he "dispute that Corker voted against the Senate bill when it restricted him from getting a personal benefit, and then switched his position and announced his support for the final bill after it included" the "Corker Kickback."
As the lead editorial in Tuesday's New York Times notes, "The tax bill's generosity toward real estate titans stands in stark contrast to its stinginess toward the average wage earner as well as its very real damage to taxpayers in high-cost states."
"Whatever the Republicans' protestations," the Times concluded, "this malodorous loophole is further confirmation that congressional leaders are doing everything they can to maximize benefits for the wealthy at the expense of almost everybody else."