Sen. Bob Corker (C) (R-TN), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, confers with Sen. Ron Johnson (R) (R-WI) during a committee hearing November 14, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Dec 16, 2017
Though many initially shrugged it off as just the last domino to fall in terms of ending the myth that any Republican Party lawmaker actually ever gave a whiff about the deficit, increasing evidence on Sunday reveals that Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) dropped his opposition to the GOP tax proposal after the last-minute inclusion of a provision that would directly enrich him, President Trump, and other members of Congress who hold substantial financial interests in the real estate market.
| #corkerkickback Tweets |
As David Sirota and Josh Keefe first reported for the International Business Times on Friday night:
The new tax provision would specifically allow owners of large real estate holdings through LLCs to deduct a percentage of their "pass through" income from their taxes, according to experts. Although Trump, who became famous for his real estate holdings, has transitioned into branding in recent years, federal records show Trump has ownership stakes in myriad LLCs.
The new provision was not in the bill passed by the House or the Senate. Instead, it was inserted into the final bill during reconciliation negotiations between Republicans from both chambers. The provision, said experts, would offer a special tax cut to LLCs with few employees and large amounts of depreciable property assets, namely buildings: rent generating apartment and office buildings.
Additionally, Sirota and Keefe report, "Federal records reviewed by IBT show that Corker has millions of dollars of ownership stakes in real-estate related LLCs that could also benefit."
But while Corker denied he knew anything about the provision or how it would benefit him personally, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), the majority whip in the Senate, on Sunday said its inclusion was specifically part of an effort to "cobble together the votes" needed "to get this bill passed."
Over at Vox, Emily Stewart reported that Cornyn did not have "a good answer on tax bill loophole that means millions for Corker and Trump."
On Sunday afternoon, Sirota--who filed this followup story after Cornyn's comments earlier in the day--said it looked like the social media hashtag #corkerkickback was "starting to trend"--not good news for the Republicans. "[It] doesn't matter if you love or hate the tax bill," Sirota tweeted, "this is information that needs to be out there."
If true, agreed many, the optics will not be good for Republicans as they head for a vote on the bill in the days ahead:
\u201cGOP thought this theft would go unnoticed.\n\nIt won\u2019t be if #corkerkickback starts trending. https://t.co/tq6HmQSmGL\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1513532068
\u201c#CorkerKickback exemplifies what Americans find disgusting about politicians.\n\nBy retiring @SenBobCorker freed himself from need to cater to Trump.\n\nHe promised he wouldn't vote for a deficit increase.\n\nThen traded his leverage for cold hard $$$. \n\nCorruption is shameful.\u201d— Ady Barkan (@Ady Barkan) 1513535415
\u201cSen Corker voted no on the Senate tax bill because it explodes the deficit. REVISED TAX BILL ALSO EXPLODES THE DEFICIT. But Sen Corker is now a yes vote. Is it because of the #Corkerkickback? Only other explanation is \n...\nthere really isn't any other good explanation is there? https://t.co/eQH9rSnjsY\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1513561003
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Though many initially shrugged it off as just the last domino to fall in terms of ending the myth that any Republican Party lawmaker actually ever gave a whiff about the deficit, increasing evidence on Sunday reveals that Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) dropped his opposition to the GOP tax proposal after the last-minute inclusion of a provision that would directly enrich him, President Trump, and other members of Congress who hold substantial financial interests in the real estate market.
| #corkerkickback Tweets |
As David Sirota and Josh Keefe first reported for the International Business Times on Friday night:
The new tax provision would specifically allow owners of large real estate holdings through LLCs to deduct a percentage of their "pass through" income from their taxes, according to experts. Although Trump, who became famous for his real estate holdings, has transitioned into branding in recent years, federal records show Trump has ownership stakes in myriad LLCs.
The new provision was not in the bill passed by the House or the Senate. Instead, it was inserted into the final bill during reconciliation negotiations between Republicans from both chambers. The provision, said experts, would offer a special tax cut to LLCs with few employees and large amounts of depreciable property assets, namely buildings: rent generating apartment and office buildings.
Additionally, Sirota and Keefe report, "Federal records reviewed by IBT show that Corker has millions of dollars of ownership stakes in real-estate related LLCs that could also benefit."
But while Corker denied he knew anything about the provision or how it would benefit him personally, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), the majority whip in the Senate, on Sunday said its inclusion was specifically part of an effort to "cobble together the votes" needed "to get this bill passed."
Over at Vox, Emily Stewart reported that Cornyn did not have "a good answer on tax bill loophole that means millions for Corker and Trump."
On Sunday afternoon, Sirota--who filed this followup story after Cornyn's comments earlier in the day--said it looked like the social media hashtag #corkerkickback was "starting to trend"--not good news for the Republicans. "[It] doesn't matter if you love or hate the tax bill," Sirota tweeted, "this is information that needs to be out there."
If true, agreed many, the optics will not be good for Republicans as they head for a vote on the bill in the days ahead:
\u201cGOP thought this theft would go unnoticed.\n\nIt won\u2019t be if #corkerkickback starts trending. https://t.co/tq6HmQSmGL\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1513532068
\u201c#CorkerKickback exemplifies what Americans find disgusting about politicians.\n\nBy retiring @SenBobCorker freed himself from need to cater to Trump.\n\nHe promised he wouldn't vote for a deficit increase.\n\nThen traded his leverage for cold hard $$$. \n\nCorruption is shameful.\u201d— Ady Barkan (@Ady Barkan) 1513535415
\u201cSen Corker voted no on the Senate tax bill because it explodes the deficit. REVISED TAX BILL ALSO EXPLODES THE DEFICIT. But Sen Corker is now a yes vote. Is it because of the #Corkerkickback? Only other explanation is \n...\nthere really isn't any other good explanation is there? https://t.co/eQH9rSnjsY\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1513561003
Though many initially shrugged it off as just the last domino to fall in terms of ending the myth that any Republican Party lawmaker actually ever gave a whiff about the deficit, increasing evidence on Sunday reveals that Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) dropped his opposition to the GOP tax proposal after the last-minute inclusion of a provision that would directly enrich him, President Trump, and other members of Congress who hold substantial financial interests in the real estate market.
| #corkerkickback Tweets |
As David Sirota and Josh Keefe first reported for the International Business Times on Friday night:
The new tax provision would specifically allow owners of large real estate holdings through LLCs to deduct a percentage of their "pass through" income from their taxes, according to experts. Although Trump, who became famous for his real estate holdings, has transitioned into branding in recent years, federal records show Trump has ownership stakes in myriad LLCs.
The new provision was not in the bill passed by the House or the Senate. Instead, it was inserted into the final bill during reconciliation negotiations between Republicans from both chambers. The provision, said experts, would offer a special tax cut to LLCs with few employees and large amounts of depreciable property assets, namely buildings: rent generating apartment and office buildings.
Additionally, Sirota and Keefe report, "Federal records reviewed by IBT show that Corker has millions of dollars of ownership stakes in real-estate related LLCs that could also benefit."
But while Corker denied he knew anything about the provision or how it would benefit him personally, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), the majority whip in the Senate, on Sunday said its inclusion was specifically part of an effort to "cobble together the votes" needed "to get this bill passed."
Over at Vox, Emily Stewart reported that Cornyn did not have "a good answer on tax bill loophole that means millions for Corker and Trump."
On Sunday afternoon, Sirota--who filed this followup story after Cornyn's comments earlier in the day--said it looked like the social media hashtag #corkerkickback was "starting to trend"--not good news for the Republicans. "[It] doesn't matter if you love or hate the tax bill," Sirota tweeted, "this is information that needs to be out there."
If true, agreed many, the optics will not be good for Republicans as they head for a vote on the bill in the days ahead:
\u201cGOP thought this theft would go unnoticed.\n\nIt won\u2019t be if #corkerkickback starts trending. https://t.co/tq6HmQSmGL\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1513532068
\u201c#CorkerKickback exemplifies what Americans find disgusting about politicians.\n\nBy retiring @SenBobCorker freed himself from need to cater to Trump.\n\nHe promised he wouldn't vote for a deficit increase.\n\nThen traded his leverage for cold hard $$$. \n\nCorruption is shameful.\u201d— Ady Barkan (@Ady Barkan) 1513535415
\u201cSen Corker voted no on the Senate tax bill because it explodes the deficit. REVISED TAX BILL ALSO EXPLODES THE DEFICIT. But Sen Corker is now a yes vote. Is it because of the #Corkerkickback? Only other explanation is \n...\nthere really isn't any other good explanation is there? https://t.co/eQH9rSnjsY\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1513561003
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.