Dec 15, 2017
In a "shocking and brazen" move to advance the Trump administration's "aggressive anti-worker agenda," Republicans on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) voted along party lines to overturn a rule that helped hotel and fast food workers bring labor rights lawsuits against major companies like McDonald's and other chains.
The decision restores a policy that legal experts warn lets "joint employers evade liability" and "makes it easier for a big-pocketed [corporations] to outsource parts of their operations without taking responsibility for the outsourced workers' working conditions."
\u201cA narrower definition of joint employment makes it easier for a big-pocketed corps. to outsource parts of their operations without taking responsibility for the outsourced workers' working conditions\u201d— Charlotte Garden (@Charlotte Garden) 1513287776
In 2014, labor unions and workers had celebrated a decision by the NLRB's general council that chains such as McDonald's--which primarily relies on franchise owners to handle daily operations at the vast majority of restaurants--could be treated as joint employers for the sake of settling labor disputes. While another ruling a year later expanded the joint-employer classification, McDonald's and its contemporaries have continued to fight against it.
"And once again, this administration pulls the rug out from under working people."
--Rebecca Smith, National Employment Law ProjectFollowing the vote on Thursday, "two or more entities will be deemed joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) if there is proof that one entity has exercised control over essential employment terms of another entity's employees (rather than merely having reserved the right to exercise control) and has done so directly and immediately (rather than indirectly) in a manner that is not limited and routine," according to a statement by the NLRB, which settles labor disputes between workers and employers.
Because the reversion to the old rules applies to "all future and pending cases," Thursday's ruling is expected to have significant and rather immediate consequences for workers.
As Huffington Post labor reporter Dave Jamieson noted: "Earlier this year, McDonald's was put on trial as a potential joint employer so that it might be held responsible for violating the rights of workers employed by its franchisees. That case has not been ruled on yet, and the change in precedent Thursday could knock a hole in the workers' argument."
The NLRB's decision Thursday infuriated workers, labor unions, and Democrats--including the two Democrats on the NLRB who voted against the proposal--who said this was just the latest boost to the pro-corporate agenda of President Donald Trump, a fast food enthusiast who earlier this year tried to appoint the chief executive of Hardee's and Carl's Jr.--despite a long anti-worker record--to lead the Labor Department.
"This shocking and brazen decision to overturn pro-worker precedent is further proof the Trump administration will stop at nothing to line the pockets of corporations--no matter what price workers and their families are forced to pay," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate's labor committee, told Huff Post.
Other Democrats in Congress and workers' advocates turned to Twitter to call out the Trump administration's NLRB for putting "corporate interests/wealthy donors before working families."
\u201cAGAIN with the overturning of things that are good for workers. Trump's NLRB overturns Browning-Ferris, making it harder for workers to hold the people who control their conditions of work accountable. https://t.co/ysZdz57BDS\u201d— Heidi Shierholz (@Heidi Shierholz) 1513295713
\u201cWhile working people struggle to make ends meet, Trump's NLRB is making it harder for those who hold real power in workplaces to be held accountable. https://t.co/wOaUkShCTp\u201d— Jobs With Justice (@Jobs With Justice) 1513290387
\u201cAnd once again, this Administration pulls the rug out from under working people, this time the 2.9 million in temp and staffing jobs. Score one more for the corporations at the top. https://t.co/GngRJG0bhs\u201d— Rebecca Smith (@Rebecca Smith) 1513295287
\u201cNLRB overturns BFI joint employer standard. Thank you @NLRBMcFerran and @NLRBPearce for your dissent and truth. "Today's decision represents a failure to engage in the reasoned decisionmaking required of administrative agencies by the Administrative Procedure Act".\u201d— ThatHelpfulUnionGuy (@ThatHelpfulUnionGuy) 1513351134
Although, as the New York Times noted Thursday, "the joint-employer decision was arguably the highest priority" on the NLRB's chopping block, the Republican-majority board is expected to continue attacking worker-friendly rules that were established under Obama.
In addition to the joint-employer classification, the Times reports that major employers have also targeted "rulings that made it easier for smaller groups of workers within a company to unionize, that gave workers access to a company's email network for organizing purposes, and that conferred a federally protected right to unionize on graduate students at private universities."
We're optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.
We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter counts.
Your contribution supports this new media model—free, independent, and dedicated to uncovering the truth. Stand with us in the fight for social justice, human rights, and equality. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.