U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley. (Photo: U.S. Mission Photo/Eric Bridiers/via flickr/cc)
Dec 04, 2017
In another testament of the Trump administration's anti-immigration stance, the United States announced that it is ditching negotiations towards a United Nations pact aimed at protecting the rights of refugees and migrants.
All 193 U.N. member states, including the U.S., adopted the New York Declaration in September of 2016, which included the goals of adopting a global compact on refugees and another on migration. Among the commitments laid out were protecting the human rights of all refugees and migrants and working towards ending the practice of detaining children for the purpose of determining migration status.
In a statement released Saturday announcing the decision, the United States Mission to the U.N. said the declaration "contains numerous provisions that are inconsistent with U.S. immigration and refugee policies and the Trump Administration's immigration principles." Because of this, the U.S. was walking away from participation towards the Global Compact on Migration, the statement said.
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said the declaration "is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty"--an argument echoed in a statement released Sunday by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
The decision is "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems."In response to the development, Bill Frelick, director of Human Rights Watch's refugee program, told the New York Times, "Simplistic solutions like walls will not solve the complex problem of unsafe, irregular, disorderly migration, demonstrating a callous disregard for the lives of migrants and jaw-dropping irresponsibility toward the community of nations."
The decision was also met with outrage by the Norwegian Refugee Council, which said it's "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems, and raises the specter of a possible U.S. withdrawal from the Global Compact on Refugees process."
Speaking to the U.N. a day after the declaration was adopted, then-president Barack Obama, whose administration also detained child immigrants, called the refugee crisis "a test of our common humanity--whether we give in to suspicion and fear and build walls," later adding, "I believe history will judge us harshly if we do not rise to this moment."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In another testament of the Trump administration's anti-immigration stance, the United States announced that it is ditching negotiations towards a United Nations pact aimed at protecting the rights of refugees and migrants.
All 193 U.N. member states, including the U.S., adopted the New York Declaration in September of 2016, which included the goals of adopting a global compact on refugees and another on migration. Among the commitments laid out were protecting the human rights of all refugees and migrants and working towards ending the practice of detaining children for the purpose of determining migration status.
In a statement released Saturday announcing the decision, the United States Mission to the U.N. said the declaration "contains numerous provisions that are inconsistent with U.S. immigration and refugee policies and the Trump Administration's immigration principles." Because of this, the U.S. was walking away from participation towards the Global Compact on Migration, the statement said.
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said the declaration "is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty"--an argument echoed in a statement released Sunday by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
The decision is "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems."In response to the development, Bill Frelick, director of Human Rights Watch's refugee program, told the New York Times, "Simplistic solutions like walls will not solve the complex problem of unsafe, irregular, disorderly migration, demonstrating a callous disregard for the lives of migrants and jaw-dropping irresponsibility toward the community of nations."
The decision was also met with outrage by the Norwegian Refugee Council, which said it's "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems, and raises the specter of a possible U.S. withdrawal from the Global Compact on Refugees process."
Speaking to the U.N. a day after the declaration was adopted, then-president Barack Obama, whose administration also detained child immigrants, called the refugee crisis "a test of our common humanity--whether we give in to suspicion and fear and build walls," later adding, "I believe history will judge us harshly if we do not rise to this moment."
In another testament of the Trump administration's anti-immigration stance, the United States announced that it is ditching negotiations towards a United Nations pact aimed at protecting the rights of refugees and migrants.
All 193 U.N. member states, including the U.S., adopted the New York Declaration in September of 2016, which included the goals of adopting a global compact on refugees and another on migration. Among the commitments laid out were protecting the human rights of all refugees and migrants and working towards ending the practice of detaining children for the purpose of determining migration status.
In a statement released Saturday announcing the decision, the United States Mission to the U.N. said the declaration "contains numerous provisions that are inconsistent with U.S. immigration and refugee policies and the Trump Administration's immigration principles." Because of this, the U.S. was walking away from participation towards the Global Compact on Migration, the statement said.
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said the declaration "is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty"--an argument echoed in a statement released Sunday by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
The decision is "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems."In response to the development, Bill Frelick, director of Human Rights Watch's refugee program, told the New York Times, "Simplistic solutions like walls will not solve the complex problem of unsafe, irregular, disorderly migration, demonstrating a callous disregard for the lives of migrants and jaw-dropping irresponsibility toward the community of nations."
The decision was also met with outrage by the Norwegian Refugee Council, which said it's "another example of the Trump administration's contempt for collective solutions to pressing international problems, and raises the specter of a possible U.S. withdrawal from the Global Compact on Refugees process."
Speaking to the U.N. a day after the declaration was adopted, then-president Barack Obama, whose administration also detained child immigrants, called the refugee crisis "a test of our common humanity--whether we give in to suspicion and fear and build walls," later adding, "I believe history will judge us harshly if we do not rise to this moment."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.