SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sheriff Joe Arpaio was found guilty of contempt of court in July, after he refused to stop racially profiling Latinos in Arizona. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
Trump Pardon Does Nothing To Make Sheriff Arpaio Less Guilty, Says Judge
In ruling, federal judge notes that Arpaio's acceptance of the pardon amounts to an admission of guilt
Oct 20, 2017
A federal judge refused to erase history Thursday, stating that former Sheriff Joe Arpaio is still guilty of criminal contempt of court for defying orders to stop racially profiling Latinos--despite President Donald Trump's pardon of Arpaio in August.
The pardon did not "revise the historical facts of this case," said U.S. District Judge Susan Ritchie Bolton in her ruling.
Bolton convicted Arpaio in July for violating the constitutional rights of residents in Maricopa County, Arizona after an earlier order barred him from doing so. Arpaio, a loyal Trump supporter, was notorious for detaining Latinos without any evidence of wrongdoing. He established a detention center known as Tent City where inmates were regularly humiliated and exposed to extreme temperatures, drawing condemnation from human rights groups.
Arpaio faced a maximum of six months in prison for his crimes, before Trump announced that he would pardon him, calling him "an American patriot!" on Twitter and thanking him for his "years of admirable service to our nation."
The judge noted in her ruling that a pardon "does not blot out guilt or expunge a judgment of conviction," and actually implies that Arpaio is in fact guilty.
"Indeed, a pardon 'carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it," Bolton wrote, quoting Black's Law Dictionary.
The ruling is consistent with Department of Justice guidance stating that pardoned offenses will not be removed from a pardoned individual's criminal record.
While Arpaio has attempted to have his conviction voided, four legal advocacy groups have challenged his pardon. On Monday, the groups filed a request asking Bolton to appoint a private attorney to appeal her earlier decision to let the pardon stand.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge refused to erase history Thursday, stating that former Sheriff Joe Arpaio is still guilty of criminal contempt of court for defying orders to stop racially profiling Latinos--despite President Donald Trump's pardon of Arpaio in August.
The pardon did not "revise the historical facts of this case," said U.S. District Judge Susan Ritchie Bolton in her ruling.
Bolton convicted Arpaio in July for violating the constitutional rights of residents in Maricopa County, Arizona after an earlier order barred him from doing so. Arpaio, a loyal Trump supporter, was notorious for detaining Latinos without any evidence of wrongdoing. He established a detention center known as Tent City where inmates were regularly humiliated and exposed to extreme temperatures, drawing condemnation from human rights groups.
Arpaio faced a maximum of six months in prison for his crimes, before Trump announced that he would pardon him, calling him "an American patriot!" on Twitter and thanking him for his "years of admirable service to our nation."
The judge noted in her ruling that a pardon "does not blot out guilt or expunge a judgment of conviction," and actually implies that Arpaio is in fact guilty.
"Indeed, a pardon 'carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it," Bolton wrote, quoting Black's Law Dictionary.
The ruling is consistent with Department of Justice guidance stating that pardoned offenses will not be removed from a pardoned individual's criminal record.
While Arpaio has attempted to have his conviction voided, four legal advocacy groups have challenged his pardon. On Monday, the groups filed a request asking Bolton to appoint a private attorney to appeal her earlier decision to let the pardon stand.
A federal judge refused to erase history Thursday, stating that former Sheriff Joe Arpaio is still guilty of criminal contempt of court for defying orders to stop racially profiling Latinos--despite President Donald Trump's pardon of Arpaio in August.
The pardon did not "revise the historical facts of this case," said U.S. District Judge Susan Ritchie Bolton in her ruling.
Bolton convicted Arpaio in July for violating the constitutional rights of residents in Maricopa County, Arizona after an earlier order barred him from doing so. Arpaio, a loyal Trump supporter, was notorious for detaining Latinos without any evidence of wrongdoing. He established a detention center known as Tent City where inmates were regularly humiliated and exposed to extreme temperatures, drawing condemnation from human rights groups.
Arpaio faced a maximum of six months in prison for his crimes, before Trump announced that he would pardon him, calling him "an American patriot!" on Twitter and thanking him for his "years of admirable service to our nation."
The judge noted in her ruling that a pardon "does not blot out guilt or expunge a judgment of conviction," and actually implies that Arpaio is in fact guilty.
"Indeed, a pardon 'carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it," Bolton wrote, quoting Black's Law Dictionary.
The ruling is consistent with Department of Justice guidance stating that pardoned offenses will not be removed from a pardoned individual's criminal record.
While Arpaio has attempted to have his conviction voided, four legal advocacy groups have challenged his pardon. On Monday, the groups filed a request asking Bolton to appoint a private attorney to appeal her earlier decision to let the pardon stand.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy