The communities along Texas's Gulf Coast were devasted by Hurricane Harvey in August 2017. (Photo: National Museum of the U.S. Navy/Flickr/cc)
Oct 20, 2017
Civil liberties advocates are denouncing a decision by a Texas city to require applicants for Hurricane Harvey rebuilding funds to sign a statement certifying that they are not currently boycotting Israel, and will not participate future protests.
\u201cThe city of Dickinson, Texas is requiring people applying for Hurricane Harvey aid to promise not to boycott Israel. This is unconstitutional.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1508450640
Although the hurricane devastated the entire Houston metro area with record rainfall and destructive flooding, a local television news station reported in early September that "damage in Dickinson may be the worst of Harvey," with more than 7,000 homes and 88 businesses "significantly damaged."
The city of Dickinson, located southeast of Houston, recently posted to its website an application for hurricane repair grants from donations made toward rebuilding efforts.
However, individuals and businesses submitting applications (pdf) for the funding must sign a contract affirming that "the applicant: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this agreement."
\u201cOUTRAGEOUS - a condition of hurricane relief in Dickinson, TX requires that you agree not to Boycott Israel. #BDS https://t.co/Mdybmc9rTH\u201d— Jewish Voice for Peace (@Jewish Voice for Peace) 1508444678
Dickinson's attorney reportedly told a local television station that the city is merely enforcing a Texas law, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott in May, that "prohibits all state agencies from contracting with, and certain public funds from investing in, companies that boycott Israel," according to the governor's website.
Critics, including the ACLU, are condemning not only the city's requirement but also Texas's anti-protest law--and similiar measures enacted across the U.S. and under consideration in Congress--as violations of constitutional free speech rights.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey."
--Brian Hauss, ACLU
"Dickinson's requirement is an egregious violation of the First Amendment, reminiscent of McCarthy-era loyalty oaths requiring Americans to disavow membership in the Communist party and other forms of 'subversive' activity," said ACLU of Texas legal director Andre Segura.
"The First Amendment protects Americans' right to boycott," Segura added, "and the government cannot condition hurricane relief or any other public benefit on a commitment to refrain from protected political expression."
Last week, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Kansas law that similarly bars state contractors from participating in protests of Israel.
"These bills and laws vary in numerous respects," ACLU attorney Brian Hauss wrote recently for Haaretz, "but they share a common goal of scaring people away people from participating in boycotts meant to protest Israeli government policies, including what are known as Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign."
"Like the law we challenged in Kansas, Texas's law clearly violates the First Amendment," Hauss toldThe Intercept.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey," he added. "The government should not be denying disaster relief funds based on people's political beliefs."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Civil liberties advocates are denouncing a decision by a Texas city to require applicants for Hurricane Harvey rebuilding funds to sign a statement certifying that they are not currently boycotting Israel, and will not participate future protests.
\u201cThe city of Dickinson, Texas is requiring people applying for Hurricane Harvey aid to promise not to boycott Israel. This is unconstitutional.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1508450640
Although the hurricane devastated the entire Houston metro area with record rainfall and destructive flooding, a local television news station reported in early September that "damage in Dickinson may be the worst of Harvey," with more than 7,000 homes and 88 businesses "significantly damaged."
The city of Dickinson, located southeast of Houston, recently posted to its website an application for hurricane repair grants from donations made toward rebuilding efforts.
However, individuals and businesses submitting applications (pdf) for the funding must sign a contract affirming that "the applicant: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this agreement."
\u201cOUTRAGEOUS - a condition of hurricane relief in Dickinson, TX requires that you agree not to Boycott Israel. #BDS https://t.co/Mdybmc9rTH\u201d— Jewish Voice for Peace (@Jewish Voice for Peace) 1508444678
Dickinson's attorney reportedly told a local television station that the city is merely enforcing a Texas law, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott in May, that "prohibits all state agencies from contracting with, and certain public funds from investing in, companies that boycott Israel," according to the governor's website.
Critics, including the ACLU, are condemning not only the city's requirement but also Texas's anti-protest law--and similiar measures enacted across the U.S. and under consideration in Congress--as violations of constitutional free speech rights.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey."
--Brian Hauss, ACLU
"Dickinson's requirement is an egregious violation of the First Amendment, reminiscent of McCarthy-era loyalty oaths requiring Americans to disavow membership in the Communist party and other forms of 'subversive' activity," said ACLU of Texas legal director Andre Segura.
"The First Amendment protects Americans' right to boycott," Segura added, "and the government cannot condition hurricane relief or any other public benefit on a commitment to refrain from protected political expression."
Last week, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Kansas law that similarly bars state contractors from participating in protests of Israel.
"These bills and laws vary in numerous respects," ACLU attorney Brian Hauss wrote recently for Haaretz, "but they share a common goal of scaring people away people from participating in boycotts meant to protest Israeli government policies, including what are known as Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign."
"Like the law we challenged in Kansas, Texas's law clearly violates the First Amendment," Hauss toldThe Intercept.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey," he added. "The government should not be denying disaster relief funds based on people's political beliefs."
Civil liberties advocates are denouncing a decision by a Texas city to require applicants for Hurricane Harvey rebuilding funds to sign a statement certifying that they are not currently boycotting Israel, and will not participate future protests.
\u201cThe city of Dickinson, Texas is requiring people applying for Hurricane Harvey aid to promise not to boycott Israel. This is unconstitutional.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1508450640
Although the hurricane devastated the entire Houston metro area with record rainfall and destructive flooding, a local television news station reported in early September that "damage in Dickinson may be the worst of Harvey," with more than 7,000 homes and 88 businesses "significantly damaged."
The city of Dickinson, located southeast of Houston, recently posted to its website an application for hurricane repair grants from donations made toward rebuilding efforts.
However, individuals and businesses submitting applications (pdf) for the funding must sign a contract affirming that "the applicant: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this agreement."
\u201cOUTRAGEOUS - a condition of hurricane relief in Dickinson, TX requires that you agree not to Boycott Israel. #BDS https://t.co/Mdybmc9rTH\u201d— Jewish Voice for Peace (@Jewish Voice for Peace) 1508444678
Dickinson's attorney reportedly told a local television station that the city is merely enforcing a Texas law, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott in May, that "prohibits all state agencies from contracting with, and certain public funds from investing in, companies that boycott Israel," according to the governor's website.
Critics, including the ACLU, are condemning not only the city's requirement but also Texas's anti-protest law--and similiar measures enacted across the U.S. and under consideration in Congress--as violations of constitutional free speech rights.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey."
--Brian Hauss, ACLU
"Dickinson's requirement is an egregious violation of the First Amendment, reminiscent of McCarthy-era loyalty oaths requiring Americans to disavow membership in the Communist party and other forms of 'subversive' activity," said ACLU of Texas legal director Andre Segura.
"The First Amendment protects Americans' right to boycott," Segura added, "and the government cannot condition hurricane relief or any other public benefit on a commitment to refrain from protected political expression."
Last week, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Kansas law that similarly bars state contractors from participating in protests of Israel.
"These bills and laws vary in numerous respects," ACLU attorney Brian Hauss wrote recently for Haaretz, "but they share a common goal of scaring people away people from participating in boycotts meant to protest Israeli government policies, including what are known as Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign."
"Like the law we challenged in Kansas, Texas's law clearly violates the First Amendment," Hauss toldThe Intercept.
"It is absolutely unconscionable for state and local governments to impose political litmus tests on disaster relief funds for people devastated by Hurricane Harvey," he added. "The government should not be denying disaster relief funds based on people's political beliefs."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.