More than 300 people were killed in deadliest single attack in Somalia's history on Saturday. (Photo: AP)
Oct 17, 2017
Days after more than 300 people were killed in Somalia after a massive truck bomb went off in the capital city of Mogadishu on Saturday, many are citing a double-standard when it comes to the kind of coverage such attacks receive compared to similar kinds of violence elsewhere in the world.
A news item in Al-Jazeera on Tueasday noted that while the "attack in Somalia came little more than one week after a deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas" there was concern about the "quieter response" online and in media reports about the carnage in Mogadishu:
"We mourn with Somalia. 276 dead. 300 hurt. We confess that our tears are often limited to the West. Forgive us. We long for peace with you," said Eugene Cho.
"You should be as devastated about the sheer loss of life in Somalia, as you were about the senseless killings in Vegas," wrote Stacey Dooley, a British television presenter.
Itayi Viriri, spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, who questioned why the Somalia attack did not make a larger impact on social media sites or with high-profile users, such as politicians or celebrities, who often tweet their support and condolences for victims.
\u201cWhy aren\u2019t we all with Somalia today? @Facebook? @Twitter? #Celebs? Anyone?\u201d— Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea (@Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea) 1508131257
Though the difference in western news coverage was obvious, there were also sincere and heartfelt messages of support for the people of Somalia from progressive voices:
\u201cWe hold in the light all those who were affected by the attack in #Somalia. https://t.co/G1rLTh59X4\u201d— FCNL (Quakers) (@FCNL (Quakers)) 1508255951
\u201cThe Eiffel Tower went dark to pay tribute to the victims of the car bombings in Mogadishu, Somalia https://t.co/6CK03yzzzG\u201d— CNN International (@CNN International) 1508233734
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Days after more than 300 people were killed in Somalia after a massive truck bomb went off in the capital city of Mogadishu on Saturday, many are citing a double-standard when it comes to the kind of coverage such attacks receive compared to similar kinds of violence elsewhere in the world.
A news item in Al-Jazeera on Tueasday noted that while the "attack in Somalia came little more than one week after a deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas" there was concern about the "quieter response" online and in media reports about the carnage in Mogadishu:
"We mourn with Somalia. 276 dead. 300 hurt. We confess that our tears are often limited to the West. Forgive us. We long for peace with you," said Eugene Cho.
"You should be as devastated about the sheer loss of life in Somalia, as you were about the senseless killings in Vegas," wrote Stacey Dooley, a British television presenter.
Itayi Viriri, spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, who questioned why the Somalia attack did not make a larger impact on social media sites or with high-profile users, such as politicians or celebrities, who often tweet their support and condolences for victims.
\u201cWhy aren\u2019t we all with Somalia today? @Facebook? @Twitter? #Celebs? Anyone?\u201d— Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea (@Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea) 1508131257
Though the difference in western news coverage was obvious, there were also sincere and heartfelt messages of support for the people of Somalia from progressive voices:
\u201cWe hold in the light all those who were affected by the attack in #Somalia. https://t.co/G1rLTh59X4\u201d— FCNL (Quakers) (@FCNL (Quakers)) 1508255951
\u201cThe Eiffel Tower went dark to pay tribute to the victims of the car bombings in Mogadishu, Somalia https://t.co/6CK03yzzzG\u201d— CNN International (@CNN International) 1508233734
Days after more than 300 people were killed in Somalia after a massive truck bomb went off in the capital city of Mogadishu on Saturday, many are citing a double-standard when it comes to the kind of coverage such attacks receive compared to similar kinds of violence elsewhere in the world.
A news item in Al-Jazeera on Tueasday noted that while the "attack in Somalia came little more than one week after a deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas" there was concern about the "quieter response" online and in media reports about the carnage in Mogadishu:
"We mourn with Somalia. 276 dead. 300 hurt. We confess that our tears are often limited to the West. Forgive us. We long for peace with you," said Eugene Cho.
"You should be as devastated about the sheer loss of life in Somalia, as you were about the senseless killings in Vegas," wrote Stacey Dooley, a British television presenter.
Itayi Viriri, spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, who questioned why the Somalia attack did not make a larger impact on social media sites or with high-profile users, such as politicians or celebrities, who often tweet their support and condolences for victims.
\u201cWhy aren\u2019t we all with Somalia today? @Facebook? @Twitter? #Celebs? Anyone?\u201d— Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea (@Itayi Viriri \ud83c\uddff\ud83c\uddfc \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddea) 1508131257
Though the difference in western news coverage was obvious, there were also sincere and heartfelt messages of support for the people of Somalia from progressive voices:
\u201cWe hold in the light all those who were affected by the attack in #Somalia. https://t.co/G1rLTh59X4\u201d— FCNL (Quakers) (@FCNL (Quakers)) 1508255951
\u201cThe Eiffel Tower went dark to pay tribute to the victims of the car bombings in Mogadishu, Somalia https://t.co/6CK03yzzzG\u201d— CNN International (@CNN International) 1508233734
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.