SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A sign held at the March for Science in San Francisco, California, on April 22, 2017. (Photo: Matthew Roth/flickr/cc)
President Donald Trump's newly-announced nominee to head the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is an elected official with no science credentials.
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Oklahoma), who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, is "unlike previous NASA administrators," Newsweek notes, as "the 42-year-old Michigan native does not have any formal qualifications in science or engineering, having earned a triple bachelor's degree in economics, psychology, and business from Rice University, and later an MBA from Cornell University."
"Some might say that the government has seemed increasingly reluctant to leave science to the scientists," writes CNET's Chris Matyszczyk.
The former Navy Reserve pilot also served as executive director of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum before being elected to Congress in 2012.
"NASA scientists have led the way in documenting the scientific reality of climate change," writes ThinkProgress' Joe Romm.
But in 2013, Bridenstine not only gave a speech on the House floor filled with standard denier talking points, he actually ended his remarks with a demand that President Obama apologize for funding research into climate science.
"Mr. Speaker, global temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago," he falsely claimed.
ArsTechnica reported last month that Bridenstine "was championed by several commercial space companies because he is open to increased privatization of U.S. civil and military space activities."
The pick also drew criticism from Florida Sens. Marco Rubio (R) and Bill Nelson (D). Rubio mentioned concerns over his "political baggage," while Nelson told Politico that the "head of NASA ought to be a space professional, not a politician."
Reacting to the nomination, Bill McKibben tweeted that Bridenstine "seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work."
\u201cUm, Trump's nominee to head NASA seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work https://t.co/yCLF9k34Ta\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1504371064
According to the Rogue NASA Twitter account, Bridenstine "fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster," adding, "The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us."
\u201cTo be fair, @RepJBridenstine fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster. Be strong #NASA. #Resist\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504398799
\u201c. @RepJBridenstine doesn\u2019t deserve #NASA. NASA is about science, not politics. The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us. \ud83d\ude21 https://t.co/axBm141CnR\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504428499
The White House statement Friday also announced the nomination of Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.) to be director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, a position often referred to as drug czar.
He "was one of Trump's most enthusiastic supporters" during his presidential campaign, LancasterOnline notes.
His "congressional voting record," the Washington Post previously reported, "is that of a hard-liner on marijuana issues, and he recently said that he'd like to put nonviolent drug offenders in some sort of 'hospital-slash-prison.'"
When his name was first floated in April, Bill Piper, senior director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, called Marino "a disastrous choice" who "needs to be opposed."
The nominees still need Senate confirmation.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Donald Trump's newly-announced nominee to head the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is an elected official with no science credentials.
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Oklahoma), who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, is "unlike previous NASA administrators," Newsweek notes, as "the 42-year-old Michigan native does not have any formal qualifications in science or engineering, having earned a triple bachelor's degree in economics, psychology, and business from Rice University, and later an MBA from Cornell University."
"Some might say that the government has seemed increasingly reluctant to leave science to the scientists," writes CNET's Chris Matyszczyk.
The former Navy Reserve pilot also served as executive director of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum before being elected to Congress in 2012.
"NASA scientists have led the way in documenting the scientific reality of climate change," writes ThinkProgress' Joe Romm.
But in 2013, Bridenstine not only gave a speech on the House floor filled with standard denier talking points, he actually ended his remarks with a demand that President Obama apologize for funding research into climate science.
"Mr. Speaker, global temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago," he falsely claimed.
ArsTechnica reported last month that Bridenstine "was championed by several commercial space companies because he is open to increased privatization of U.S. civil and military space activities."
The pick also drew criticism from Florida Sens. Marco Rubio (R) and Bill Nelson (D). Rubio mentioned concerns over his "political baggage," while Nelson told Politico that the "head of NASA ought to be a space professional, not a politician."
Reacting to the nomination, Bill McKibben tweeted that Bridenstine "seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work."
\u201cUm, Trump's nominee to head NASA seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work https://t.co/yCLF9k34Ta\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1504371064
According to the Rogue NASA Twitter account, Bridenstine "fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster," adding, "The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us."
\u201cTo be fair, @RepJBridenstine fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster. Be strong #NASA. #Resist\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504398799
\u201c. @RepJBridenstine doesn\u2019t deserve #NASA. NASA is about science, not politics. The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us. \ud83d\ude21 https://t.co/axBm141CnR\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504428499
The White House statement Friday also announced the nomination of Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.) to be director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, a position often referred to as drug czar.
He "was one of Trump's most enthusiastic supporters" during his presidential campaign, LancasterOnline notes.
His "congressional voting record," the Washington Post previously reported, "is that of a hard-liner on marijuana issues, and he recently said that he'd like to put nonviolent drug offenders in some sort of 'hospital-slash-prison.'"
When his name was first floated in April, Bill Piper, senior director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, called Marino "a disastrous choice" who "needs to be opposed."
The nominees still need Senate confirmation.
President Donald Trump's newly-announced nominee to head the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is an elected official with no science credentials.
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Oklahoma), who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, is "unlike previous NASA administrators," Newsweek notes, as "the 42-year-old Michigan native does not have any formal qualifications in science or engineering, having earned a triple bachelor's degree in economics, psychology, and business from Rice University, and later an MBA from Cornell University."
"Some might say that the government has seemed increasingly reluctant to leave science to the scientists," writes CNET's Chris Matyszczyk.
The former Navy Reserve pilot also served as executive director of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum before being elected to Congress in 2012.
"NASA scientists have led the way in documenting the scientific reality of climate change," writes ThinkProgress' Joe Romm.
But in 2013, Bridenstine not only gave a speech on the House floor filled with standard denier talking points, he actually ended his remarks with a demand that President Obama apologize for funding research into climate science.
"Mr. Speaker, global temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago," he falsely claimed.
ArsTechnica reported last month that Bridenstine "was championed by several commercial space companies because he is open to increased privatization of U.S. civil and military space activities."
The pick also drew criticism from Florida Sens. Marco Rubio (R) and Bill Nelson (D). Rubio mentioned concerns over his "political baggage," while Nelson told Politico that the "head of NASA ought to be a space professional, not a politician."
Reacting to the nomination, Bill McKibben tweeted that Bridenstine "seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work."
\u201cUm, Trump's nominee to head NASA seems a tad murky on the topic of how planets work https://t.co/yCLF9k34Ta\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1504371064
According to the Rogue NASA Twitter account, Bridenstine "fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster," adding, "The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us."
\u201cTo be fair, @RepJBridenstine fits the perfect mold of a Trump appointee. No experience and a complete disaster. Be strong #NASA. #Resist\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504398799
\u201c. @RepJBridenstine doesn\u2019t deserve #NASA. NASA is about science, not politics. The fact that he is on the table is an insult to all of us. \ud83d\ude21 https://t.co/axBm141CnR\u201d— Rogue NASA (@Rogue NASA) 1504428499
The White House statement Friday also announced the nomination of Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.) to be director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, a position often referred to as drug czar.
He "was one of Trump's most enthusiastic supporters" during his presidential campaign, LancasterOnline notes.
His "congressional voting record," the Washington Post previously reported, "is that of a hard-liner on marijuana issues, and he recently said that he'd like to put nonviolent drug offenders in some sort of 'hospital-slash-prison.'"
When his name was first floated in April, Bill Piper, senior director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, called Marino "a disastrous choice" who "needs to be opposed."
The nominees still need Senate confirmation.