Aug 22, 2017
The sitting generals like it. The retired generals who dominate corporate news shows appear to like it. The Beltway Establishment is impressed. Democrats like Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia want "more details." The neoconservatives really like it. And the weapons manufacturers are liking it all the way to the bank.
But on Tuesday, in the wake of President Donald Trump's newly announced strategy for the U.S. war in Afghanistan, British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said the new plan would only continue the "failure" of American policy in South Asia and called on Prime Minister Theresa May not to "obediently applaud" her approval nor jump on board to join in the folly.
\u201cAfter 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home https://t.co/feJZlK3foH\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1503421212
"The war in Afghanistan has failed," Corbyn told the Mirror. "After 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home. In fact it has spread. The British Government should make clear to Donald Trump that his strategy of more bombing and a new troop surge will continue this failure, not obediently applaud his latest policy U-turn."
While the U.S. certainly has outspoken critics of the war--some of them in Congress and many of them consistent in their opposition--few prominent politicians, journalists, or political observers have been willing to decry the nation's longest war as the misadventure it is.
According to the Guardian, the UK government has no current plans to increase its troops levels in Afghanistan even as the Associated Pressreported Tuesday afternoon that Trump's plan will call for approximately 3,900 troops, some of which could arrive in the country "within days."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The sitting generals like it. The retired generals who dominate corporate news shows appear to like it. The Beltway Establishment is impressed. Democrats like Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia want "more details." The neoconservatives really like it. And the weapons manufacturers are liking it all the way to the bank.
But on Tuesday, in the wake of President Donald Trump's newly announced strategy for the U.S. war in Afghanistan, British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said the new plan would only continue the "failure" of American policy in South Asia and called on Prime Minister Theresa May not to "obediently applaud" her approval nor jump on board to join in the folly.
\u201cAfter 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home https://t.co/feJZlK3foH\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1503421212
"The war in Afghanistan has failed," Corbyn told the Mirror. "After 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home. In fact it has spread. The British Government should make clear to Donald Trump that his strategy of more bombing and a new troop surge will continue this failure, not obediently applaud his latest policy U-turn."
While the U.S. certainly has outspoken critics of the war--some of them in Congress and many of them consistent in their opposition--few prominent politicians, journalists, or political observers have been willing to decry the nation's longest war as the misadventure it is.
According to the Guardian, the UK government has no current plans to increase its troops levels in Afghanistan even as the Associated Pressreported Tuesday afternoon that Trump's plan will call for approximately 3,900 troops, some of which could arrive in the country "within days."
The sitting generals like it. The retired generals who dominate corporate news shows appear to like it. The Beltway Establishment is impressed. Democrats like Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia want "more details." The neoconservatives really like it. And the weapons manufacturers are liking it all the way to the bank.
But on Tuesday, in the wake of President Donald Trump's newly announced strategy for the U.S. war in Afghanistan, British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said the new plan would only continue the "failure" of American policy in South Asia and called on Prime Minister Theresa May not to "obediently applaud" her approval nor jump on board to join in the folly.
\u201cAfter 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home https://t.co/feJZlK3foH\u201d— Jeremy Corbyn (@Jeremy Corbyn) 1503421212
"The war in Afghanistan has failed," Corbyn told the Mirror. "After 16 years of bloodshed and destruction, the Taliban are undefeated and terrorism is no less of a threat at home. In fact it has spread. The British Government should make clear to Donald Trump that his strategy of more bombing and a new troop surge will continue this failure, not obediently applaud his latest policy U-turn."
While the U.S. certainly has outspoken critics of the war--some of them in Congress and many of them consistent in their opposition--few prominent politicians, journalists, or political observers have been willing to decry the nation's longest war as the misadventure it is.
According to the Guardian, the UK government has no current plans to increase its troops levels in Afghanistan even as the Associated Pressreported Tuesday afternoon that Trump's plan will call for approximately 3,900 troops, some of which could arrive in the country "within days."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.