Jul 28, 2017
Attorneys general from 18 states and Washington, D.C. are the latest group to push back against President Donald Trump's proposal to bar transgender Americans from serving in the military.
As the Senate prepares to take up its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the attorneys general from states in every region of the continental U.S. sent a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Friday, asking it to protect transgender people from discrimination by the military as it drafts the bill.
A letter was also sent to the House Armed Services Committee, though the House passed its version of the bill earlier this week.
The letter was written in response to a plan introduced by Trump via Twitter on Wednesday, in which he wrote that "the United States government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military," citing "tremendous costs and disruption."
The attorneys general wrote that the proposal "has no place in our Armed Services. It is an insult to the courageous transgender service members who hold vital roles in our military and continue to make tremendous sacrifices for our country...It is inconsistent with the laws and policies of many States, and with fundamental notions of fairness and equality."
The letter noted that Trump's directive reversed course on "a closed issue." Transgender service members have been allowed to serve openly in the military for the past year, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis said he would not reverse the transgender policy during his confirmation hearing in January.
As noted in the letter, the Joint Chiefs of Staff also disagreed with Trump's decision, and on Thursday Chairman Joseph Dunford said the Pentagon would not take action to discharge any transgender service members based on the president's tweet.
The attorneys general also pushed back against Trump's claim that allowing transgender Americans to serve creates a financial burden for the military:
Based on the best independent estimates available from the RAND Corporation and the New England Journal of Medicine, the cost of medical care for transgender troops is negligible. Moreover, a Defense Department study concluded that transgender service members do not harm unit cohesion and that allowing transgender troops to fulfill their duty has no effect on military readiness or military budgets.
The RAND Corporation study cited in the letter found "only a 0.13-percent ($8.4 million out of $6.2 billion) increase in health care spending" for transgender troops' medical needs." According to a report by the Military Times, the military spends $84 million per year on medications for erectile dysfunction--10 times the cost of medical care for transgender service members.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Attorneys general from 18 states and Washington, D.C. are the latest group to push back against President Donald Trump's proposal to bar transgender Americans from serving in the military.
As the Senate prepares to take up its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the attorneys general from states in every region of the continental U.S. sent a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Friday, asking it to protect transgender people from discrimination by the military as it drafts the bill.
A letter was also sent to the House Armed Services Committee, though the House passed its version of the bill earlier this week.
The letter was written in response to a plan introduced by Trump via Twitter on Wednesday, in which he wrote that "the United States government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military," citing "tremendous costs and disruption."
The attorneys general wrote that the proposal "has no place in our Armed Services. It is an insult to the courageous transgender service members who hold vital roles in our military and continue to make tremendous sacrifices for our country...It is inconsistent with the laws and policies of many States, and with fundamental notions of fairness and equality."
The letter noted that Trump's directive reversed course on "a closed issue." Transgender service members have been allowed to serve openly in the military for the past year, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis said he would not reverse the transgender policy during his confirmation hearing in January.
As noted in the letter, the Joint Chiefs of Staff also disagreed with Trump's decision, and on Thursday Chairman Joseph Dunford said the Pentagon would not take action to discharge any transgender service members based on the president's tweet.
The attorneys general also pushed back against Trump's claim that allowing transgender Americans to serve creates a financial burden for the military:
Based on the best independent estimates available from the RAND Corporation and the New England Journal of Medicine, the cost of medical care for transgender troops is negligible. Moreover, a Defense Department study concluded that transgender service members do not harm unit cohesion and that allowing transgender troops to fulfill their duty has no effect on military readiness or military budgets.
The RAND Corporation study cited in the letter found "only a 0.13-percent ($8.4 million out of $6.2 billion) increase in health care spending" for transgender troops' medical needs." According to a report by the Military Times, the military spends $84 million per year on medications for erectile dysfunction--10 times the cost of medical care for transgender service members.
Attorneys general from 18 states and Washington, D.C. are the latest group to push back against President Donald Trump's proposal to bar transgender Americans from serving in the military.
As the Senate prepares to take up its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the attorneys general from states in every region of the continental U.S. sent a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Friday, asking it to protect transgender people from discrimination by the military as it drafts the bill.
A letter was also sent to the House Armed Services Committee, though the House passed its version of the bill earlier this week.
The letter was written in response to a plan introduced by Trump via Twitter on Wednesday, in which he wrote that "the United States government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military," citing "tremendous costs and disruption."
The attorneys general wrote that the proposal "has no place in our Armed Services. It is an insult to the courageous transgender service members who hold vital roles in our military and continue to make tremendous sacrifices for our country...It is inconsistent with the laws and policies of many States, and with fundamental notions of fairness and equality."
The letter noted that Trump's directive reversed course on "a closed issue." Transgender service members have been allowed to serve openly in the military for the past year, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis said he would not reverse the transgender policy during his confirmation hearing in January.
As noted in the letter, the Joint Chiefs of Staff also disagreed with Trump's decision, and on Thursday Chairman Joseph Dunford said the Pentagon would not take action to discharge any transgender service members based on the president's tweet.
The attorneys general also pushed back against Trump's claim that allowing transgender Americans to serve creates a financial burden for the military:
Based on the best independent estimates available from the RAND Corporation and the New England Journal of Medicine, the cost of medical care for transgender troops is negligible. Moreover, a Defense Department study concluded that transgender service members do not harm unit cohesion and that allowing transgender troops to fulfill their duty has no effect on military readiness or military budgets.
The RAND Corporation study cited in the letter found "only a 0.13-percent ($8.4 million out of $6.2 billion) increase in health care spending" for transgender troops' medical needs." According to a report by the Military Times, the military spends $84 million per year on medications for erectile dysfunction--10 times the cost of medical care for transgender service members.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.