SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Donald Trump Jr. is under fire after releasing emails from June 2016, in which he arranged to meet with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin. (Photo: John Moore/Getty)
'No Longer A Question': Trump Jr.'s Emails Show Collusion, Analysts Say
Officials call for president's son to testify on his meeting with Russian lawyer
Jul 11, 2017
Analysts, journalists and officials expressed shock Tuesday following the release of Donald Trump Jr.'s emails regarding a meeting with a Russian lawyer who had Kremlin ties.
Trump Jr. posted his June 2016 email exchange with Ron Goldstone, a contact who offered to arrange a meeting in which then-Presidential candidate Donald Trump's son believed he would learn damaging information about his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
In the wake of the explosive revelations, Paul S. Ryan of the nonpartisan advocacy group Common Cause said, "Whether or not he actually received that information does not matter in the eyes of the law. Trump's solicitation of the information is what constitutes the violation."
While opposition research by political campaigns is certainly not unusual, a member of a presidential candidate's team gathering information about an opponent from any foreign national, especially someone connected with a foreign government, would be a violation of campaign laws. Michael Luo of The New Yorker tweeted an excerpt of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
"It is shocking," said Ryan, "that Donald Trump Jr. did not immediately contact federal authorities when he was offered information, supposedly from the Russian government, intended to undermine the 2016 election. Donald Trump Jr. clearly chose to put his father's campaign before his country and that is deeply troubling."
In The Hill, legal scholar Jonathan Turley argued that Trump Jr.'s emails exhibit incompetence more than they do collusion.
"If the Russians were making such a play to influence the election in favor of Trump, this is a curious way of going about it. The most obvious question is why the Russians would call such a meeting but not actually produce any evidence or even substantive allegations. One obvious explanation is that Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort fell for a classic bait-and-switch."
The former U.S. ambassador to Russia under Barack Obama, as well as Obama's special counsel for ethics, weighed in on Twitter.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee which is investigating the Trump administration's ties to Russia, said that the time for debate over whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, has officially past.
Other lawmakers including Sen. Charles Schumer is calling for Trump Jr. to testify before the committee. But the president's son has only confirmed one upcoming appearance: Tuesday evening on Fox News, where he'll discuss his June 2016 meeting with conservative host Sean Hannity.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Analysts, journalists and officials expressed shock Tuesday following the release of Donald Trump Jr.'s emails regarding a meeting with a Russian lawyer who had Kremlin ties.
Trump Jr. posted his June 2016 email exchange with Ron Goldstone, a contact who offered to arrange a meeting in which then-Presidential candidate Donald Trump's son believed he would learn damaging information about his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
In the wake of the explosive revelations, Paul S. Ryan of the nonpartisan advocacy group Common Cause said, "Whether or not he actually received that information does not matter in the eyes of the law. Trump's solicitation of the information is what constitutes the violation."
While opposition research by political campaigns is certainly not unusual, a member of a presidential candidate's team gathering information about an opponent from any foreign national, especially someone connected with a foreign government, would be a violation of campaign laws. Michael Luo of The New Yorker tweeted an excerpt of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
"It is shocking," said Ryan, "that Donald Trump Jr. did not immediately contact federal authorities when he was offered information, supposedly from the Russian government, intended to undermine the 2016 election. Donald Trump Jr. clearly chose to put his father's campaign before his country and that is deeply troubling."
In The Hill, legal scholar Jonathan Turley argued that Trump Jr.'s emails exhibit incompetence more than they do collusion.
"If the Russians were making such a play to influence the election in favor of Trump, this is a curious way of going about it. The most obvious question is why the Russians would call such a meeting but not actually produce any evidence or even substantive allegations. One obvious explanation is that Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort fell for a classic bait-and-switch."
The former U.S. ambassador to Russia under Barack Obama, as well as Obama's special counsel for ethics, weighed in on Twitter.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee which is investigating the Trump administration's ties to Russia, said that the time for debate over whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, has officially past.
Other lawmakers including Sen. Charles Schumer is calling for Trump Jr. to testify before the committee. But the president's son has only confirmed one upcoming appearance: Tuesday evening on Fox News, where he'll discuss his June 2016 meeting with conservative host Sean Hannity.
Analysts, journalists and officials expressed shock Tuesday following the release of Donald Trump Jr.'s emails regarding a meeting with a Russian lawyer who had Kremlin ties.
Trump Jr. posted his June 2016 email exchange with Ron Goldstone, a contact who offered to arrange a meeting in which then-Presidential candidate Donald Trump's son believed he would learn damaging information about his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
In the wake of the explosive revelations, Paul S. Ryan of the nonpartisan advocacy group Common Cause said, "Whether or not he actually received that information does not matter in the eyes of the law. Trump's solicitation of the information is what constitutes the violation."
While opposition research by political campaigns is certainly not unusual, a member of a presidential candidate's team gathering information about an opponent from any foreign national, especially someone connected with a foreign government, would be a violation of campaign laws. Michael Luo of The New Yorker tweeted an excerpt of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
"It is shocking," said Ryan, "that Donald Trump Jr. did not immediately contact federal authorities when he was offered information, supposedly from the Russian government, intended to undermine the 2016 election. Donald Trump Jr. clearly chose to put his father's campaign before his country and that is deeply troubling."
In The Hill, legal scholar Jonathan Turley argued that Trump Jr.'s emails exhibit incompetence more than they do collusion.
"If the Russians were making such a play to influence the election in favor of Trump, this is a curious way of going about it. The most obvious question is why the Russians would call such a meeting but not actually produce any evidence or even substantive allegations. One obvious explanation is that Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort fell for a classic bait-and-switch."
The former U.S. ambassador to Russia under Barack Obama, as well as Obama's special counsel for ethics, weighed in on Twitter.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee which is investigating the Trump administration's ties to Russia, said that the time for debate over whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, has officially past.
Other lawmakers including Sen. Charles Schumer is calling for Trump Jr. to testify before the committee. But the president's son has only confirmed one upcoming appearance: Tuesday evening on Fox News, where he'll discuss his June 2016 meeting with conservative host Sean Hannity.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.