SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Ignoring Explosive Russia Revelations, Trump Targets Whistleblower Instead
Charges against NSA contractor viewed as "the first salvo" in Trump's war on leakers
Jun 06, 2017
In the wake of a leaked NSA document detailing the agency's assessment of Russian hacking efforts in last year's election and news of the contractor who divulged the classified report being arrested, critics are voicing concern that President Donald Trump is now showing more interest in prosecuting a potential whisteblower than in the pursuit of those behind the hacking effort itself.
"Leak information about hacking our election: harsh consequences! Actually hack our election: no consequences."
--Nicholas Thompson
The Intercept, which appears to have received the documents in the mail last month, first published the NSA's report on Monday in conjuction with an explosive analysis that examined alleged attempts by the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) to compromise crucial voter information.
Previous inquiries into the role the Russian government may have played in interfering with the 2016 presidential election concluded that "the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort," but the latest leaks reveal, as The Intercept noted, that "Russian government hackers, part of a team with a 'cyber espionage mandate specifically directed at U.S. and foreign elections,' focused on parts of the system directly connected to the voter registration process, including a private sector manufacturer of devices that maintain and verify the voter rolls."
Throughout his presidency, Trump--who has been unnervingly blase in his own handling of state secrets--has frequently voiced fury at the seemingly endless stream of information that has flowed out of government agencies.
"Leaking, and even illegal classified leaking, has been a big problem in Washington for years," Trump declared in February, adding that "low-life leakers...will be caught!"
The Justice Department on Monday took steps toward making good on Trump's promise by announcing charges against NSA contractor Reality Leigh Winner, who the FBI alleges leaked the top secret documents.
While intelligence experts responded to the new revelations as a "huge" deal, Trump has continued to play down Russia's possible role in election meddling. The White House, meanwhile, has yet to speak on the contents of the documents.
Critics quickly called attention to this one-sided pursuit.
For some, the Justice Department's swift announcement, which came shortly after The Intercept posted the documents online, represents "the first salvo" in Trump's "war on leaks."
"The case showed the [Justice Department's] willingness to crack down on leaks, as Mr. Trump has called for in complaining that they are undermining his administration," the New York Times reported on Tuesday. "His grievances have contributed to a sometimes tense relationship with the intelligence agencies he now oversees."
Adding to concerns that the announcements could be the initial steps in a broader crackdown on leakers, ACLU attorney Patrick Toomey argued that leaks "are a vital source of information for the public in our democracy."
"It would be deeply troubling," he told the Daily Beast, "if this prosecution marked the beginning of a draconian crackdown on leaks to the press by the Trump administration."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the wake of a leaked NSA document detailing the agency's assessment of Russian hacking efforts in last year's election and news of the contractor who divulged the classified report being arrested, critics are voicing concern that President Donald Trump is now showing more interest in prosecuting a potential whisteblower than in the pursuit of those behind the hacking effort itself.
"Leak information about hacking our election: harsh consequences! Actually hack our election: no consequences."
--Nicholas Thompson
The Intercept, which appears to have received the documents in the mail last month, first published the NSA's report on Monday in conjuction with an explosive analysis that examined alleged attempts by the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) to compromise crucial voter information.
Previous inquiries into the role the Russian government may have played in interfering with the 2016 presidential election concluded that "the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort," but the latest leaks reveal, as The Intercept noted, that "Russian government hackers, part of a team with a 'cyber espionage mandate specifically directed at U.S. and foreign elections,' focused on parts of the system directly connected to the voter registration process, including a private sector manufacturer of devices that maintain and verify the voter rolls."
Throughout his presidency, Trump--who has been unnervingly blase in his own handling of state secrets--has frequently voiced fury at the seemingly endless stream of information that has flowed out of government agencies.
"Leaking, and even illegal classified leaking, has been a big problem in Washington for years," Trump declared in February, adding that "low-life leakers...will be caught!"
The Justice Department on Monday took steps toward making good on Trump's promise by announcing charges against NSA contractor Reality Leigh Winner, who the FBI alleges leaked the top secret documents.
While intelligence experts responded to the new revelations as a "huge" deal, Trump has continued to play down Russia's possible role in election meddling. The White House, meanwhile, has yet to speak on the contents of the documents.
Critics quickly called attention to this one-sided pursuit.
For some, the Justice Department's swift announcement, which came shortly after The Intercept posted the documents online, represents "the first salvo" in Trump's "war on leaks."
"The case showed the [Justice Department's] willingness to crack down on leaks, as Mr. Trump has called for in complaining that they are undermining his administration," the New York Times reported on Tuesday. "His grievances have contributed to a sometimes tense relationship with the intelligence agencies he now oversees."
Adding to concerns that the announcements could be the initial steps in a broader crackdown on leakers, ACLU attorney Patrick Toomey argued that leaks "are a vital source of information for the public in our democracy."
"It would be deeply troubling," he told the Daily Beast, "if this prosecution marked the beginning of a draconian crackdown on leaks to the press by the Trump administration."
In the wake of a leaked NSA document detailing the agency's assessment of Russian hacking efforts in last year's election and news of the contractor who divulged the classified report being arrested, critics are voicing concern that President Donald Trump is now showing more interest in prosecuting a potential whisteblower than in the pursuit of those behind the hacking effort itself.
"Leak information about hacking our election: harsh consequences! Actually hack our election: no consequences."
--Nicholas Thompson
The Intercept, which appears to have received the documents in the mail last month, first published the NSA's report on Monday in conjuction with an explosive analysis that examined alleged attempts by the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) to compromise crucial voter information.
Previous inquiries into the role the Russian government may have played in interfering with the 2016 presidential election concluded that "the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort," but the latest leaks reveal, as The Intercept noted, that "Russian government hackers, part of a team with a 'cyber espionage mandate specifically directed at U.S. and foreign elections,' focused on parts of the system directly connected to the voter registration process, including a private sector manufacturer of devices that maintain and verify the voter rolls."
Throughout his presidency, Trump--who has been unnervingly blase in his own handling of state secrets--has frequently voiced fury at the seemingly endless stream of information that has flowed out of government agencies.
"Leaking, and even illegal classified leaking, has been a big problem in Washington for years," Trump declared in February, adding that "low-life leakers...will be caught!"
The Justice Department on Monday took steps toward making good on Trump's promise by announcing charges against NSA contractor Reality Leigh Winner, who the FBI alleges leaked the top secret documents.
While intelligence experts responded to the new revelations as a "huge" deal, Trump has continued to play down Russia's possible role in election meddling. The White House, meanwhile, has yet to speak on the contents of the documents.
Critics quickly called attention to this one-sided pursuit.
For some, the Justice Department's swift announcement, which came shortly after The Intercept posted the documents online, represents "the first salvo" in Trump's "war on leaks."
"The case showed the [Justice Department's] willingness to crack down on leaks, as Mr. Trump has called for in complaining that they are undermining his administration," the New York Times reported on Tuesday. "His grievances have contributed to a sometimes tense relationship with the intelligence agencies he now oversees."
Adding to concerns that the announcements could be the initial steps in a broader crackdown on leakers, ACLU attorney Patrick Toomey argued that leaks "are a vital source of information for the public in our democracy."
"It would be deeply troubling," he told the Daily Beast, "if this prosecution marked the beginning of a draconian crackdown on leaks to the press by the Trump administration."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.