SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Grand Canyon Pillagers Hope to Harness Trump's Disdain for Natural World
The 20-year ban on new uranium mining is under threat
Jun 05, 2017
Regional officials are jockeying for the Trump administration to dump an Obama-era ban on uranium mining that its supporters applauded for having closed "the door on rampant industrialization of Grand Canyon's watersheds."
That's according to exclusive reporting by the Guardian on Monday, which cites a letter from Arizona and Utah officials expected to be sent Monday to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, whose voting record left conservation groups questioning his concern for public lands.
The letter argues that the "ban took away much needed growth and jobs from our area," and claims that "the mining of uranium does not affect ground water nor destroy the natural resources of the land"--though critics of the extraction say abundance evidence, including U.S. Geological Survey studies, proves otherwise.
The 20-year ban on new uranium mining was put in place in 2012 by the Obama administration. Though the ban withstood a 2014 challenge in a federal court, it was left vulnerable by the Obama administration, as it failed to make the ban permanent by designating the area a monument--an idea with broad bipartisan support.
Conservation group Grand Canyon Trust wrote last month that the temporary hold was "in danger, whether it be from attacks by the Trump administration, Congress, or the National Mining Association," saying opponents could "come at it with everything they've got," thereby contributing to a legacy of groundwater contamination such extractions leaves behind, a problem felt acutely by the Havasupai people, who've lived in the area for hundreds of years.
The Guardian writes:
The new appeal to the Trump administration appears in the draft of a letter expected to be sent on Monday to the US interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, by the Mohave County board of supervisors, whose region borders the north side of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. Similar letters are being drawn up by other regional leaders in neighboring county governments in southern Utah, to be sent to Washington by the end of the week, according to officials.
The officials from Mohave County are pushing for extraction beyond uranium, as they
also plan to dispatch a second letter on Monday asking the federal government to scrap national monument protections for lands of natural wonder "throughout Arizona," claiming their designation is unconstitutional and prevents economic development of coal, oil, and gas deposits. Utah leaders will follow with letters requesting the government shrink national monuments in southern Utah, such as Bears Ears and Grand Escalante, in order to open up a greater area for mineral exploitation, the Guardian has learned.
The effort is no anomaly but "part of broader push by conservatives to roll back protections on America's 640m acres of public land," Joanna Walters writes, noting Zinke's lifting of a moratorium on federal coal leasing and Trump's order to Zinke that he review 27 national monuments to potentially rescind their designations.
The new reporting in the Guardian is the first installment of the news outlet's "This Land is Your Land" series launched "to hold politicians and corporate interests accountable for their environmental policies."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Regional officials are jockeying for the Trump administration to dump an Obama-era ban on uranium mining that its supporters applauded for having closed "the door on rampant industrialization of Grand Canyon's watersheds."
That's according to exclusive reporting by the Guardian on Monday, which cites a letter from Arizona and Utah officials expected to be sent Monday to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, whose voting record left conservation groups questioning his concern for public lands.
The letter argues that the "ban took away much needed growth and jobs from our area," and claims that "the mining of uranium does not affect ground water nor destroy the natural resources of the land"--though critics of the extraction say abundance evidence, including U.S. Geological Survey studies, proves otherwise.
The 20-year ban on new uranium mining was put in place in 2012 by the Obama administration. Though the ban withstood a 2014 challenge in a federal court, it was left vulnerable by the Obama administration, as it failed to make the ban permanent by designating the area a monument--an idea with broad bipartisan support.
Conservation group Grand Canyon Trust wrote last month that the temporary hold was "in danger, whether it be from attacks by the Trump administration, Congress, or the National Mining Association," saying opponents could "come at it with everything they've got," thereby contributing to a legacy of groundwater contamination such extractions leaves behind, a problem felt acutely by the Havasupai people, who've lived in the area for hundreds of years.
The Guardian writes:
The new appeal to the Trump administration appears in the draft of a letter expected to be sent on Monday to the US interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, by the Mohave County board of supervisors, whose region borders the north side of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. Similar letters are being drawn up by other regional leaders in neighboring county governments in southern Utah, to be sent to Washington by the end of the week, according to officials.
The officials from Mohave County are pushing for extraction beyond uranium, as they
also plan to dispatch a second letter on Monday asking the federal government to scrap national monument protections for lands of natural wonder "throughout Arizona," claiming their designation is unconstitutional and prevents economic development of coal, oil, and gas deposits. Utah leaders will follow with letters requesting the government shrink national monuments in southern Utah, such as Bears Ears and Grand Escalante, in order to open up a greater area for mineral exploitation, the Guardian has learned.
The effort is no anomaly but "part of broader push by conservatives to roll back protections on America's 640m acres of public land," Joanna Walters writes, noting Zinke's lifting of a moratorium on federal coal leasing and Trump's order to Zinke that he review 27 national monuments to potentially rescind their designations.
The new reporting in the Guardian is the first installment of the news outlet's "This Land is Your Land" series launched "to hold politicians and corporate interests accountable for their environmental policies."
Regional officials are jockeying for the Trump administration to dump an Obama-era ban on uranium mining that its supporters applauded for having closed "the door on rampant industrialization of Grand Canyon's watersheds."
That's according to exclusive reporting by the Guardian on Monday, which cites a letter from Arizona and Utah officials expected to be sent Monday to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, whose voting record left conservation groups questioning his concern for public lands.
The letter argues that the "ban took away much needed growth and jobs from our area," and claims that "the mining of uranium does not affect ground water nor destroy the natural resources of the land"--though critics of the extraction say abundance evidence, including U.S. Geological Survey studies, proves otherwise.
The 20-year ban on new uranium mining was put in place in 2012 by the Obama administration. Though the ban withstood a 2014 challenge in a federal court, it was left vulnerable by the Obama administration, as it failed to make the ban permanent by designating the area a monument--an idea with broad bipartisan support.
Conservation group Grand Canyon Trust wrote last month that the temporary hold was "in danger, whether it be from attacks by the Trump administration, Congress, or the National Mining Association," saying opponents could "come at it with everything they've got," thereby contributing to a legacy of groundwater contamination such extractions leaves behind, a problem felt acutely by the Havasupai people, who've lived in the area for hundreds of years.
The Guardian writes:
The new appeal to the Trump administration appears in the draft of a letter expected to be sent on Monday to the US interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, by the Mohave County board of supervisors, whose region borders the north side of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. Similar letters are being drawn up by other regional leaders in neighboring county governments in southern Utah, to be sent to Washington by the end of the week, according to officials.
The officials from Mohave County are pushing for extraction beyond uranium, as they
also plan to dispatch a second letter on Monday asking the federal government to scrap national monument protections for lands of natural wonder "throughout Arizona," claiming their designation is unconstitutional and prevents economic development of coal, oil, and gas deposits. Utah leaders will follow with letters requesting the government shrink national monuments in southern Utah, such as Bears Ears and Grand Escalante, in order to open up a greater area for mineral exploitation, the Guardian has learned.
The effort is no anomaly but "part of broader push by conservatives to roll back protections on America's 640m acres of public land," Joanna Walters writes, noting Zinke's lifting of a moratorium on federal coal leasing and Trump's order to Zinke that he review 27 national monuments to potentially rescind their designations.
The new reporting in the Guardian is the first installment of the news outlet's "This Land is Your Land" series launched "to hold politicians and corporate interests accountable for their environmental policies."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.